Creating Sons of God

Creating Sons of God

In my recent post we established that the original “instant” where the separation occurred was a very long time ago, “an instant so ancient that it is beyond all memory, and past even the possibility of remembering.” That would have to be beyond the age of the universe which has a built-in memory of 13.8 billion years since its beginning. “Yet because it is an instant that is relived again and again and still again, it seems to be now.” M-2.3

Many students maintain that the separation was over in that ancient time and nothing is happening now for we are not even here. This text is often cited:

“We but undertake a journey that is over.  Yet it seems to have a future still unknown to us…. For we but see the journey from the point at which it ended, looking back on it, imagining we make it once again; reviewing mentally what has gone by.” W-pI.158.3-4

This idea that the mad event passed long ago gives way to two strange interpretations that never made any sense to me, for if the event is passed then why are we experiencing it now?

Here are the two explanations:

[1] We are reviewing the event like people watching a movie, but just became so involved we think we are really in the movie.  In this interpretation there is complete predestination. Every word you speak and action you take has already been filmed and all you are doing is exactly repeating the script. This would mean you have no free will, for every little detail of your life has been decided.

[2] If that idea is not strange enough interpretation two is even stranger which is: The separation is indeed over and you are not even here and nothing is happening or has happened. To one not familiar with ACIM this sounds like crazy talk, but for many students the declaration of “I am not here and nothing is happening” is praiseworthy insider lingo.

Neither one of these interpretations ever made any sense to me. If this world is such a nightmare, as the Course says, and we have free will, then why would we choose to relive the dream as if it is real? If you were burned alive in a particular life, would you choose to make it real again?  I don’t think so.

And as for the nothing is happening idea – whether this is a dream or not we are definitely undergoing an experience in time as the Course itself verifies: The separation is a system of thought real enough in time, though not in eternity. All beliefs are real to the believer.   T-3.VII.3

Since neither of the two orthodox interpretations make sense to many, the question arises as to whether there could be another one that does make sense that has just been overlooked.

To this I give a positive “yes,” but before we solve the mystery the student must understand that, according to ACIM, when the separation first occurred that not all the Sons of God participated. In fact, some tried to prevent it.

The parable of the Prodigal Son, referenced in the Course, relates that there were two sons. In fact the earliest references to it called it “The Story of the Two Sons.” In this account one son went into the world, but the other stayed home with the Father.

It is interesting that an account received by Helen Schucman corresponds to this:

“The Atonement actually began long before the crucifixion. Many Souls offered their efforts on behalf of the separated ones, but they could not withstand the strength of the attack and had to be brought back. Angels came, too, but their protection did not suffice because the separated ones were not interested in peace.” UR T 2 B 43

Many souls, or sons, along with angels, tried to bring back the separated ones but were unable to and had to be “brought back.”.

Understanding that only part of the Sonship separated is essential to seeing the full picture of the separation in a way that makes sense.

So how does this piece of knowledge help us understand the teaching that the separation instant “is relived again and again and still again”?

The answer is fascinating indeed.

The Course indicates a number of times that the returning sons are in heaven to stay and “there will be no Call to return.” T-5.I.5

So, what do the returning sons do in heaven along with the sons who never left?

We are told this: “He (God) created you (the Son) as part of Him.” T-24.VI.1 and “You were created only to create” T-14.I.4

As a Son you are to “accept your rightful place as co-creator of the universe.” W-pI.152.8 for “all His extensions are like Him” (the Father). T-12.IV.6

The Course clearly tells us that the Son of God (us) will have sons just as the Father had Sons.

“Without your Father you will not know your fatherhood. The Kingdom of God includes all His Sons AND THEIR CHILDREN, who are as like the Sons as they are like the Father.” T-7.XI.7

There you have it. The Sons of God will have “children, who are as like the Sons as they are like the Father.”

This idea is reinforced here:

“His joy lay in creating you, and He extends His Fatherhood to you so that you can extend yourself AS HE DID. You do not understand this because you do not understand Him.” T-8.VI.6

It is certainly true that many students do not understand the Father and Son concept, but it is further clarified here:

“the Son gives Fatherhood to his Creator, and receives the gift that he has given Him. It is because he is God’s Son that HE MUST ALSO BE A FATHER, WHO CREATES AS GOD CREATED HIM. The circle of creation has no end.” T-28.II.1

It is pretty clear then that eternity consists of an endless and ongoing creation process that creates additional Sons of God.

The returned Sons have satisfied their curiosity and would have no desire for further illusions, but what about the newly birthed Sons who have never known the separation? Does it not make sense that some of them would be curious about an experience so different than what they have in heaven?  Would they not share some of the same ideas their fathers once had?

And when the parent warns the child of the perils of making a world separate from heaven, is it not true that the child does not listen? Concerning us as prodigal sons it is written:

“What has been learned and understood and long ago passed by is looked upon as a new thought, a fresh idea, a different approach.” M-2.4

So, even though the original separation has been over and done we thought that we could use “a new thought, a fresh idea, a different approach,” and revive the original instant and make a much better world than did our parents.

Isn’t that typical of children? They always want to do things differently, but often wind up making the same mistakes as their parents.

It is interesting though that there was only one separation in one eternal instant, but because all instants in heaven are eternal, they can be revisited, and this is obviously what we did as created Sons.

We are now living in that instant, called the “unholy instant” by ACIM and have taken on a lot more pain than we planned. Now the call is to enter the holy instant and return to heaven.

To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.

“Search” site:freeread.com

Join A Course in Miracles Discussion Group on X (Twitter) HERE

Access other articles associated with ACIM HERE

Check out JJ’s books on Amazon HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Posts 2016-2022

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Check out JJ’s Facebook Group HERE

Reliving the Separation

Reliving the Separation

I’ve been getting some pushback on some of the teachings from A Course in Miracles I present, as some run contrary to that which is presented by orthodox teachers of the Course. When the typical student hears something that runs contrary to a group mindset it is common to automatically reject it without trying to see the reason and thought behind it.  I assure you that the ideas I present are not only logical, but supported by the Course itself, for sometimes one must carefully examine the wording to get the full truth.

The problem with the idea of ideas and thought being eternal is that this would include the mad idea of separation and students just want everything wrapped up neat and clean and not ever think of having the problem again.  BUT if it is true that the mad idea repeats it will be important to know, for whatever is true is a piece of the whole picture that will be needed at some time or another.

That said let us look again at a key passage.

“Time really, then, goes backward to an instant so ancient that it is beyond all memory, and past even the possibility of remembering. Yet because it is an instant that is relived again and again and still again, it seems to be now.” M-2.4

The first sentence tells us that time goes back to an “instant” extremely ancient past all memory and “In that unholy instant time was born, and bodies made to house the mad idea and give it the illusion of reality. And so it seemed to have a home that held together for a little while in time, and vanished. For what could house this mad idea against reality but for an instant?” T-20.VI.8

The mad idea then was given a home with the illusion of reality for an “instant” and then vanished, but not completely “For we but see the journey from the point at which it ended, looking back on it, imagining we make it once again; reviewing mentally what has gone by.” W-pI.158.3

This aligns with the second sentence of our first quote: “Yet because it is an instant that is relived again and again and still again, it seems to be now.” M-2.3

This brings up a question rarely asked by students, but to me it is the elephant in the room.

