Gays and the Zero Point
I received a comment on DK’s writings – that some seem to be politically incorrect.
DK wrote in a language acceptable to his day, but some are politically incorrect today and turn off many people. On the other hand, if you carefully read his writings you will see that there are many things he avoided saying as well as carefully worded phrases to be politically correct in his time. This is evidence that if he were to write in our day that his writings would be worded differently and be more palatable to this age.
The way to proceed with any teacher, especially a Master, is to look at the principle behind any teaching given out. Even many of the words of Christ, the greatest of us all, are politically incorrect by today’s standards, and if taken literally, without seeking an understanding of the underlying principle, would be rejected by this generation.
“He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me.”
I came not to bring peace, but a sword.”
“Let the dead bury the dead.” (speaking of funerals)
You may rest assured that when the Christ speaks to us again that his words will be more attuned to our generation than were his words in the Bible.
That said, readers may ask if I agree with the teachings of DK on homosexuality. The answer is this. I agree with the underlying principles behind his words, but if I were to teach those same principles I would write them much differently, and some I have already dealt with.
Several things he teaches does need some clarification. He calls homosexuality a perversion. This is indeed inflammatory language in our day and it also gives a wrong impression. The truth of the matter is there is perversion among both homosexuals and heterosexuals. Homosexual orientation is a natural occurrence caused by a sift in male/female energy which occurs as we move from live to life. Christian fundamentalists are wrong when they say our sexual identity is a choice. Once a person is born in a certain energy flow no choice can change it. He can only choose what he will do with the energy which is in circulation in his life.
Wrong use of the sexual energy whether one be straight or gay is where the “perversion” comes in. Perversion is a strong word in this age. It is better to say that wrong use of energy is merely a mistake that leads to less than a fullness of soul energy.
A second point that needs clarification is DK’s point that current homosexual perversions have their roots in ancient abuse of sexual energies in ancient Lemuria and other times.
The point of clarification is this.
As we go through various cycles of lives we live through cycles of male lives and then cross over to female and then back to male in cycles of seven waves. The standard gay who is the nice gentle harmless person next door is undergoing the crossover experience and is struggling with discovering who he is and where he fits in. This type of person is usually gay only one lifetime and then moves on and accepts his new sex in the next.
But there is another group, of which DK speaks who are strongly centered in the lower personality and do not see themselves governed by the standard rules of civilization. Many in this group are the militant gays who see their lifestyle as superior and attempt to force it upon others. Some of these can be spotted in gay pride parades wearing the most outlandish of costumes and exhibiting sexual overtones in front of all who will watch.
Some of these leftovers from the past stay in the homosexual mode for many lives as they are philosophically attached to it and refuse to move ahead in their cycles as encouraged by their souls.
That said, I have taught a number of principles governing gays which DK (or any other teacher I know of) has not elaborated on. Among them are.
(1) We all go through cycles of lives as male and female and most gays are in circumstance where they are crossing over from one sex to another. If he has just crossed over to the male gender then his inner consciousness is used to being attracted to the male and this inclination is difficult to dismiss.
(2) In each life we have a different charge of either male or female energy. The gay is close to the zero point, making it difficult to be attracted to the opposite sex. On the other hand, he or she has fewer distractions from the excess energy which allows him to focus on creative thinking with greater ease than many.
(3) The gay does not choose to be gay, but can choose how to handle his situation.
It is important that the gay understand the principles which govern his inclinations of attraction. He needs to contemplate and assess his life so he will understand whether he is evolving toward a greater polarization in male or female energy. If he discovers his male energy is increasing then he must understand that, in his next life, he will have an attraction toward the female and prepare his mind to accept this and avoid the mistake of the ancient Lemurians.
A reader brought up this scripture that I have previously referenced:
“For there are some eunuchs (gays), which were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men (castration): and there be eunuchs (gays and some hetros seeking the spiritual single life), which have made themselves eunuchs (a neutron, or balanced in energy) for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.” Matt 19:11-12
What evidence can we present that eunuchs born from their mother’s womb is referring to gays?
Quite frankly the evidence is very subtle. If it were obvious there would have been many before me who would have seen this and taught it.
The real confirmation of this is found in the Oneness Principle where all principles are revealed through the soul.
Even so, there is quite a bit of evidence from the scripture itself that this is a true interpretation.
Let us examine the dialog that led up to this verse:
Matt 19:7 They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?
Matt 19:8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so. Matt 19:9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. Matt 19:10 His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry.
Matt 19:11 But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.
Matt 19:12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.
Now notice the question that led to Jesus’ comment on Eunuchs. The disciples said:
“If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry.”
Then Jesus proceeded to talk about those men who do not marry a woman. He divides them into three categories.
(1) “eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb”
In other words, there are some who are born in such a state and inclination that they have no desire to marry a woman.
(2) “eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men.” These are men which have been castrated and also have no desire to marry or have sex with a woman – a common practice in that era.
Now it is obvious that the second category represents the standard idea of what a eunuch is, but the first one does not. Very few men are born in a condition similar to castration, but a large number of men are homosexual “from their mother’s womb,” or from the time of birth.
The differentiation between (1) and (2) is even more obvious when you realize that two different words are used, yet translated into the same English word.
The Greek word for eunuch in category 2 is EUNOUCHIZO is one which is castrated.
The word for eunuch in the first category is: EUNOUCHOS and this can sometimes refer to an unmarried man, not necessarily a castrated one.
Taking all this into consideration one must conclude that a EUNOUCHOS who never has a desire to marry, even from birth would be the homosexual.
Then Jesus ends with this statement:
“There be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.”
This third category is the spiritual seeker who seeks to dedicate himself to the kingdom of God by remaining single and abstaining from sex by the force of will. It is interesting that some of the early Christian saints such as Origin, actually did castrate themselves, thinking this would help them lead the spiritual life. Personally, a little will power seems a much more desirable route for those who make this choice.
Now notice that Jesus ends with this injunction: “He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.”
If one is able and comfortable with abstaining from marriage and sex to lead the spiritual life then it can be of spiritual benefit that he do so.
In other words, abstinence is not for everyone, but those who are able to abide it will have fewer distractions in leading the spiritual path.
It is interesting that many gays come to this conclusion on their own and have sought to become priests so they could dedicate themselves to God and not the lower self. As we have seen in recent news some have not all have been able to abide this path. On the other hand, many have been faithful priests and in the process done much to further the evolution of themselves and their associates.
Aug 13, 2003
Copyright by J J Dewey
JJ’s Amazon page HERE
Gather with JJ on Facebook HERE