Molecular Flow and Animals
A reader wanted me to give more light on the difference between humanity having a molecular connection vs. not having one and its effect on the animal kingdom.
I’ll attempt to paint a word picture to give a little more knowledge.
Humankind is at a midway point between the lower and higher lives in the universe. Within the universe itself human type lives compose its soul. As such they are the transmitters of life energy to the living kingdoms below human. As humanity progresses even so does the animal, vegetable and mineral progress.
It is an interesting esoteric fact that the animal and vegetable life cannot exist in any form except maybe a one celled life — without the presence of man. This presence does not have to be in the dense physical, but may be in higher etheric matter.
As a transmitting agent man sends intelligent force to the lower kingdoms that stimulates evolution until dense human forms are created.
After human forms are created in the dense physical and human intelligences incarnate therein the consciousness is focused downward for many incarnations and they are thus disconnected from the energy flow from the higher lives. This affects the kingdoms under man.
When the molecular order is created and humanity receives again its natural flow of energy, such energy will trickle down to the lower kingdoms. This overflow of molecular energy will not be obvious until the molecular link is secure and imperious to destruction. After the first human cell is created the lower kingdoms will then enjoy a noticeable effect.
Then will come the time that the lion shall lay down with the lamb and the earth will bring forth a natural abundance for the animals, and the survival of the fittest will no longer apply as it does today.
The vegetable kingdom will produce with great abundance. The molecular humans as a group will achieve a higher contact with the animal, vegetable and mineral kingdoms, and will be able to direct their progression until the whole earth itself is transformed into a real Garden of Eden.
Animals & Nature
A reader gave the opinion that animals do best in nature and the more we help them the worse of they are.
He gave a different slant on animals in nature than I was leading to, but it was interesting and he directs us toward the truth that the closer we can get to nature the greater the benefits.
It is also interesting to correspond the animals in his account to people. As soon as they feel that someone will take care of them, they start getting lazy and lose the ability to take care of themselves.
His point in taking care of ourselves carries over into diet. In most cases everything we do to alter our food supply actually decreases the quality. Those into natural foods believe that the closer the food is to the natural state the more nutritious it is and the more trace elements. Wild berries are better than cultivated ones. The same with wild herbs. Some wild ginseng is so rare and potent that it glows in the dark and is worth thousands of dollars an ounce.
When I said that nature often doesn’t take that good of care of its own, I didn’t mean that nature doesn’t supply the most nutritious ingredients, but nature’s harvest is often in short supply. Wild animals often starve or freeze to death in the winter or get burned in forest fires in the summer. Either way the suffering is intense and makes one feel sorry for them.
Djwahl Khul once said that the human kingdom will be the savior of the animal kingdom. This idea runs totally contrary to the views of many modern environmentalists many of whom see humanity as a virus that needs to be eliminated.
On the other hand, humanity is a part of nature and I think we will eventually achieve correct balance with our environment. When this is achieved, we will assist the animals in a natural way so they will be able to lead carefree lives in relative abundance with much less pain and suffering than is now the case.
I raised chickens and pigs when I was a teenager. My chickens were truly free range and ate lots of bugs and grass but had no trouble gorging themselves on any grains I gave them. The pigs I raised would eat just about anything that’s organic. When I was first married, I got a goat to mow our lawn. That was a good deal for me. I got out of mowing the lawn and got some goat milk in return. She loved grass, but would certainly wolf down any grain I would feed her.
On the other hand, I have no trouble in believing that an animal totally dependent on nature will prefer the natural foods.
Man is the only animal that laughs and weeps, for he is the only animal that is struck with the difference between what things are, and what they ought to be. – William Hazlitt
Jan 15, 2010
To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.
“Search” site:freeread.com
Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE
Easy Access to All the Writings
For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE
JJ’s Amazon page HERE