If the separation ended long ago then why are we still experiencing it.?

If there is to be “no Call to return” T-5.I.5. then why have we returned and decided to relive the separation?

Why are we of our own free will reliving the separation “again and again and still again”?

Why are recalling the instant of the separation and reliving it when we are told that we will not even remember it in heaven after we return?

“You will not remember change and shift in Heaven. You have need of contrast only here.” T-13.XI.6 “Memory, like perception, is a skill made up by you to take the place of what God gave in your creation.” T-28.I.2 “Nothing that you remember now will you remember. “T-19.IV.D.6

Seemingly contrary to that the Course says “What happened long ago seems to be happening now.” M-2.3

The conundrum comes down to this. On one hand we are told the separation came and went long long ago. A total solution was created by God and we are safe at home with no call to return. It is as if nothing happened for the separation was not a part of the true reality in heaven.

On the other hand, it speaks of “that one instant still called back, as if it could be made again in time. You keep an ancient memory before your eyes.” T-26.V.5

If the dream of separation was a nightmare that any sane Son would not want to repeat then why are we now of our own free will in the dream repeating it?

Since we have free will we had to choose to dig up an old memory and relive it. That would really be madness for someone who suffered great pain in the separation.

The answer to all this is quite simple.

In an ancient interval there was one eternal instant in heaven where the thought of separation occurred. After God rejected the idea, then part of the Sonship went ahead with the it. Immediately God created a plan of Atonement to bring the Sons back. After a long cycle of time, but just an instant in heaven, the world disappeared, the prodigal son returned which was “So very long ago, for such a tiny interval of time, that not one note in Heaven’s song was missed.” T-26.V.5

But fast forward to another cycle where we are and “is that one instant still called back, as if it could be made again in time. You keep an ancient memory before your eyes.” T-26.V.5

So here is what I present. There is no contradiction here because indeed the instant wherein the idea of separation occurred passed long ago, but nothing is lost in heaven and every instant that ever occurred there can be accessed and experienced. Sons of God who never experienced the world of time and space recalled this instant and decided to experience it.

Who are these Sons who did not participate in the initial separation, but are reliving it now?

To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.

“Search” site:freeread.com

Join A Course in Miracles Discussion Group on X (Twitter) HERE

Access other articles associated with ACIM HERE

Check out JJ’s books on Amazon HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Posts 2016-2022

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Check out JJ’s Facebook Group HERE

Does the Mad Idea Repeat?

Does the Mad Idea Repeat?

The Course makes this profound statement:

“What God and His Sons create is eternal” T-8.VI.3

The Course though makes a distinction between “create” and “make.”  It tells us that creation applies to things that are eternal and are a function of heaven, whereas that which is made applies to what we try to create in this world, which are temporary things.

The interesting thing about the “mad idea” of separation is that it was conceived by the Son while he was yet in heaven, before the making of the ego or of this world.

That would give an eternal quality to the manifestation of the idea if executed as indicated here:

“Into eternity, where all is one, there crept a tiny, mad idea, at which the Son of God remembered not to laugh. In his forgetting did the thought become a serious idea, and possible of both accomplishment and real effects.” T-27.VIII.6

So, this tells us the mad idea was conceived in “eternity” which made it “possible of both accomplishment and real effects.”

Notice that nothing attributed to this world or the ego is said by the course to have any possibility of “real effects.”

The only way the idea could have real effects, as “real” is defined by ACIM, was if the mad idea was executed by the Son in union with the mind of God in heaven.

This the Father could not allow for it is written:

“You were at peace until you asked for special favor. And God did not give it for the request was alien to Him, and you could not ask this of a Father Who truly loved His Son.” T-13.III.10

The Son did not take this rejection for an answer and manifested the mad idea the best he could in a separated state out of heaven. All this from beginning to end was said to take place in an instant.

An instant in the course can occur in a second or flash of time, or in heaven it can cover from beginning to the end of our whole world which lasts billions of years to us. Here it refers to the event of separation

“The tiny instant you would keep and make eternal, passed away in Heaven too soon for anything to notice it had come.” T-26.V.4

So, all of our time in the world of separation is only considered a “tiny instant” from the view of eternity.

Yet even though it has passed away in heaven it is still “an instant that is relived again and again and still again.” M-2.3 Thus we find ourselves reliving an instant that is no longer recognized in heaven.

All the instants originating in heaven are considered holy for “The holy instant is this instant and every instant.” T-15.IV.1 The Holy Instant we experience here on earth is a reflection of instants in heaven

Speaking of the holy instant available to us it says:

the whole of Heaven lies in this instant, borrowed from eternity and set in time for you.” T-17.IV.11

The instant involving the separation was an event concerning “the original error that shattered Heaven” T-18.I.12 so the Course calls it an “unholy instant,” even though it also maintains that all instants are holy. I suppose we can conclude it was a holy instant used for an unholy purpose.

Even so, it was still an instant that took place in heaven and “the whole of heaven” was within it and the Sonship used this instant to create a world after his own desires and make it real.

He did this using the divine power that given to him by God. Concerning this it is written:

This is the little part you think you stole from Heaven. Give it back to Heaven.” T-18.IX.1

Why does heaven want the stolen thought or “spark” from this instant in heaven?

Because each instant in Heaven has “the whole of Heaven” within it and everything in heaven is eternal including our thoughts. Each instant is eternal and the timeless present are always associated with an instant:

“the holy instant is eternal” T-16.VII.7 “Give the eternal instant, that eternity may be remembered” T-15.I.15 “the instant of peace is eternal.” T-15.II.2

Obviously, the instant where the separation occurred would have also contained “the whole of Heaven,” for “The holy instant is this instant and every instant,” T-15.IV.1

 and thoughts from there would have eternal consequences.

But how can this be when all things we see in this world and the visible universe are not eternal, but have an end?  All the bodies of living things disintegrate at death and even the earth, sun and the universe itself will have an end someday.

Where is eternity manifest in the creation/making of this world by the Sonship?

Answer: That which is temporary repeats and the repetition can last forever. If that which is temporary repeats eternally then it has an eternal aspect to it.  This eternal aspect will apply until all of the Sonship give back the stolen power to heaven.

The repetition of the mad idea is clearly enunciated here:

“Time really, then, goes backward to an instant so ancient that it is beyond all memory, and past even the possibility of remembering. Yet because it is an instant that is relived again and again and still again, it seems to be now. … The world of time is the world of illusion. What happened long ago seems to be happening now. Choices made long since appear to be open; yet to be made. What has been learned and understood and long ago passed by is looked upon as a new thought, a fresh idea, a different approach.” M-2.3 & 4

Time (which would include the separation), it says, goes back to an “instant” that “is beyond all memory, and past even the possibility of remembering.”

