Alice’s Story

Alice’s Story

Since the discussion has arisen on Alice A. Bailey, I thought I would let her tell her story in her own words. Below is her account of her first meeting with a Master named Koot Hoomi. Later he turned her over to Djwhal Khul to receive the transmissions essential to laying the foundation teachings for the new age.

It was a Sunday morning. The previous Sunday I had heard a sermon which had aroused all my aspiration. This Sunday, for some reason, I had not gone to Church. All the rest of the house-party had gone and there was no one in the house but myself and the servants. I was sitting in the drawing-room reading. The door opened and in walked a tall man dressed in European clothes (very well cut, I remember) but with a turban on his head. He came in and sat down beside me. I was so petrified at the sight of the turban that I could not make a sound or ask what he was doing there. Then he started to talk. He told me there was some work that it was planned that I could do in the world but that it would entail my changing my disposition very considerably; I would have to give up being such an unpleasant little girl and must try and get some measure of self-control. My future usefulness to Him and to the world was dependent upon how I handled myself and the changes I could manage to make. He said that if I could achieve real self-control I could then be trusted and that I would travel all over the world and visit many countries, “doing your Master’s work all the time.” Those words have rung in my ears ever since. He emphasized that it all depended upon me and what I could do and should do immediately. He added that He would be in touch with me at intervals of several years apart.

The interview was very brief. I said nothing but simply listened whilst He talked quite emphatically. Having said what He had come to say, He got up and walked out, after pausing at the door for a minute to give me a look which to this day I remember very distinctly. I did not know what to make of it all. When I had recovered from the shock, I was first frightened and thought I was going insane or had been to sleep and dreaming and then I reacted to a feeling of smug satisfaction. I felt that I was like Joan of Arc (at that time my heroine) and that, like her, I was seeing spiritual visions and was consequently set aside for a great work. What it was I could not imagine, but pictured myself as the dramatic and admired teacher of thousands. This is a very common mistake on the part of beginners and I see a lot of it today in connection with various occult groups. People’s sincerity and aspiration do succeed in bringing them some inner, spiritual contact and they then interpret it in terms of personality success and importance. A reaction of over-stimulation. This reaction was succeeded by one in which the criticism He had made of me became uppermost in my mind. I decided that maybe after all I was not in the class of Joan of Arc but simply some one who could be nicer than I had been and who could begin to control a rather violent temper. This I started to do. I tried not to be so cross and to control my tongue and for some time became so objectionably good that my family got disturbed; they wondered if I was ill and almost begged me to resume my explosive displays. I was smug and sweet and sentimental.

As the years went by I found that at seven years intervals (until I was thirty-five) I had indications of the supervision and interest of this individual. Then in 1915 I discovered who He was and that other people know Him. From then on the relationship has become closer and closer until today I can, at will, contact Him. This willingness to be contacted on the part of a Master is only possible when a disciple is also willing never to avail himself of the opportunity except in moments of real emergency in world service.

I found that this visitor was the Master K. H., the Master Koot Hoomi, a Master Who is very close to the Christ, Who is on the teaching line and Who is an outstanding exponent of the love-wisdom of which the Christ is the full expression. The real value of this experience is not to be found in the fact that I, a young girl called Alice La Trobe-Bateman, had an interview with a Master but in the fact that knowing nothing whatsoever of Their existence, I met one of Them and that He talked with me. The value is to be found also in the fact that everything that He told me came true (after I had tried hard to meet requirements) and because I discovered that He was not the Master Jesus, as I had naturally supposed, but a Master of Whom I could not possibly have heard and one Who was totally unknown to me. Anyway, the Master K. H. is my Master, beloved and real. I have worked for Him ever since I was fifteen years old and I am now one of the senior disciples in His group, or-as it is called esoterically-in His Ashram.

JJ: Thus we see that the Masters she worked with were not a dream or from her subconscious, but individuals residing in physical bodies like ourselves, but with the subtle difference that they are hundreds of years old yet still perpetuate their youth.

I was asked for a definition of metaphysics. Simply put for my use it is physics of the mind. In other words, a scientific approach to thinking and philosophy as opposed to a feeling, often illogical, approach to truth as it exists in many religions. Unfortunately, many religious people believe that a logical approach to the spiritual is misleading or even evil, but as we have shown by the use of the word “faith” in the days of Jesus, that evidence is a key ingredient in the pursuit of truth.

July 17, 2000

Copyright by J J Dewey

Index for Older Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

Register at Freeread Here

Log on to Freeread Here

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Gather with JJ on Facebook HERE

Focus on Truth

Focus on Truth

The Principle:

“Put your attention on finding that which is true rather than that which is in error.”

Many people seek to prove a thing true by looking for errors and flaws. The idea is that if they find no error then only the truth is left. Why is this approach not reliable? Why is it easier to find truth by looking for truth?

Perhaps we could ask it this way. Is it better to look for red flags or the light that reveals?

Keith writes:

“You get what you look for — if you concentrate on errors you get exactly that. It’s like the weatherman telling you that it’s a 30% chance of rain — why doesn’t he tell you it’s a 70% chance of sunshine? Your mind can only concentrate on one thing at a time — if it looks for error it will find error and maybe miss the truth.”

JJ: Great answer.

Another reader makes this point:

“I think that one has to follow what seems good: why would I follow a guy that I think is deluded? Except to overcome a major blind spot of mine.”

So what should we do when we meet one who is obviously deluded? Shall we still look for truth in his illusions? And in placing our attention on that which is true, are we more likely to be deceived than one who looks for red flags?

To this I ask another question:

By expecting a meal to taste delicious are you likely to be deceived by a rotten egg that you happen to taste? Of course not. Your attention on what is good does not take away your discernment in sorting out the bad.

On the other hand, if your attention and expectation is on the idea that the meal may taste bad, or perhaps you are suspicious that someone has cooked you rotten meat, will this interfere with the pleasure of your dinner?

Yes, it certainly will. We have all met picky eaters that can’t seem to let themselves enjoy a fine meal because of some fear that it has not been prepared or seasoned properly.

Researchers did an experiment with color and food. They cooked some delicious steaks and fed then to group one and they all enjoyed them immensely. But then for group II they cooked the same meal but had them eat under a green light – thus the whole meal had a greenish tint to it.

Even though group two had the same meal the greenish tint caused the second group to focus on the fact that something may be wrong with it and few were able to enjoy it and some got sick.