So, how far back would that be? Well, if celestial beings cannot even find the beginning of the separation then it has to be further back than humans can discover.

And what have they discovered?

By examining the memory clues built into the universe scientists have concluded that our current universe began 13.8 billion years ago.

That is one whopping long period of time, but it is within the built-in memory of the universe.

 The Course says that the original separation occurred way beyond “even the possibility of remembering.”

When would that be?

It could only be concerning a universe that existed before this one or perhaps many universes ago.

Many scientists are now theorizing that our current universe is only one of a long series of them. This agrees with many of the spiritual teachings of the east which says that there were many universes before this, and like the Course says, the beginning is beyond the possibility of any memory.

The quote continues saying that the original separation where time began “is an instant that is relived again and again and still again, it seems to be now.”

That statement makes it pretty clear that the effect of the original separation occurs “again and again and still again.”

And it makes clear it is not talking about the minutes, days or hours of our lives for it says “What happened long ago seems to be happening now. Choices made long since appear to be open.” That “long ago” instant was way back in time beyond the possibility of remembering and “Choices made long since appear to be open.” Think for a moment. How can what happened billions of years ago appear to be happening now? Brushing your teeth in the morning just doesn’t cut it for an answer. One of those choices was the separation itself indicating that the Sonship can choose a separation for a second time or more.

The conclusion we derive so far is this:

[1] The idea for the separation occurred within an eternal instant by the Sonship while in yet an awakened state where all creations are eternal.

[2] Because the idea of separation, time, form and space originated in eternity, and borrowed an eternal thought, it has an eternal quality to it.

[3] Because that which is manifest through the idea is unreal or temporary the only way eternity could manifest is by repetition. Time, space and form can manifest “again and again and still again.”

[4] The original separation is much further back than most students realize, far beyond “even the possibility of remembering,” indicating it is further back than the age of his universe which is calculated to be 13.8 billion years.

[5] The idea of the separation is repeated “again and again and still again.”

The question then is this. The Sons of God have free will, so why would Sons willingly repeat the separation when the Course calls such an experience a “nightmare?” After all, it says that there will be no call to return, so what is the explanation of the Sonship reliving the mad idea many times?

To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.

“Search” site:freeread.com

Join A Course in Miracles Discussion Group on X (Twitter) HERE

Access other articles associated with ACIM HERE

Check out JJ’s books on Amazon HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Posts 2016-2022

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Check out JJ’s Facebook Group HERE

 

Real and Unreal Ideas

Real and Unreal Ideas

I’ve gotten some strong resistance to my posts giving evidence from ACIM that ideas are eternal, even bad ideas. I stated that any idea, good or bad, cannot be destroyed. By that I mean that it cannot be in total oblivion to the extent that it can never be accessed by any life in the universe.

I realize that many Course students believe that when we enter heaven that every idea associated with the separation will be obliterated, impossible to ever come to mind again.

Yes, it is true that the Course teaches that when fully awake and in heaven that our thoughts are all in harmony with the mind of God and no unreal thoughts are there. Thoughts and ideas in harmony with God are called “real” because they produce eternal results.

Thoughts and ideas centered on love, union and eternity are considered real, as they deal with the formless world of pure spirit and the effects are eternal. In other words: “What is thought by the Mind of God is eternal, being part of creation.” W-pI.45.3

Then there are thoughts and ideas that deal with that which is defined by the Course as being “unreal.”  Unreal thoughts and ideas are not part of heaven and can only be entertained in the separated state.

Unlike real thoughts that create eternal things, unreal thoughts and ideas produce temporary things, or anything with a beginning and an end.

This includes anything that can be perceived with the senses for “Perception did not exist until the separation introduced degrees, aspects and intervals” T-3.IV.1 and when we return “nothing that the eyes have ever seen or ears have heard remains to be perceived.” T-27.III.7

Temporary creations from unreal thoughts and ideas include our physical bodies, trees, bees, flowers, sunsets the stars or basically anything you perceive because all that can be perceived is temporary.

So, you have two classes of ideas – the real, which creates the eternal and the unreal, which makes the temporary.

But there is one thing that both the real and unreal ideas have in common.

They cannot be destroyed to the point where no one can ever think them again.

Unreal, or wrong thinking and ideas, can be undone and replaced with real ones so their effects will no longer exist, but the actual formless unreal thoughts and ideas, positive and negative, have eternal existence.’

This confuses students because anything not in heaven is defined in the Course as not real or not existing.

It is as if the unreal does not exist in heaven because it is not allowed there. Here on earth, one cannot offer concrete proof of what happens in heaven, but we are told this: “Earth can reflect Heaven or hell; God or the ego.” T-14.IX.5

Let us then take a reflection of heaven by looking at a roughly similar example on earth, like Jesus did with the parable of the Prodigal Son.

A Father is in charge of a certain household and has certain ideas in place to which the children must abide if they are going to live there in peace.  All goes well for some time as the rules are fair and the benefits of living in the home are great.

Then one day a son becomes interested in smoking pot, but he doesn’t want to just smoke it outside the home, but inside where he spends his time. He asks his father’s permission to do so.

His father replies that dugs like that would lead to behavior that could shatter the peace and happiness of the household so he doesn’t allow it.

The Son really wants to smoke so he leaves the home and enjoys partying with friends. Then he winds up taking other drugs that he knows the Father would not allow. He gets severely addicted but finally comes to his senses, quits and returns home to a father who welcomes him again, and again complies with the ideas that govern the home.

The rules of the father are compared to real thoughts and those not allowed to the unreal.

Did the undoing of the wrong thinking of the son destroy the idea of taking drugs?

No. It is still out there, but it does not exist in his real home. When he is home, it is as if harmful drugs do not even exist.

In this world, which can reflect heaven, we can undo our wrong thinking so it is as if it never existed, but the ideas behind it cannot be destroyed and can surface again if wrong decisions are made.  If the Son truly has learned his lesson though he will never again embrace the idea of taking addictive drugs.

The unreal is not allowed in heaven so any ideas associated with it are like they do not exist, until a Son entertains the idea of separation, or the unreal, then all the unreal ideas are available and the power of the Sonship makes them seem real.

Unreal ideas include lots of dualities, good and evil, such as flowers and weeds, beautiful bodies and not so beautiful, marriage and divorce, hate and romantic love and basically anything you can see.  All these things are temporary, they come and go, but the ideas remain. Everyone who was married 1000 years ago is no longer here, but the idea of marriage remains for anyone who steps out of heaven.

But stepping out of heaven is an idea in itself. It was the original “mad idea” that originated with the Sonship while still in heaven giving it an eternal quality. Concerning our thinking process, heaven exclaims, “This is the little part you think you stole from Heaven. Give it back to Heaven.” T-18.IX.1 Concerning the Holy Instant it says: “the whole of Heaven lies in this instant, borrowed from eternity and set in time for you.” T-17.IV.11 This applies to every instant from heaven which would include the one where separation occurred: “The holy instant is this instant and every instant.” T-15.IV.1

Yes, an “instant” was taken from heaven and divided again and again to create (or make) the vast universe that we see through our telescopes.

The question one arrives at here is how can an idea that originates in heaven, where only the real exists, wind up creating the unreal, or things with a beginning and an end that is not eternal? Where is the eternal effect in this idea?

To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.

“Search” site:freeread.com

Join A Course in Miracles Discussion Group on X (Twitter) HERE

Access other articles associated with ACIM HERE

Check out JJ’s books on Amazon HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Posts 2016-2022

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Check out JJ’s Facebook Group HERE

 

Eternal Thoughts and Ideas

Eternal Thoughts and Ideas

A Course in Miracles teaches of things that are eternal and those which are not. It tells us that anything that is in this world which has form has a beginning and an end, even “the stars will disappear in light, and the sun that opened up the world to beauty will vanish.” T-17.II.4 “the time will come when all things visible will have an end.” C-4.1 In heaven, “nothing that the eyes have ever seen or ears have heard remains to be perceived.” T-27.III.7

So, what are things that are eternal then? This would be that which is formless, invisible and has no manifestation in time and space.  The Course tells us of two such things which are

[1] Thoughts

What is thought by the Mind of God is eternal, being part of creation.” W-pI.45.3

“Thoughts are not born and cannot die. They share the attributes of their creator, nor have they a separate life apart from his. The thoughts you think are in your mind, as you are in the Mind which thought of you.” T-30.III.6

[2] Ideas

The second is an idea, for we are taught of “of ideas that are eternal.”  T-9.IV.4

And where do ideas come from?

“Every idea begins in the mind of the thinker. Therefore, what extends from the mind is still in it, and from what it extends it knows itself.”  T-6.III.1

It only makes sense when you think of it that an idea cannot be destroyed. Let us take the idea of a house for example. You can manifest that idea by building a house but the physical house is temporary and will eventually fall apart and be destroyed. But the idea of a house is eternal so another can take the idea and build another house – and then another.  Ideas are eternal and cannot be destroyed.

This would apply to bad ideas as well as good. Take the idea of war, which most think is a bad idea. When we finished World War I, which was called the war to end all wars, we find that the idea remained and resurfaced in World War II and other wars.

The manifestation in form of all ideas is temporary, but the idea itself always remains.

So how about the craziest idea of all, according to ACIM?

“Into eternity, where all is one, there crept a tiny, mad idea, at which the Son of God remembered not to laugh. In his forgetting did the thought become a serious idea, and possible of both accomplishment and real effects.” T-27.VIII.6

So, the “thought” which the Course says “cannot die” manifests as “a serious idea” and ideas cannot be destroyed.

We are also told that “Ideas are of the mind…. ideas leave not their source.”  T-26.VII.4

And within whose mind is the source of the mad idea?

The Sonship

And since ideas leave not their source where will this idea eternally remain?

The Sonship.

Does this mean that because of freewill that there is no way to prevent the mad idea from manifesting again, even after this world ends?

So far  powerful evidence from ACIM tells us that ideas are eternal and cannot be destroyed.

Ideas fall into two categories,

First are those that are in harmony with heaven and create no form that can be perceived in time and space. The second are ideas that are not in harmony with Spirit and these create temporary forms in this world such as a flower, a body, a planet etc. Unlike creations in heaven all physical forms have a beginning and an end

Even though all form is a part of the “mad idea” the Course does recognize the value of the ideas behind the forms as in this quote:

“In you is all of Heaven. Every leaf that falls is given life in you.  Each bird that ever sang will sing again in you. And every flower that ever bloomed has saved its perfume and its loveliness for you.” T-25.IV.5

We see that the idea of a bird “will sing again in you” even though its body that does the singing is a part of the mad idea. Then too, the loveliness of that form we call the flower is saved. Each leaf that dies and falls will be given life again.

Those in this world consider these and other forms to be of great value, but they are still a part of the mad idea that ends in separation. But even though the body of a bird or a human or a planet cannot enter heaven the idea behind them is eternal and cannot be destroyed.

So, what happens when this current universe dies and all the stars, birds, flowers and people are no longer there?  It would seem as if nothing exists but heaven as described by ACIM.

Not quite. The idea of the universe of time and space remains and since we have free will a part of the Sonship could manifest it all over again.

Those of us who have spent millions of years in the separation and have returned would most likely have little interest in participating in a repeat, but other parts of the Sonship who have not yet experienced time and space would be curious about the experience just as we were.

The Son didn’t see the humor in the mad idea as did the Father and because what the Son recreates is eternal the idea “become a serious idea, and possible of both accomplishment and real effects.”

This seems to be the one thing the Father denied the Son, but the Son did the closest thing to it by creating the illusion that seemed real.  The idea was thought in heaven so it cannot be destroyed and if a Son through freewill wants dream up another ego then the ego can remanifest a world like this all over again.

Consider this:

“Yet He has created the Holy Spirit as the Mediator between perception and knowledge. Without this link with God, perception would have replaced knowledge FOREVER in your mind.” W-pI.43.1

Because what the Son creates is eternal then he would have been trapped in the dream forever if God had not intervened and created the Holy Spirit. Because of the Holy Spirit we can wake up, but the Sonship still has the free will to dream again.

From the reaction I have received to the above it seems that many are missing the point of what I am posting in that they are not differentiating between an idea and the manifestation of the idea.

The idea itself, whether good or bad, is formless and that which is formless cannot be destroyed.  On the other hand, the manifestation of an idea can take form, but when it does it always comes to an end.

I may have an idea to bake a pie. The baking process has a beginning and an end and the pie will be devoured bringing an end to that also.  A day or two afterwards one could say that it is as if I never baked the pie.  All form related to the idea is gone.

But wait!!!

The idea remains and a few days later I bake another pie.

Never in the history of the universe as anyone, even God, been able to destroy an idea.  We can ignore it though.  I can decide to never bake another pie, so for me it will seem that the idea does not exist, but Sue down the road picks up the idea and she bakes a pie. The formless idea remains, but the form comes and goes.

To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.

“Search” site:freeread.com

Join A Course in Miracles Discussion Group on X (Twitter) HERE

Access other articles associated with ACIM HERE

Check out JJ’s books on Amazon HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Posts 2016-2022

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Check out JJ’s Facebook Group HERE

Is ACIM a Metaphor?

Is ACIM a Metaphor?

Periodically I notice that when students come across a passage from the Course that disagrees with their mindset, they will tell us that it is just a metaphor and it does not mean what it appears to mean. They will often quote this passage from the course:

“Let us not forget, however, that words are but symbols of symbols.”      M-21.1

The first thing to note here is that ACIM uses a form of the word “symbol” over 100 times, but how often do you think it uses the word “metaphor”?

Answer: ZERO.