Truth is like the steak. Do not focus on the greenish light (or what may be wrong) but on what may be right with it. Only by doing this can one enjoy all the truth and flavor that is in the steak (or presentation).

Question: Can one put his prime attention on that which is true and yet still use the process of elimination as an aid in discovery?

A definite yes on this one. As my food analogy illustrated one is not oblivious to bad food when he is expecting a good meal.

When one looks for the good as a primary focus of discovery he will in the process come across a number of items which stand out as obviously false.. When a real falsehood is discovered then the seeker can use this fact as one of the items in his process of elimination.

In looking for truth you may discover that 1+1 = 2 and in the process realize that the guy claiming that 1+1=3 is not correct. Now that you have proven this to yourself you can eliminate consideration of this falsehood unless some new light come to view.

How does the lack of understanding of this principle of looking for truth instead of error cause mainstream religious people to not see any truth in the world of metaphysics?

This is an extremely important principle in the search for the truth. In some ways it may be THE most important of all.

Why?

Because, in this world there lies before us at all times two paths. Path one leads to truth and the real world. Path two leads to illusion and deception. Each decision that we make takes us in the direction of one of these paths.

Visualize yourself on a path that divides. The left hand path leads to deception and the right hand leads to truth. Where are you likely to find the most truth? Taking the left hand path and discovering everything that is false, or taking the right hand path and discovering truth after truth. Which path leads to the greater progress?

The answer should be obvious.

When one puts his attention on seeing that which is true he is taking the inner right hand path. His attention on that which is true moves him in the direction of this path and moves him forward on it to truth after truth, greater light after greater light.

When one puts his attention on looking for error this attention on error moves him toward the left hand path, and as he moves along this path he sees error after error and rarely has any observation of new truth to report.

Take me as a teacher as an example. Many have come to this forum with a focus on finding truth and despite my weakness in presentation and limited grasp of higher realities, these individuals have discovered truth after truth for themselves. There have been times that members have found truth in my words that I did not realize was there.

Then there are others who join that just seem to have the feeling that something is wrong somewhere. Some feel I am in this for the money, the ego or just sincere, but deluded. Instead, then of looking for truth in my words, they look for wrong motive, ego or deceit. The problem is that we usually find evidence to prove that of which we have a preconceived notion to believe.

If, therefore, one suspects I am motivated by ego and decides to look for evidence of that conclusion he will find his evidence. The evidence may be a reflection of his own ego, but he will find it nevertheless..

Take the life of Jesus for example. He was an innocent and virtuous man, yet the Jewish leaders immediately suspected that he was in league with the devil since his teachings did not agree with their preconceived notions. Therefore, when they looked upon his words and acts what did they look for? Did they look for truth or error?

Of course, we all know that they looked for error.

And what did they find?

The amazing thing is that even with a holy man such as Jesus these individuals found only error. And thus they saw the face of the devil in the face of Christ.

If looking for error caused them of old to see the face of the devil in the face of Christ, then ought we not learn a lesson from their mistake? For if we ourselves make the same mistake of letting our prime focus be the discovery of error then would we not also see the face of evil in Christ if he were to walk among us again?

Can you think of a worse fate for yourself than to die an enemy to Christ while thinking you were fighting evil?

The interesting thing is that many who make this mistake of looking for evil are fairly decent people sincere in their search for truth. But as they progress along this left hand path the time will come that their mistake becomes obvious and when this time of reckoning does come the pilgrim must then retrace his steps and tread the higher path. If he refuses because of pride, selfishness or ego then he becomes a willing accomplice in treading the path of deception and taking others along with him.

I therefore admonish all true seekers who read these words to walk the path of light by seeking the light and looking for the light.

The apostle Paul spoke wisely here:

“Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things.” Phil 4:8

Notice that Paul advises: “think on these things.”

Yes, my friends, “think on” and see the good, the beautiful and the true and you shall become a magnet for these things and shall draw truth, pure as the driven snow into your life experience and the light that is in you will be great so no darkness or deception can there abide.

Question: H. P. Blavatsky and Alice A. Bailey were two controversial teachers who many believe to be in league with the devil. Let us suppose, for the sake of argument, that half of what they teach is not true. If this were the case would it not be better to look for the error so you will not be deceived? OR – is there still an advantage to look for truth as the prime point of focus? If the latter question is true – why is it true?

July 14, 2000

Copyright by J J Dewey

Index for Older Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

Register at Freeread Here

Log on to Freeread Here

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Gather with JJ on Facebook HERE

Alice A. Bailey on Authority

Alice A. Bailey on Authority

My friends. The writings of Alice A. Bailey say some interesting things about correct use of authority. Below is one of the best quotes.

When the glamour of authority transfers itself into the spiritual consciousness of man, we have such a state of affairs as the period of the Inquisition in its worst forms, of Church authority, with the emphasis upon organisation, government and penalties, or the unquestioned rule of some teacher. In its highest forms we have the recognition of the right of the solar Angel, of the soul or ego, to rule. Between these two extremes, which express the infancy of the race and the freedom which comes when mankind achieves its majority and the freedom of the soul, lie all the many types and kinds of intermediate reactions. In illustration of our point, and thus emphasising the glamour aspect as it affects the disciple and the problem which he faces, what do we find? The disciple has freed himself somewhat from the imposed control of an orthodox teaching and from the rule of a teacher. He stands (as far as he can tell) free from such control. Knowing however his essential weakness and the lure of the personality, he is on guard against himself, and against the ancient rules of control and learns steadily to stand on his own feet, to come to his own decisions, to distinguish truth for himself. He learns to choose his way. But, like all persons who have not taken some of the higher initiations, he can (in due time) become enamoured of his freedom, and automatically then swing into the glamour of his ideal of freedom, an ideal which he has created. He becomes the prisoner of freedom. He rejects all rule except that which he calls the “rule of his own soul,” forgetting that his contact with his soul is still intermittent. He demands the right to stand alone. He revels in his new found freedom. He forgets that, having given up the authority of a teaching and of a teacher, he has to learn to accept the authority of the soul and of the group of souls with which he is affiliated through his karma, his ray type, his choice, and the inevitability of the effects of the at-one-ment. Having relinquished the guidance of another person upon the Path, and having his eyes partially opened, he now seeks to tread that Path to the goal, forgetting however that he treads the Path in unison with others, and that there are certain “Rules of the Road” which he must master, and which he must master in unison with others. He has exchanged the individual law for the group law, but does not yet know that group law as it should be known. He marches on as best he can alone, glorying in the freedom from authority which he has succeeded in achieving. He promises himself that he will brook no authority or guidance.

Those of us who are considering him and looking on at him from the clearer heights of attainment see him gradually becoming obscured by wisps of fog and by a glamour which is gradually growing up around him as he becomes a “prisoner of the fog of freedom” and revels in what he deems the fact of his independence. When his sight has cleared, and when his mental aspect is more developed and unfolded, he will know that the Law of the Group must, and will, impose itself upon him, and that the rule of the lower nature has only to be exchanged for the rule of the soul. This is group rule and works under the law of the group. He has struggled out of the mass of seekers of the Road on to the Road itself. He is, therefore, ahead of the masses but he is not alone, even if he thinks that he is. He will discover many others who are travelling the same way with him, and their numbers will steadily increase as he progresses. The rule of interplay, of travel, and of group recognition and work and service will impose themselves upon him until he finds that he is a member of the New Group of World Servers, working under the conditions which are the rules governing their activities. As he learns to travel with them upon the Road, their governing incentives and the techniques of their chosen service will penetrate his consciousness, and automatically and naturally he will begin to obey the higher rhythm and give his assent to the laws which control group life and group consciousness. Finally, he will find himself entering into the silent places where the Masters of the Wisdom dwell, and will work in group rhythm with Them, obeying thus the laws of the spiritual realm, which are the subjective laws of God.

Time and again, along the Road, he will revolt from control and will fall back into the glamour of his supposed freedom. There is freedom from the control of the personality. There is freedom from the control of personalities. But there is never any freedom from the Law of Service, and from the constant interplay between man and man, and soul and soul. To stand really free is to stand in the clear unimpeded light of the soul, which is basically and intrinsically group consciousness.

From Glamour a World Problem, Pages 46-48

July 13, 2000

Index for Older Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

Register at Freeread Here

Log on to Freeread Here

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Gather with JJ on Facebook HERE

The Religion of Truth

The Religion of Truth

A reader related a spiritual experience ending with this statement:

“If this is what’s to come, count me in!”

This attitude indeed testifies to a contact beyond an over-active imagination. You’ll be happy to know that there is more to come than you can imagine as long as you “hold you mind steady in the light.”

Let me give you and others who receive a spiritual contact a word of warning. The power to hold this contract must be earned and not taken for granted. Approximately three days after a higher contact the seeker usually undergoes a mini dark night and the void can often be so great that he will be tempted to forget, discount or disbelieve his contact. The disciple must make a mental commitment to hold steady in the light and hold the memory of the Presence. This focus will take you through the dark night and eventually toward higher more permanent contact.

I was asked to expand on karma and suffering.

If karma dictates that a person suffer through disease or other means there will be nothing the disciple can do to heal the person. This is why the first job of the spiritual healer is to discern whether or not a healing is permissible. If it is not permissible under current conditions a path to healing can be revealed which will give the steps necessary for the afflicted one to obtain wholeness.

Suffering only comes to us when the Purpose of God is resisted. When the patient learns where the resistance is and corrects it then a healing becomes possible.

There are times that a person may accumulate tremendous Karma, such as being responsible for many deaths. Instead of coming back and giving his life ten times for ten lives he may pay the whole thing off in one life through loving service where he saves the lives of ten people, either physically of spiritually.

If you take out a loan at a bank for $100,000 when your income is at $30,000 a year, it may be a significant struggle to pay it off. But if you work within the laws of prosperity and triple your income then you can triple the amount of payment that you make and pay off the loan much sooner than expected.

The effect of the $100,000 was not reduced but the capacity to pay the debt was increased.

When we thus increase our power to serve we increase our power to pay off karma. Karma is not negated for cause and effect is an eternal interplay, but the one who knows can pay off karma much more quickly than one with no understanding.

A reader complains that we spend little time talking about the teachings of Christ.

First let me say that the recorded words of Christ in the New Testament are just a few pages. They are very great words, but, even so, there is only so much one can say about them. We have commented on a large part of His recorded words and will continue to comment as they enhance the teachings presented. For instance, we just finished commenting on “the truth shall make you free.” I have no intention of making a general exegesis of the words of Jesus in the orthodox sense as that has already been done a million times and there is plenty of reading material available in that direction.

My prime purpose is not to present again teachings of the past, but to present new teachings and give new insights on old teachings.

Some may think we are merely here for self-improvement. This may be an off-shoot of the teachings presented here, but such is far from the prime purpose. The main purpose is the Gathering of Lights and the creation of the Molecular Relationship. These two principles were taught by Jesus and I have a whole book posted on the Molecular Relationship and am currently posting one on the Gathering of Lights.

This forum is available to the whole internet free of charge and that number is getting quite large. Right now we are just reaching a handful, but that may change in the future.

One of the purposes of the Gathering is to increase the number of initiates. Through seed thoughts presented here many good works will be eventually initiated which will benefit all who are willing to receive.

No one person, group or teaching will reach all of humanity, but the Spirit of God working through all those focused in the light do have this power.

I was asked why Christ taught about baptism.

Baptism is a symbol that communicates the principle of rebirth to the inner self. Without this inner rebirth and the release of guilt the kingdom of God will not be realized.

Next, I was asked to comment on the sacrament or Eucharist.

The body of Christ as mentioned in I Cor chapter 12 is much more than the man Jesus. It is a body composed of many members. Partaking of the symbolic bread is a symbol of joining the body of Christ. Drinking of the wine is a symbol of the one Spirit that gives life to all those linked in the body of Christ.

The symbol of the Sacrament (or Eucharist) focuses the inner mind on this principle and can cause a “communion” with the Spirit.

A reader wanted to know the symbolism of mountains in the scriptures.

A mountain is a symbol of higher consciousness. This is the reason that many adepts in ages past have had their sanctuaries in mountainous areas, for the view of mountains speaks of higher awareness to the inner mind and helps inspire the aspirant in that direction.

So when the scriptures tell us to flee to the mountains for salvation they are really telling us to go to where higher consciousness is. Now remember that each scripture has at least three accurate interpretations on different levels. On a non physical level this would mean that on an individual level we are to obtain salvation by raising our consciousness, or in today’s terminology – raise up the Christ within.

On a physical level, however, it would mean to “flee” to the physical location where there is the most intense gathering of people who have higher consciousness.

Today the Lights of the planet are pretty well mixed with average humanity, but when the time comes that cities of light are created these would be the “mountains of the Lord” as prophesied in scripture for there will be a physical gathering of those who have higher consciousness.