There is a reason for this. A word as a symbol represents a meaning as close as we can get to the real thing whereas a metaphor compares one image to another noting the similarities.

For instance, the word “God” represents our real Creator and is the closest word available to communicate this Being.

On the other hand, the term “Santa Claus in the Sky” is often used as a sarcastic metaphor for God, but is not meant to be a symbol accurately communicating the idea of Him.

The question remaining is this: Since words are symbols does this mean that the message they give us is not reliable?

We should be thankful that this is not the case, for if it where we might as well throw ACIM and other favorite teachings in the trash. While it is true that words often cannot relay the full meaning, that which they do communicate is usually pretty accurate.

Let us take the word “heaven” for example. This represents a state of being that is joyful and peaceful. Even an atheist gets a rough idea of what that would be.

But imagine the added dimension to your understanding of it if you actually experienced it? Then you might say that it is beyond our ability to accurately and fully communicate the experience in words. On the other hand, you would still use the word “heaven” when talking about it because it is the best word we have and gives us the general idea.

The Course backs this up

“As symbols, words have quite specific references. Even when they seem most abstract, the picture that comes to mind is apt to be very concrete.” M:21.2     

Concerning the phrase “I want the peace of God” the text says this:

“The world would be completely changed, should any two agree these words express the only thing they want.” W-pI.185.1

Notice it doesn’t say that the words written are a metaphor without understandable meaning, but the meaning is clear enough that just two agreeing on them could change the world.

And why not take the words at face value, for Jesus in the Course says “my words make perfect sense because they come from God.” T-9.IV.4

If the words in ACIM represented some obscure metaphor then they would not “make perfect sense.”

Then we have this: “You have surely begun to realize that this is a very practical course, and one that means exactly what it says.” T-8.IX.8

How could the Course mean what it says if the words are merely obscure metaphors that cannot communicate?

Then we have this as a coup d’é·tat

“you may believe from time to time that I am misdirecting you. I have made every effort to use words that are almost impossible to distort, but it is always possible to twist symbols around if you wish.      T-3.I.3

So, how does one “twist symbols around?”

One does this by taking the obvious meaning and telling us that it does not say what it is saying because it is a metaphor.

The bottom line is this:

Yes, words as symbols are imperfect and in the true reality, we will not even need them because communication will be instant and fully realized.

But that is not the case here. In this world words are our primary source of communication and can lead us to awakening if we do not alter their meaning to suit our preconceived notions.

A reader points out that there are numerus actual metaphors used un the Course.

My point wasn’t that ACIM does not use metaphors, for at times it does. But in actually using a variation of the word “symbol” over a hundred times and none for metaphor that it was placing emphasis on the symbolism of words for every word is a symbol of something, but not very word is a metaphor.

When the Course does use a metaphor, it is obvious to the reader that it is not to be taken literally, but then it says many things difficult for the average person to believe that actually should be taken quite literally. For instance, when Jesus said that faith could move mountains many thought it was just symbolic like a metaphor, but the Course sets us straight on this.

“It is hard to recognize that thought and belief combine into a power surge that can literally move mountains.” T-2.VI.9

“Why is it strange to you that faith can move mountains? This is indeed a little feat for such a power.” T-21.III.3.

So it goes with many statements in ACIM that are not obvious metaphors, but difficult to believe. Many will just dismiss them as symbolic and not to be taken literally when the intent was to be taken as written.

To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.

“Search” site:freeread.com

Join A Course in Miracles Discussion Group on X (Twitter) HERE

Access other articles associated with ACIM HERE

Check out JJ’s books on Amazon HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Posts 2016-2022

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Check out JJ’s Facebook Group HERE

 

Is ACIM a Metaphor?

Is ACIM a Metaphor?

Periodically I notice that when students come across a passage from the Course that disagrees with their mindset, they will tell us that it is just a metaphor and it does not mean what it appears to mean. They will often quote this passage from the course:

“Let us not forget, however, that words are but symbols of symbols.”      M-21.1

The first thing to note here is that ACIM uses a form of the word “symbol” over 100 times, but how often do you think it uses the word “metaphor”?

Answer: ZERO.

There is a reason for this. A word as a symbol represents a meaning as close as we can get to the real thing whereas a metaphor compares one image to another noting the similarities.

For instance, the word “God” represents our real Creator and is the closest word available to communicate this Being.

On the other hand, the term “Santa Claus in the Sky” is often used as a sarcastic metaphor for God, but is not meant to be a symbol accurately communicating the idea of Him.

The question remaining is this: Since words are symbols does this mean that the message they give us is not reliable?

We should be thankful that this is not the case, for if it where we might as well throw ACIM and other favorite teachings in the trash. While it is true that words often cannot relay the full meaning, that which they do communicate is usually pretty accurate.

Let us take the word “heaven” for example. This represents a state of being that is joyful and peaceful. Even an atheist gets a rough idea of what that would be.

But imagine the added dimension to your understanding of it if you actually experienced it? Then you might say that it is beyond our ability to accurately and fully communicate the experience in words. On the other hand, you would still use the word “heaven” when talking about it because it is the best word we have and gives us the general idea.

The Course backs this up

“As symbols, words have quite specific references. Even when they seem most abstract, the picture that comes to mind is apt to be very concrete.” M:21.2     

Concerning the phrase “I want the peace of God” the text says this:

“The world would be completely changed, should any two agree these words express the only thing they want.” W-pI.185.1

Notice it doesn’t say that the words written are a metaphor without understandable meaning, but the meaning is clear enough that just two agreeing on them could change the world.

And why not take the words at face value, for Jesus in the Course says “my words make perfect sense because they come from God.” T-9.IV.4

If the words in ACIM represented some obscure metaphor then they would not “make perfect sense.”

Then we have this: “You have surely begun to realize that this is a very practical course, and one that means exactly what it says.” T-8.IX.8

How could the Course mean what it says if the words are merely obscure metaphors that cannot communicate?

Then we have this as a coup d’é·tat

“you may believe from time to time that I am misdirecting you. I have made every effort to use words that are almost impossible to distort, but it is always possible to twist symbols around if you wish.      T-3.I.3

So, how does one “twist symbols around?”

One does this by taking the obvious meaning and telling us that it does not say what it is saying because it is a metaphor.

The bottom line is this:

Yes, words as symbols are imperfect and in the true reality, we will not even need them because communication will be instant and fully realized.

But that is not the case here. In this world words are our primary source of communication and can lead us to awakening if we do not alter their meaning to suit our preconceived notions.

A reader points out that there are numerus actual metaphors used un the Course.

My point wasn’t that ACIM does not use metaphors, for at times it does. But in actually using a variation of the word “symbol” over a hundred times and none for metaphor that it was placing emphasis on the symbolism of words for every word is a symbol of something, but not very word is a metaphor.

When the Course does use a metaphor, it is obvious to the reader that it is not to be taken literally, but then it says many things difficult for the average person to believe that actually should be taken quite literally. For instance, when Jesus said that faith could move mountains many thought it was just symbolic like a metaphor, but the Course sets us straight on this.