The Questions:

Name three earned authorities in your life who have assisted you in attaining higher realization and briefly give the reason why you have reasonable trust in them.

Three trusted earned authorities my own life have been

(1) The Scriptures

(2) The Writings of Alice A. Bailey as transmitted by Djwhal Khul.

(3) The Soul

I have found the soul to be virtually infallible and the scriptures and Alice A. Bailey writings to be extremely reliable. They are all earned authorities with me because they have proven themselves time and time again.

Question:

If you find yourself in disagreement with an earned authority why is it wise to take a second look at your thoughts to make sure they are accurate?

This has happened to me a number of times with all three earned authorities, but when it does happen I have found it wisdom to give these authorities a lot of weight. In order to do this with fairness I have found I have had to release myself from that natural desire we all have to be right and then ask myself this question: This source has proven itself accurate time and time again so what makes me think it may not be right this time?

After I ask that question I then seek the answer in a way that registers in all of my make-up. In the end, to fully accept a thing it must make sense and it must feel right. Our preconceived notions often prevent us from considering a truth so its realization can dawn upon us.

Fortunately, there have been numerous times in my life that an earned authority has proven right over my protests and preconceived notions. Several times my ideological world had been turned upside down and this would not have happened if I had not had several reliable earned authorities to stabilize me on the path.

Question:

Even though earned authorities are helpful, why is it an error to consider them infallible?

A reader gives a good answer here:

“They are “only human”, and even though they might be right MOST of the time, it would be foolish to expect them to be right 100% of the time about everything. I just might even have more insight into something than they do, about a particular item.”

In the case of my authorities even the prophets were human beings like you or I and subject to error. Djwhal Khul is a Master of Wisdom, yet even a master can make a mistake. More likely though is that his spokesman may ineffectively communicate his thoughts or I may misunderstand them

The soul itself is infallible yet our interpretations of the impressions of the soul may not be accurate or we may communicate them incorrectly.

The important thing is to balance off a healthy skepticism with a considerable weight given to earned authorities to come up with the truth to the extent that it registers with your soul, mind and heart.

Now, let us put attention on the next principle of discovery:

“Put your attention on finding that which is true rather than that which is in error.”

Many people seek to prove a thing true by looking for errors and flaws. The idea is that if they find no error then only the truth is left. Why is this approach not reliable? Why is it easier to find truth by looking for truth?

Perhaps we could ask it this way. Is it better to look for red flags or the light that reveals?

July 11, 2000

Copyright by J J Dewey

Index for Older Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

Register at Freeread Here

Log on to Freeread Here

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Gather with JJ on Facebook HERE

The Three Tests

The Three Tests

The Question:

There are three major tests to apply to a spiritual teacher before he should earn any of your trust for reliability. Can you guess what they are?

Here are some comments received:

– Has soul contact

– Teaches principles rather than facts

– Does not claim to be infallible, an absolute authority or incapable of mistakes

– Stimulates students’ soul contact/self-trust

– Teaches knowledge rather than beliefs

– Presents new rather than rehashed teachings

– Does not draw attention to himself or herself or demand a personal following

– Service is the primary motivation

– Strives to practice what he or she preaches.

– They don’t look for credit.

– Their goal is for the student to join the teacher in wisdom.

– The teacher knows that he has as much to learn from the student.

– The fruits of their teachings are displayed in their students.

These are all worthy of consideration. We will leave their value up to your own souls. In addition there are probably more we have not thought of, but let me present to you what I consider the top three.

(1) Take the things you have learned to be true with reasonable certainty (especially from soul contact) and compare them to those of the spiritual teacher. If there is a high degree of complimentary thought this is a sign that you have a good starting point and a certain amount of trust is beneficial.

If the teacher is able to shed interesting light in areas of that were mysteries this would be an indication that there is something for you to learn here.

Objection: What if my own beliefs are wrong? That would mean the teacher is wrong also.

Answer: Yes, it would but at least you have a starting point and if you start on the path and continue with a pure heart you will discover your errors and correct them. If you do not at least make a start then you will never finish.

Consider people who come to this group who feel in harmony with my teachings. In almost every case they report spiritual growth and progress in their search for the truth.

Now consider others who have felt that I am deceived. Have any of them reported any learning or growth from their experience with me? A rare occurrence indeed.

This indicates that a starting point of harmony of thought between two souls is an important ingredient for progression upon the path. Notice I say “starting point?” This is because the student and teacher who start in harmony together will eventually meet conflict that must be resolved. In that resolution comes greater soul contact and vision of higher truth.

If the conflict is not resolved and the teacher possesses the greater light the student will then carry the conflict within himself and often hold a lifelong grievance toward the teacher.

(2) Examine the teachings of the potential earned authority over a period of time and range of material. Then ask yourself these questions:

Are the teachings consistent without major contradictions?

If there are seeming contradictions is the teacher able to explain them to your satisfaction?

Has the teacher made a number of predictions that did not come true?

Comment: One or two mild predictions that are wrong does not necessarily mean that the teacher has no light to offer, but a number of outlandish predictions that are far removed from reality is a sure sign that you should take your losses and run.

Does he copy the teachings of others and claim them as his own or does he seem to be bringing in new insights through the soul?

Do the teachings stimulate my higher thought and cause me to think in new directions that register positive with my soul?

Do the teachings seem to be relatively free of ego stroking?

If you study the teachings and resolve these questions to your satisfaction then you have additional reason to trust an earned authority.

(3) You prove many teachings to be true by applying them in your own life. Overall application of the principles taught brings you closer to your own soul and you sense a stimulation that brings you greater light. You find that this proven authority actually makes you less reliant on outward authority.

Questions:

Name three earned authorities in your life who have assisted you in attaining higher realization and briefly give the reason why you have reasonable trust in them.

If you find yourself in disagreement with an earned authority why is it wise to take a second look at your thoughts to make sure they are accurate?

Even though earned authorities are helpful, why is it an error to consider them infallible?

July 8, 2000

Copyright by J J Dewey

Index for Older Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

Register at Freeread Here

Log on to Freeread Here

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Gather with JJ on Facebook HERE

 

Proving Authorities

Proving Authorities

Alice A. Bailey was indeed a scribe for most of the books under her name. She received them from Djwhal Khul, a Tibetan Master who was said to be one of the three wise men from the east in a previous incarnation. He is around 300 years old and is sometimes called the “messenger boy for the Gods” because he is fairly young as far as the age of Masters go.