“It is hard to recognize that thought and belief combine into a power surge that can literally move mountains.” T-2.VI.9

“Why is it strange to you that faith can move mountains? This is indeed a little feat for such a power.” T-21.III.3.

So it goes with many statements in ACIM that are not obvious metaphors, but difficult to believe. Many will just dismiss them as symbolic and not to be taken literally when the intent was to be taken as written.

To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.

“Search” site:freeread.com

Access other articles associated with ACIM HERE

Join the ACIM Group on Twitter (X) HERE

Check out JJ’s books on Amazon HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Posts 2016-2022

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Check out JJ’s Facebook Group HERE

 

The Principle Behind Money

The Principle Behind Money

I received a lot of comment from my parable on money systems. Many thought that any type of fiat money system was to be avoided like the plague and we needed to switch to gold as the only one that is reliable.

Allow me to comment on a statement made by a reader. He said,

“What I find to be an overly religious zeal is your assertion that you know it all and are an expert in everything on every subject.”

The problem is that I have never made such an assertion. No one in this group that I know of is a recognized expert on money. In fact, almost every post made here on every subject is posted by someone who is not an expert. If one is not a recognized expert then should he just keep his mouth shut and let experts only speak?

I think we all know the answer.

One major problem we have in society is that the common people often see things more correctly than do the experts. Many of the experts and professionals cannot produce fruits that demonstrate that they are any closer to the truth than the man on the street.

Consider this. The psychologists who are experts on mental health have one of the highest rates of suicide.

Doctors, experts on health, die earlier than the rest of us.

Preachers, experts on spirituality, are caught in many scandals that average people shun.

Lawyers, experts on the law, misuse the law and corrupt it in ways that common people see is morally wrong.

Expert politicians put in charge of our money spend with such abandon that many average people see as obvious insanity.

Why are these and other professionals seen as experts when they are wrong more often than the amateurs?

The reason is this. An expert is a person who is recognized as having many facts pushed inside his head on a certain subject. An expert can be wrong more often than not but still be recognized as an expert because of training that has filled his mind with data.

Now more important than being an expert is to see correctly and set yourself on the side wherein truth lies. To accomplish this one must see the principle behind the sought after truth and pursue this. If one can see the principle then he doesn’t need that many facts to know the truth for as they preset themselves the facts will support the principle.

Now if one can touch the soul and see the principle behind one or two things then it will not be long before he can see the principle behind any subject he wants to investigate. This will then make him more accurate in seeing the truth of any subject than the average expert in that subject. A master of principles can start with knowing very little but if he sees the principle then all the experts in the world will not be able to defeat his arguments.

Now rather than argue hard facts about money I thought I would present the principles behind it. I believe I did this quite accurately with the parable on money. The arguments against my views on money have not tackled the principles presented but instead give an onslaught of data that can be interpreted a number of different ways. This is why I like to get as close as possible to the principles involved as once a principle is seen by two people it will be difficult to disagree. Once two people learn the principle of addition they will normally both conclude that 2+2=4.

The question we must now ask to make sense of this discussion we have been having is this. What is the principle behind money that gives it its value? The answer, as related in the parable, is labor. The reason labor is the core principle is that everything money can buy is created by labor including labor itself. A new car, for instance, is the product of labor mining the steel, fabricating it, transporting it and selling it.

If you buy a Big Mac you are really buying the labor of the cattle rancher who raised the beef, the farmer who raised the wheat for the bun, the labor of the people who prepared it and many other items. The core principle of labor is involved in anything we buy.

Now many people say that money must be represented by a precious metal, most often gold. The reason that gold is so often associated with money is it is discovered and not created. Whereas the creation of a commodity has many stages of labor involved as well as many different laborers the possession of gold can be had in only one step. A person can go to a stream with a gold pan and just find it himself. As little as one step by one laborer is involved in this. Overall the search and mining for gold is very labor intensive making it closely associated with labor and thus often used as a source of money to procure labor and that produced by labor.

Because gold and precious metals are so close to the principle of labor they are often seen as a substitute for labor and thus a means to back up money that buys labor.

But what was illustrated in the parable is the difference between backing up money with gold and labor. Even though gold is as little as one labor step away from possession, it still requires labor to gather and store. On the other hand, labor does not have depend on the existence of gold or any other metal. If a group is willing to work then the labor is instantly available. One does not have to waste time in finding the gold first.

Does it make sense for a group with no gold to sit around and do nothing because they cannot create money backed by this metal? No, it does not. It makes absolutely no sense. The group in the parable did the logical thing. They created a money system not backed by gold for there was no gold for them. Critics would say that it was wrong for them to create a money system based on a fiat and would apparently be happier with them sitting around all day doing nothing.

As is often the case though the second group at first thought they were at a disadvantage because they had no gold, but they found the substitute closer to the true principle than the gold standard and thus finished their city much faster than the group who had the gold mine.

The Japanese exemplify the principle of labor. After World War II their country was devastated and they had comparatively little land and scarce resources. They did though have a great desire to labor and get paid for what their labor was worth. Today they have created a financial empire that is the envy of the world and they did this without the gold that Russia has, and without the oil that Saudi Arabia has and without the land that Mexico has. They excelled over these nations which had more advantages because they believed in the power of their own labor.

Because it is labor that creates wealth then labor is the optimum ingredient to back money. Unfortunately none of the money systems of the world have their currency based on labor. Instead, they are based on decrees from the various governments. If we had one based on labor and the labor backed money is released according to the amount of labor needed to create the desired products and services then the money will be stable. If law governs the release of money so it roughly equals the value of anticipated labor then the most viable money system is manifested.

Too many people miss the silver lining because they’re expecting gold. — Maurice Setter

Feb 25, 2008

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Check out JJ’s Facebook Group HERE

Follow JJ on Twitter @JosephJDewey HERE

Check out JJ’s videos on TikTok HERE

The Parable of Money Systems

The Parable of Money Systems

A master teacher called his 144,000 servants before him and spoke.

“I am dividing you into two groups and want each group to build a city for me. You are to start with nothing but your own wisdom and strength and the land that I will grant to you which shall be sufficient for your needs. By cooperating and working together you can build a beautiful city that will glorify the kingdom.”

“Each group will apply themselves a little differently according to their own intelligence and in the end one will be more effective than the other. The results of the contrast between the two methods will teach us a valuable lesson.”

The teacher then directed them to the land they were to occupy and gave them some time to move their possessions thereon. After they were settled in and camped in tents they were instructed to begin.

For a few days nothing much happened for there was no leadership and each group of 72,000 had many contrasting ideas of how to proceed. Finally, both groups decided to elect leaders, for without leadership they seemed to be like ships adrift at sea with no rudder.