Alice A. Bailey’s writings were not channeled through direct voice, but by mental telepathy with full conscious awareness on her part. In fact they would sometimes disagree with the wording of the transmissions but overall Djwhal Khul was pleased with the accuracy of the final product.

The question:

Give an example of an earned authority for:

An algebra teacher.

A Racing Car Driver.

A Comedian

How can you use an earned authority to help in your progression and discovery of truth?

We’ve had several good responses on this.

Larry makes a good comment:

“If one wishes to perform algebra accurately then one would seek guidance from an authority, either a teacher who can demonstrate competence in algebra, or a book which one believes has intelligible instructions. One then ‘plants the seed’ of accepting the authority and sees if it “bears good fruit”, i.e., leads to your competence to perform algebra. If it doesn’t then you discard the authority and seek guidance elsewhere.”

We have two extremes demonstrated in our society as far as authority goes.

One extreme relies almost 100% on authority, often unearned, and refuses to consider any knowledge outside of their authority structure. In other words, their ring-pass-not consists of the authorities in their lives.

The prime example of this is the ultra religious person who accepts their scriptures, or the spokesman for their scriptures, as infallible and would accept that the moon is made of green cheese without question if the authority told them so.

The other extreme is the person who gives no weight to any outside authority. With such a person there is no one you can quote to add any weight to your argument for the only authority that has any weight with them is the inner self. Unfortunately, it is usually the inner lower self which is wrong most of the time.

New Agers cling to this extreme. Many have read some book telling then that all is within and thus there is no authority that one can use to teach them. The interesting thing is that such individuals have not usually escaped authority as they suppose for they are often rigidly following the book or teacher who told them to look within.

The Course in Miracles seems to have this effect on many. Even though it has many inspired teachings within it, misguided souls use it as an authority to reject all authority that disagrees with their mindset and thus a book, which could be elevating, causes many to stand still in their progression.

This does not mean that the book does not have merit for even the Bible has this effect.

The disciple treading the Middle Way between the two extremes will walk neither of these paths. Instead he will use both the outside and the inside blended as one divine whole to find truth. That which proves itself as reliable on the outside is given weight and passed by the soul within with no preconceived notions. Then when the soul vibrates the right chord the searcher will realize a higher level of truth than before.

There are many authorities that are easy to verify that they are indeed an earned or proven reliable in what they do or claim. For instance, it would be quite simple to prove whether or not the algebra teacher is a true source of knowledge of algebra. It would also be quite easy to discern whether or not the Spanish teacher is a true authority on Spanish. Their very teaching will prove this one way or another.

If AJ Foyt wins races consistently then that is proof that he knows something about the subject and listening to his advice would be productive if you wish to race also.

If Jay Leno makes you laugh every evening then it is a good bet that he is a good enough authority on humor to make you laugh again tomorrow.

In other words, we have trust in earned authorities for what they will, in probability, deliver tomorrow because of what they have consistently delivered in the past.

If Jay tells a joke and the whole audience roars with laughter, but nothing seems funny to you, it would be wise to consider that maybe you missed something.

Why?

Because you know from past patterns that when the audience roars with laughter at something Jays says, that there is a reason for it.

Unfortunately, there are other areas of life where just and unjust authorities make claims that is much more difficult to discern.

Politics is a notable area here. Why? Because there is no established criteria as to what makes a good politician and often there is no established way to verify that the politician really knows what he is talking about.

For instance, he may have a plan to improve education that costs a billion dollars. His ideas sound good, but when the billion dollars is spent maybe the quality of education actually goes downhill. Now some will consider him successful just because he spent a cool billion, yet others will be looking at the end result and reject him as a just authority.

He may claim his program did not work because he really needed two billion and they should trust him a second time.

Unfortunately, there are many unthinking who continue to support the unproven as authorities just because they “sound good” or fill a personal need or mindset.

Finance and success is another area where many unproven authorities find fertile soil. Have you noticed that about two-thirds of the people out there preaching success and abundance have little of either?

Have you noticed that most of the true successful people don’t really say much about their success but just go forward and demonstrate it? Yet time and time again people hire financial advisors who have done nothing in their lives but advise and success motivators who have only succeeded at convincing others that they are successful.

Perhaps philosophy and religion are the most ephemeral as far as proving reliability because of the number of forms the various doctrines will take and the difficulty in proving the teacher right or wrong.

There are three major tests to apply to a spiritual teacher before he should earn any of your trust for reliability. Can you guess what they are?

July 7, 2000

Copyright by J J Dewey

Index for Older Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

Register at Freeread Here

Log on to Freeread Here

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Gather with JJ on Facebook HERE

 

Know The Truth

Know The Truth

Some are curious about the Brotherhood of Lite compared to the Brotherhood of Light.

The Brotherhood of Lite operates under the authority of Zor and has a staff of humorous Masters dedicated to making Zor laugh. Every once in a while they inspire ordinary humans with strange and sometimes bad humor. Just take a look at some of the strange channelings out there and you’ll see what I mean.

Light is only realized where contrast casts a shadow. Without the shadow there is no vision. Even higher vision is created with the contrast of the greater light against the lesser light.

Let us examine the scripture under discussion:

“Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

“They answered him, We be Abraham’s seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?

“Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin. And the servant abideth not in the house for ever: but the Son abideth ever. If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.” John 8:3136

Verse 31 gives us a clue to the first step in becoming free through the truth: “If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed.”

What does it mean to continue in his word?

Christ is a representative of the Son of God aspect or of the soul so the scripture could read: “If you continue following the words of the soul you are true disciples of the one God.”

Then this is followed by the famous words:

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

Once we begin to receive the impressions from the soul we must focus on those words and follow them. If we follow what we have received with the highest intelligence that we know then indeed the time will come that the words of the soul will be proven to you and “you shall know the truth” of the still small voice.

Remember that all inspired words have more than one correct interpretation and here is another one.

“If you continue following the words of the soul you will know how to know the truth and knowing how to know sets you free.”

Free from what?

The scripture gives a hint:

“Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin. And the servant abideth not in the house for ever: but the Son abideth ever. If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.”

That which creates bondage is sin and freedom is obtained when the truth releases us from sin.

The trouble is that when we think of “sin” in this age we think of some fanatical Bible thumper pointing the finger of accusation to those attending an R rated movie. The Dark Brothers have indeed been successful at altering the meaning of key words from the scriptures so instead of aiding in freeing the minds of humanity they are seen as words only in use by half-crazed individuals.

Consider words such as Sin, Repent, Salvation, Born Again and others. Rarely do you see a truly intelligent person seriously use them.