They spent the next few weeks electing leaders on several levels that gave the groups capacity to govern the whole. After this the presidents of both groups called their people together and gave similar messages:

“My Friends,” said one of them. “Our master teacher has given us a great assignment, but so far all we have done is gather, get settled in and elect leaders. Now is the time for action. We must now proceed.”

“But how are we to proceed?” asked a member of the audience. “All we have is the bare necessities to survive let alone build a city.”

The President spoke, “Apparently our teacher thinks we have the ability to create the tools and gather all; the ingredients to build a city. Yes, it will take a lot of work and ingenuity, but I believe we can succeed and make our teacher proud. We must therefore divide into work groups and proceed with making tools and gathering the needed raw materials.”

Both groups created assignments of duty and proceeded, but after a short time the leaders became painfully aware that the work was proceeding very sluggishly. Both presidents sent consultants to investigate the problem and both received a similar report. Said one, “The people are complaining. Many are slow or reluctant to work because their fellow workers are not doing their share. Everybody is waiting for the other guy to work before he works.”

“The problem,” said the President, “Is the Teacher gave us no money to begin this project so we are left with working with natural motivation to get the job done.”

A consultant responded, “We’re finding out without pay the people will do very little for the group good. We need some type of money to pay them with. If we had money we could get them to work.”

The President rose up, walked back and forth, and spoke, “If its money they need then its money they shall have. We will create a money system and pay the workers. Have the consultants draw up a plan.”

Up to this point the two groups proceeded similarly. However, the two groups of consultants came up with two plans for the creation of money which were very different.

The first group of consultants approached their President. “Sir, we believe that we cannot create real money out of thin air. It has to be backed up by something tangible such as a precious metal.”

“Suppose we had all the people deliver all their belongings to a central storehouse and we use these as backing for money,” said the President.

The head consultant spoke, “Taking what little they have would have to be done by force and even if we could do this their possessions are few and there is not enough to create the money we need.”

“What do you suggest then?” said the President.

“Even though we do not have the precious metals now we can get them. There is gold in the nearby hills that we can mine. As soon as we get a supply we can then issue money which is backed by a real tangible material – gold. We can mine the gold, store it in vaults and then issue money to pay for labor. We know the people will work for money so at that point the work can proceed as we direct.”

“It’s quite possible the other group will have this same idea. Is there enough gold for both of us?” asked the President.

“The area where the gold is located is only large enough to accommodate one group. If two of us go at it then we will be at each other’s throat,” said the consultant.

“Then we must secure the area immediately and claim it for ourselves,” said the President.

The first group then proceeded to lay a claim to the area wherein lied the gold, built a fence around it and set guards so only their group could have access. After this most of the group began participating in mining for gold.

Around this time the second president called his consultants together and contemplated the same problem. When one of them proposed creating money backed by gold another answered, “Unfortunately, the other group has moved forward with this idea and has staked out a claim on the only gold in the area. The only way for us to obtain gold is to go to war with them.”

“That’s out of the question,” said the President. “There must be another way. Are there more precious metals available to mine we could use?”

“None that we know of.”

“Is there any other way that we can create money then? Speak if any of you have ideas.”

“There is another way,” said another consultant. “We can create it out of thin air.”

“That sounds outrageous,” said the President. “Surely you can’t be serious.”

“I’m very serious,” said the consultant. “Actually, the creation I am talking about is not really out of thin air at all, but it can seem that way to those who believe that the only real money is backed by a precious metal.”

“You’ve got my interest. Tell me your plan.”

The consultant moved forward and spoke, “My plan will not only create real usable money, but it will save us all kinds of useless time digging for gold and storing it. This will allow us the advantage of completing the city much faster than the other group.”

“I see your point,” said the president. “The other group is now spending all their time digging for gold and this shall continue for heaven knows how long. If we can avoid doing this then we shall have an advantage indeed. How do we proceed?”

“Here is how it works. We will issue money by fiat but it will have value unlike money printed up by some guy on his own in a basement.”

“How is that?” said the president.

“The fiat money will be backed by the people’s good faith in the government of our perspective city and each dollar will represent not gold, but labor. Each twenty dollar bill will represent an average of an hour’s labor.”

“So how do we distribute the money?”

“We just print up what we will need to keep people employed and enter the bills in circulation as needed to pay for their labor. Then as the money re-circulates we will need to introduce smaller amounts, but only what is needed to maintain a stable balance.”

“I see two possible problems,” said the President. “Something could happen to take the money out of circulation producing deflation or we could have unscrupulous people in the government print up too much money and we would have inflation where the dollar would lose its value.”

“But that’s a danger around the creation of money by any means,” said the consultant. “If the other group has their gold stolen or they print up too much money in relation to the gold supply then they face the same problem we do. In fact, other kingdoms have had this problem with money related to gold since paper notes have existed.”

“The only way to make sure our money remains stable is responsible oversight. There is no other way with any paper currency.”

“I see your point,” said the President. “I also see another advantage that may have escaped you.”

“What’s that?”

“If there was a large gold discovery or if our alchemists solved the problem of transmuting gold then the value of the other group’s money would plunge and their society could be destroyed.”

“Yes, that is a possibility,” said the consultant.

“But the value of an hour’s labor is always worth an hour’s labor and our dollar can remain steady as long as the money supply is wisely measured.”

“That is correct,” said the consultant.

“Then let us proceed,” said the President. “We will dispense with the wasted time of mining for gold and immediately begin work on gathering materials for the city.”

The second group then explained the program to its citizens and paid the workers in fiat money as they commenced labor. Within a short period of time the whole community was bristling with activity and the foundations to the city began.

When the first group saw that the second group had already laid the foundations to the city while they were still mining for gold they became alarmed. This alarm reached the President and his consultants.

“What is this?” said the first President. “The other group has reached full employment and has not only gathered raw materials but is laying the foundation to their city. All this has been accomplished while we are still mining for enough gold to create sufficient backing to employ the kingdom.”

A consultant stepped forward and explained, “There’s nothing to worry about. We have done some research and discovered the second group is not using real money. They are using fiat money which is just manufactured out of thin air.”

“What do you mean thin air? How does thin air get the jump on us in creating full employment and building a city?”

“They are cheating, sir and their cheating will soon catch up with them. Because their money is not based on gold or any tangible commodity it will only be a matter of time before their system collapses completely. Then we can offer then some of our gold, buy up all their materials and be the first to complete the city.”

“Are you sure about this?” asked the President. “It looks like the people are convinced they are getting real money and as long as they are convinced, they will keep building the city.”

“But they are fooled by a deceptive government and bankers,” said the consultant. “We shall expose them and the day will soon come that their house of cards will come tumbling down.”

Both groups then proceeded with their various philosophies on money. It took a year of struggle and sacrifice before the first group mined sufficient gold to create a viable money system but even after this they had to keep a portion of their people mining for gold to keep new gold infused into the system. These people who mined the gold were unable to perform any labor that contributed to the building of the city.

Two years passed and several times it looked like both money systems would fail. It turned out there was criminal negligence on both sides but the leadership of both governments were upright enough to catch their mistakes and correct them.