Today the average person sees a sinner as “a person who will let his hair down” and have a good time. Thus if you are not a sinner you’re pretty much an introverted geek. If you don’t sin a little you’re just not cool.

But in the days of Jesus it was not cool to sin because the word sin had quite a different meaning from today.

The word “sin” comes from the Greek HAMARTANO which literally means “to miss the mark”. “Out of harmony” or “error” would be other ways to put it.

The most famous scripture using this word is:

“For we have all sinned and come short of the glory of God.” Rom 3:23

If we read this passage in the light of Greek meaning we obtain an interesting translation. “For we have all missed the mark and have come short of thinking as God does.”

Let us take this light and examine the elaboration of Jesus:

“Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin.”

What does this mean?

“Whosoever commits an error and does not correct the error incorporates that error in his belief system and becomes a servant of that erroneous belief.”

Jesus continues:

“And the servant abideth not in the house for ever: but the Son abideth ever.”

Here is wording in today’s language:

Employees of a business come and go, but the owner will stay in good times and bad times and reap all the benefits of the business. None can dismiss the owner for his position is secure.

Interpretation: If you do not center yourself in the words of the soul then the mind of God is not manifest within you. You therefore error and become a servant to something else that is not the mind of God within you. Your position is therefore not secure for the outward authority can dismiss you at any given moment.

Finally, Jesus says:

“If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.”

If you come unto the soul you are as the owner of the household, or business, and none can dismiss you. You can never lose your job or the opportunity to become that which you decide to become. You know the truth and you have power to decide and make that decision reality with no, limits. You are now free indeed – Free to become that which you decide to become in harmony with the Purpose of God.

We thus end the principle related to the discovery of truth which is the principle of discernment.

Let us now move to the next principle.

“Seek proven authorities and learn from them.”

We spent the first three months in this group telling you not to trust unearned authorities, yet there is such a thing as a reliable authority that can be a useful guide in stimulating soul contact and guiding us toward the truth.

What is the difference between the two authorities? Why is one to be avoided like the plague and the other, though not infallible, a very useful guide?

July 5, 2000

Copyright by J J Dewey

Index for Older Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

Register at Freeread Here

Log on to Freeread Here

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Gather with JJ on Facebook HERE

Perfection Revisited

Perfection Revisited

A reader asks: “How do we become perfect before God? If God Itself is not perfect; but is instead that which is becoming, is there then no perfection before God? Ahhhh, but I say there is:

“For we know in part, but when perfection comes, the imperfect disappears.” 1 Cor 13:9

JJ: We eternally are in a state of becoming because there is no ultimate perfection. Such a concept is illusion. The Masters use the term “relative perfection” because any concept of perfection is relative to the fulfillment of some objective.

The scriptures agree with this and in relation to Jesus or Deity never uses the word perfection as it is meant in English today.

A reason that people accept Jesus as God is because they see him as being perfect. Actually, there are more scriptures that talk about the perfection of the saints than that of Jesus. There are two referring to perfection in relation to him.

In the first Jesus said: “Behold, I cast out devils, and I do cures today, and to morrow, and the third day I shall be perfected.” Luke 13:32

“Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered; And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him.” Heb 5:8-9

Before we go on and discuss perfection it is important that we understand the word as it is used in the Bible. There are three basic Greek words that are translated as “perfect” or “perfection” in the King James Version. The first and most popular is TELEIOO and the corresponding TELEIOS. This word was used in the reader’s scripture and does not really mean perfection as we think of the word today but more literally means “to finish, accomplish, or complete.”

The second word is KATARTIZO. This word means to complete or finish, but in a different sense. TELEIOO has the implication of finishing a new work or effort one has taken on whereas KATARTIZO implies a restoration to something as it was in the past. Both words imply wholeness, but the first through a new task, the second through a restoration.

The third word is AKRIBELA and derivatives thereof. This is the closest Greek word to our modern word “perfect”. It means: “to do a thing precisely and exactly correct.” Paul used this word in reference to the way the Jews taught the law: “I am verily a man which am a Jew, born in Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, yet brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, and taught according to the PERFECT (exact) manner of the law of the fathers, and was zealous toward God, as YE ALL ARE this day.” Acts 22:3

When the Bible believing people of today talk about Jesus being perfect they usually use the word in the same sense that AKRIBELA was used. That is they think that Jesus obeyed all the laws “exactly” . They think of his perfection in the sense that he never made one mistake, that he never broke one commandment and exactly obeyed every injunction from the Bible. He was beyond reproach.

Actually, AKRIBELA was never used in the Bible in association with Jesus. The ones who were seeking for perfection, exactness, or AKRIBELA were the ones he continually called “hypocrites”. The Pharisees, Saducees, the Doctors of the Law, Scribes, in other words, the basic religious people of the day were continually accusing Jesus of not being AKRIBELA or perfect enough in obeying the law.

The scripture says: “THE LAW MADE NOTHING PERFECT, but the bringing in of a better hope (Christ) did; by which we draw nigh unto God.” Heb 7:19

The word for perfect here is TELEIOO and is the one used in connection with the perfection of Jesus and has nothing to do with obeying the law thus the law cannot create TELEIOO, or the perfection of Christ.

Orthodox Christians say that Jesus was perfect because he obeyed all the laws but the Bible says “The law made NOTHING perfect”?

Why do people worship Jesus and revere him as God because he exactly obeyed every law and scriptural injunction when the Bible says: “that NO MAN is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, the just shall live by faith. And the law is NOT of faith: but, the man that doeth them shall live in them. Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.” Gal 3:11-13

Here Paul boldly states that Jesus was not perfect (or AKRIBELA) because he broke the law by his very death. The Old Testament which Paul quoted stated that anyone who was hung on a tree (or cross) was “accursed of God”. (See Deut 21:23) Therefore Paul explains that if righteousness comes by the law then Jesus was cursed because he was crucified on a cross made from a tree.

Why do you suppose it was in the plan of God that Jesus violated the law of perfection (AKRIBELA) to the extent that he was to be “accursed of God” by his very death. After all, he permitted it to happen. Was it so we would look forward to something else besides a black and white interpretation for our salvation? If this is so, why do we put Jesus on a pedestal by saying he never broke a law? Why do we think of him as AKRIBELA (perfect) when the scriptures do not say this?