Each time the second group has any problem with their money the first group relaxed their labors thinking there would soon be a collapse and they would soon own the materials of both cities. But it turned out that both the fiat and the gold backed money had the same problems and both required honest government to insure that the people could prosper.

Another year passed and the second group had completed a beautiful city with housing for all the inhabitants. The city of the first group was only half done and many homes lay unfinished.

At this time the teacher called the leaders of both groups to appear before him.

“I see that one group has completed a beautiful city and the other has not. Tell me what has made the difference here?”

The President of the first group stepped forward and explained. “Sir, the second group has cheated. They paid their group with funny money created from nothing. We created our money from gold stored in vaults and it will retain its value while the economy of the other group will soon come crashing down and then we will buy the whole city for pennies on the dollar.”

“But I see before me a beautiful city,” said the teacher. “Such beauty is not created from nothing. Perhaps the other president can explain.”

The second President stepped forward and explained. “You are right sir; this city was not created from nothing. We issued money that was backed by the good faith of the people in their own labor. Labor may not be visible as is gold, but it is not nothing. As proof look and see what our money backed by labor has produced.”

“I understand you had a culprit that printed up some extra money for selfish ends,” said the teacher.

“Yes,” said the second President, “but so did the other group. We both had some problems because of it and we both made corrections.”

“I see,” said the teacher. “So you both had viable money systems and honest government. How do you explain the fact that you finished your city so much faster than the gold standard group?”

The second President answered, “Because gold in a vault by itself does not produce anything, but takes away many productive labor hours to mine and refine. We took all those hours and spent them building the ingredients of a city that adds joy to the lives of the inhabitants. Gold in a vault by itself accomplishes nothing.”

The first President then became very angry and exclaimed, “My teacher, you do not understand. We have the only viable money system. This other money system is based upon lies. Just wait another year or so and their system will completely collapse and we shall buy up the whole thing. Then we shall own both cites.”

The teacher contemplated and responded, “My friend, do you not see the wisdom of the second group who are relying on the value of labor rather than visible objects?”

“But sir, their money is fiat money built upon nothing!”

The teacher thought again and responded, “Then perhaps I must teach you where the real value of money lies.” He then took an ancient scroll from a table and handed it to the second President. “Here is the formula for transmuting lower elements into higher ones. With this you can make all the gold, silver and other metals you wish. You can pave the streets of your city with gold if you wish.”

The first President spoke again, his voice quaking, “If he makes enough gold to pave his streets then there will be so much gold our money will become useless and the effort we have made will come to an end. Please don’t do this to us.”

“I am not hurting you. You are hurting yourself,” said the teacher. “I am also giving you the opportunity to pave your streets with gold. All you have to do is learn your lesson that labor will always have value, a value that will outlast gold or any other commodity. Have faith in the labor of your brothers and you shall prosper and pave your streets with gold, otherwise your people will rebel against you and your fate shall be a terrible thing.”

After thinking long and hard the first President swallowed his pride and sought to change his money system to be based on the labor of his brethren. It was not long before the cities were completed and both had streets of gold that sparkled in the sun.

The best way to predict the future is to invent it. Alan Kay

Feb 20, 2008

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Check out JJ’s Facebook Group HERE

Follow JJ on Twitter @JosephJDewey HERE

Check out JJ’s videos on TikTok HERE

Male-Female Polarization

Male-Female Polarization

One of my more controversial teachings concerns the difference between males and females when seen as energies.  That is the female has a tendency to focus more on receiving/learning and the male on sending/teaching.

I thought I’d make a few comments of clarification on this as this teaching probably rubs some females the wrong way more than any other I have given out.

First, I do not think I have every written anything to discourage female from becoming better teachers. As far as teaching our children are concerned, there are more female teachers than male, but even here as far as energy goes a female teacher is male to the child which is female in energy by comparison.

Here are a few things I have written in previous articles:

“We must remember that each of us possesses both of these energies no matter which body we occupy. We must all play out roles of being both sender and receiver, but our souls are attracted to either a male or female body in a certain life because, at that point in time, our life force is charged or polarized in that direction; this charge fluctuates in us all from life to life. Thus, if one presently finds herself in a female body, this is an indication that her soul needs to be polarized in that energy to achieve maximum progress and fulfillment through learning and receiving. If one finds himself in a male body, then he must be a sender, initiator, and teacher to satisfy his soul direction. To achieve complete fulfillment, however, we must balance and use both energies within us. The fact that we find ourselves in either a male or female body is merely a statement of our soul’s intention that one or the other energy should be dominant, and that we should place our attention there.”

“It does seem that the best and the worst of people in our history have been males. It is a fact that those who have initiated causes and have led humanity to great heights and depths have usually been in male bodies. There are exceptions, but even if an advanced entity finds itself initiating a great cause in a female body, she must do so using male energies, for all initiating energies are male, as we shall soon explain. Thus, the most notable persons in history who have appeared to accomplish great works (good or bad) have been male, such as the Buddha, Christ, Abraham Lincoln, Edison, on one end and Nero, Mussolini and Hitler, and others.

 

“So ladies — do not forego initiating because that is ‘a man’s job.’ There is equal opportunity here. Sometimes male and female will work together, as my wife and I do in many areas, and sometimes you must act as an individual. Madame Blavatsky was in a female body yet was a much more powerful initiate and leader than was her husband.”

Summary:

A male or female polarization is only partial and not complete. We all have both energies and if the situation requires it the male can concentrate on receiving and the female on sending.

A reader brought up the interesting possibility that Christ could come as a female.

Does this mean that he would only be supporting males as senders?

No.

Would this mean that he would not use male energy and teach us?

To get an idea of how he would perform his mission as a female look at how Alice A. Bailey or Madame Blavatsky performed their work. Each of them were the head of their organizations which they initiated and spent countless hours in teaching and expounding. Yet as evidence of their female polarization look at that for which they are best known. The most notable aspect of both of them is their claim that they received most of their material from a Master. This fact overshadows any male projection they gave out because they were polarized in the female energy.

Readers may find it of interest to examine me as a teacher in the male energy and how it differs from past female teachers. Seekers do not know for sure whether I have met higher beings or not or where the teachings I give out come from. Because I am polarized in the male the attention is on my sending and not the receiving. Readers often wonder at first about my sources, but then as they get into the teachings it does not matter to most of them that much.

If Christ were to come in female body he would indeed teach and initiate, but we would be strongly directed to one higher than he. You’ll notice that Jesus attempted to give recognition to one higher than himself but it didn’t stick as it did with Alice A. Bailey largely because he was in a male body. If he were to come in a female body there would be a lot of attention given to his link in the Molecular Order — which would be the Ancient of Days or one of his associates.

“He who joyfully marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice.” Albert Einstein

Feb 15, 2008

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Check out JJ’s Facebook Group HERE

Follow JJ on Twitter @JosephJDewey HERE

Check out JJ’s videos on TikTok HERE