One of the main reasons that Jesus was rejected by the Jews is because he was not perfect or exacting enough for them in keeping the laws of God given through Moses. He did not have the black and white attitude of the typical pious person. He realized that there is a time and season for “every purpose under heaven” Eccl 3:1 He knew that no carnal law could be written that was correct in every circumstance and taught that on the principle of love “hang ALL THE LAW and the prophets.” Matt 22:37-40

Paul reinforced this and said: “For he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.” Rom 13:8 He also taught us not to be concerned with “the letter (of the law), but the Spirit: for the letter killeth, but the Spirit giveth life.” Rom 3:6

In other words, if one follows the law of love, or the spirit, he may wind up breaking the letter of the law and the prophets. Almost everyone, for instance, would be forced to break the letter of the law if he or she lived under a ruthless dictatorship. If authorities came looking for one’s child to execute him what parent would not lie to some degree to save the child from unjust suffering? In this case a lie breaks the letter of the law, but fulfills the law of love. Exceptions as this can be found for every commandment as was well illustrated by Solomon when he said there was a time for every purpose under heaven.

It should be a great relief to us that Jesus was not perfect (AKRIBELA) in the keeping of the carnal law and that his perfection was in the fact that he was able to do the job expected of him by the Father. This is especially so because of a commandment men and women everywhere are given: “Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.” Matt 5:48

Jesus was intelligent enough to not give his disciples a commandment that they could not obey, or that he himself did not adhere to. Most people see this perfection of the Father as something entirely beyond our grasp, but Jesus was talking about something that is possible for both him and us. The word perfect here comes from TELEIOS, an adjective form of TELEIOO. We find that this scripture is right in the middle of the sermon on the mount and that it makes a lot of sense when we read it in its context with a more enlightened translation:

“Finish therefore what is expected of you, even as your Father which is in heaven accomplishes that which is expected of him.” This is a commandment we can live with and appreciate and is much more applicable than an injunction to be flawless as is the One God who holds the universe together and created all the millions of galaxies. That is like telling a worm to be like a man. That is impossible, but the worm does his job assigned to him by nature just as do the higher animals. In this way all living things are perfect as the Father is perfect if they follow the harmony of nature.

A reader says: “By the way, the more you give the “devil” credit (even for the bad stuff) the more “power” you give him.”

JJ: The principle you are talking about here is that “energy follows thought.” There is much more depth to this law than even seasoned students understand.

If we put our attention on the negative then energy will follow that thought and manifest “devils” in your life.

Does this mean that we are to suppress negativity and pretend it does not exist? No, this may produce even worse results.

The key is to keep ourselves grounded in the real world by mentally acknowledging the reality of evil, negativity, the Dark Brothers etc, yet at the same time focusing thought on the desired energy and outcome. You will thus keep the realization that there is evil out there that needs to be dealt with but at the same time not feed it any energy because your directed thought is on the positive.

It’s a little like driving a car along side a river bank. It is important that you realize the river is there so you do not drive into it and destroy yourself, but at the same time you have no fear because your mind is focused on the positive goal of staying on the road and on course. You therefore do not give any energy to the thought of driving in the river, but only on your next desirable destination.

With the correct attention on thought and energy you thus live in the world of duality, but master duality.

The Dark Brothers connection with us is a little like that of a Mafia boss. The average guy does not know who he is and the Mafia boss could care less about the average guy.

The Mafia guy does have an effect on the average guy, however, for his organization is selling drugs to kids and his abuse of the system causes the average guy to pay more taxes to keep everything under control.

On the other hand, if some average person steps forward and does something that interferes with mob business then he will have their attention and will have a fight on his hands. In this case mere positive thinking will not create any immediate solution any more than a person stepping into the ring with Mike Tyson can make Mike turn into a cream puff by sending him good vibes. When in the ring with an opponent even the man of peace must fight with all means necessary or suffer defeat by default.

July 4, 2000

Copyright by J J Dewey

Index for Older Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

Register at Freeread Here

Log on to Freeread Here

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Gather with JJ on Facebook HERE

Offense, Initiation and Love

Offense, Initiation and Love

I have just returned from a family reunion my friends and guess where we had it this year?

McCall.

Actually it was just a coincidence for it is the first time we had it there. One of the highlights was a ride in my nephew’s ancient sailboat held together with chewing gum and barbwire. (LOL) Even so, he claims he can out race and out maneuver any other boat on the lake.

On the way up we stopped by to see Lorraine at her new restaurant. She gave us a big hug and she and Joe seemed very upbeat about starting their new business. We had an extra Grand Opening banner so we gave it to her in appreciation of helping with the gathering.

She doesn’t have easy access to a computer now, but I’m sure we’ll hear from her soon one way or another.

John made a great comment on the sensitivity lately:

“If someone is truly centered to any degree in the Higher Nature, rather than the lower, they don’t tend to be easily offended.”

This is also supported by the statement of Jesus: “And blessed is he, whosoever shall not be offended in me.” Matt 11:6

Why did he say this?

Because he offended almost everyone. Not because he was obnoxious or belligerent, but because he spoke the simple truth that often was not in harmony with tradition or the lower nature.

A good piece of advice for anyone wishing to get in the good graces of the Masters is to learn to mentally check their offensive meter. If one is easily offended by a wrong or misplace word then he must wait a while to do the real work. One should never be offended when no offense is intended and generally even if it was intentional.

If the disciple finds the seeds of offense being planted in his emotional body he must move the energy immediately before it interferes with his effectiveness.

I hope I have set the example for you my friends for none of you have ever offended me.

Several have been talking about initiation. I have defined an initiate as one who initiates. It was accurately pointed out that this is different from that written of by Alice A. Bailey about the milestones achieved by the disciple.

This is a true statement but incomplete for all who pass the milestones of initiation as taught by the Masters are initiates who initiate. As one passes from a lower initiation to a higher his power to initiate becomes stronger with more wide ranging effects.

For instance, as one passes from the first to the second initiation the disciple will increase his power to initiate from the purely physical to the emotional and gain the power to initiate the stirring of people’s hearts and ideals.

One of the principles that I am to stress in my writings and teachings is the concept of initiation and what it means to initiate. The coming of Christ will be prepared by those who take unto themselves the power to decide and then initiate that decision into the real world.

Love Manifesting

A reader says: “My growth, expansion, power of love, is not dependent on someone else.”

The initiative to tread the path of love is yours alone, but our growth in love as well as light is dependent on others to a significant degree.

Love is a magnetic force that is nullified in a singularity but is manifest in duality. There must be more than one for an attractive force to attract anything.

Love draws the many into the One, but when the One is manifest love has served its purpose until the many come forth again.

The Course in Miracles makes some interesting statements in this regard:

“As you come closer to a brother you approach me, and as you withdraw from him I become distant to you. Salvation is a collaborative venture.”

Here we see that our salvation through love is “a collaborative venture,” or dependent on the participation of others.

It continues:

“Help them by offering them your unified mind on their behalf, as I am offering you mine on behalf of yours. Alone we can do nothing, but together our minds fuse into something whose power is far beyond the power of its separate parts. By not being separate, the Mind of God is established in ours and as ours. This Mind is invincible because it is undivided.”

This book, which is a favorite of many, tells us that “alone we can do nothing, but together our minds fuse into something whose power is far beyond the power of its separate parts.”

I think you are trying to do too much alone and invite you to join with me and others in the bonds of love so true salvation can truly become manifest.

July 2, 2000

Copyright by J J Dewey

Index for Older Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

Register at Freeread Here

Log on to Freeread Here

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Gather with JJ on Facebook HERE

In The Name of Love

In The Name of Love

We have a couple people in the group who attempt to teach us about love, peace and harmony more than any others?

In almost every post they attempt to illustrate to us by every means possible how the rest of us do not understand these things and if we would merely follow their philosophy that we too would find this most great peace and love.

Now here is what I find interesting.

When these two do not post the people on the group are generally in great harmony, amicable sharing and there is lots of peace and love to go around.

Then as soon as they return to the group there is war, conflict, disharmony and not as much love as before. I often get e-mails from people who are leaving the group or very upset.

Why would this be so when peace and love is at the core of their belief system as they suppose? Why they love all people so much that they would not have even stepped forward to physically stopped Hitler even if it would have saved millions of lives. They believe they see beyond good and evil to the extent that there was no evil even in Hitler or Nero for it is only in the perception of the lesser evolved.

The question is why is this philosophy of peace and love not working for them in their relationship to this group and possibly other groups? The interesting thing here is that interaction in this group is not theory or mind games but interplay occurring in the real world. Here in the real world we have a chance to test theory and teachings to see if they really work.

And if they do not work?

Then we should examine that teaching and attempt to see where the error is and what can be done to correct it.

Perhaps we should do this, but first let me state that I am approaching this in the spirit of peace and love so I hope all understand this.

Is the conflict they bring to us caused merely because they are sincerely expressing their point of view and is it that their point is just different from the rest of us? Or perhaps group members are intolerant of a different viewpoint.

No, this cannot be it because we have different points of view presented when these two are not posting, usually with no conflict involved. Often the situation winds up with both sides acquiescing to agree to disagree and then we move on.

Now this does not happen with our contrarians. For over a year now we have covered similar ground again and again and there has been no agreement to disagree. They have been with us long enough to know the views of the majority on the group and I am sure they have a pretty good idea of many of my views. Thus when they present certain ideas they both have to know that they have war paint on and are making a definitude attack that will be met with many counter attacks.

Now they can say that they are not attacking, but just stating their views and those of us who respond can make a similar statement, but there is deceit and illusion in this approach.

Unless we face reality and have truth in our words, true peace, love and harmony can never be approached.

And what is the truth? Let us call a spade a spade here. Many of my teachings are attacked by them and I respond. It is a simple as that.

One difference between us is that when they attack they do not see themselves as attacking. They do not believe in attack therefore in their minds they cannot be attacking. When I attack or defend I do attempt to observe myself and analyze what is really happening in the interplay. I admit that I often do defend myself when attacked and sometimes counterattack. I try and see myself attacking the illusion rather than the person however.

For instance, I have no malice toward our two disrupters and recognize that they are sincere in their beliefs.

Nevertheless both subtly attack and stir conflict just as real as one who comes on strong with harsh words or shoves others in the subway.

How can this be? Here are examples: of trends of thought that enflame some.

(1) He who would kill in war for the sake of freedom or to save the lives of others “desires” to kill.

No great warrior from George Washington to Winston Churchill to a Vietnam Vet “desires” to kill but many have found themselves where the only way out was physical conflict and to insinuate this was part some dark desire in their heart shows a lack of loving understanding.

(2) Pressing the teaching that there is no evil to the extent that even Hitler was no more a bad guy than was Gandhi.

(3) Then turning around and insinuating that we are evil if we were to kill in self-defense or for the sake of freedom. This seems to put some on the group below Hitler in their minds.

(4) One would have been wrong to kill Hitler, even if it would have saved millions of lives.

(5) Insinuating that they are focused on love and we are not.

(6) Telling us that we have major problem because we do not understand oneness as they do.

(7) Telling us that everything that comes into our lives is because we want it there. This is an irritating thing to tell someone who is suffering or has suffered against his will.

(8) Making blanket statements that all we have to do is think positive and nothing bad will happen to us when many positive people on the group can testify otherwise.

(9) Accusing many of us as being “fear-based” when disagreeing with them.

(10) I would surmise that about 90% of their posts are in support of a stance opposing my presentation of class material. I think most of the group is mature enough to accept a few disagreements, but when one is in constant disharmony with the teacher you begin to wonder why he or she is here. It may appear that they enjoy disrupting things rather than making contributions that bring greater light on the subject under study.

I could go on but these are solid examples of the type of material that is brought up again and again by these proclaimers of peace and they have to realize that they are not taking the direction of peace but are going forth into battle. To inflame and go into battle while proclaiming that you are treading the path of love and peace is inflammatory in itself.

Now don’t get me wrong here. I like a little conflict, but when in conflict I like an adversary who will at least admit he is an adversary. To proclaim you are filling the arena with love and peace in the midst of some of the fiery conflicts we have had does not register as sincere with many readers.

So what solution do I recommend.

First and foremost honesty. If you want to fight then come out in the open and fight and do not hide behind the words of love, peace and oneness.

Second. This is a class where many are trying to learn. I am not perfect, but neither am I wrong all the time. Surely you can make a supportive non inflammatory post or question once in a while that sheds greater light on the subject. If you cannot then it appears that your mission here is to create conflict and not establish peace by any measure.

Third. Let us give each other the benefit of the doubt and realize that we are all in this together. Let us assume the best in one another. No one here seeks fear or wants to kill anyone – most do not even want to step on a fly. All seek for love and peace to the best of their understanding. All desire harmony and oneness with their fellow human beings.

June 29, 2000

Copyright by J J Dewey

Index for Older Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

Register at Freeread Here

Log on to Freeread Here

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Gather with JJ on Facebook HERE