Author: Joseph Dewey

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

The Greatest Mystery

May 19, 2026 Joseph Dewey

The Greatest Mystery

There seems to be some questions about my statement that there is no such thing as a first cause. Let me say a few words and then if there are additional questions feel free to ask.

First let me again state that I do not expect anyone to believe what I write just because I say it. Do not accept anything unless it feels right to your own soul and mind.

The beginning or no beginning to existence is perhaps the greatest mystery there is but logic and intuition can take us to certain realizations.

Some say there was a first cause. Let us go with this and see where it takes us.

If there was a first cause this means that before the first cause happened there was no cause. If there was no cause then there was no effect either. If there were no cause and no effect anywhere then there was nothing everywhere. For something to be created there has to be a cause that is already in existence. Without cause and effect nothing exists.

If nothing exists and there is no cause then there can be no effect of creation for creation demands a cause.

If there ever was a time that there was no cause and effect and no creation then it would be impossible for us to be here today. Nothing cannot create something.

Because of the very fact that we are here we can deduce that cause and effect have always been.

All that which has form has a beginning and an end to that form. Someday the universe will fold up and return to its essence but it will not return to nothingness or a state of no cause. Cause and effect will still exist and will create another universe after a period of pralaya.

A reader wants to know how something can exist beyond time and space.

An idea exists beyond time and space. An idea never had a beginning nor will it have an end nor does its essence occupy space or have a form. An idea incarnates into form. You are an idea in the mind of God.

The fifth plane up is the atmic, the plane where ideas are accessed. It has no time and space as we understand them. Time and space co-exist with this plane but are not a part of it. When an idea is not in physical form then it dwells apart from time but when it manifests in form it is subject to time and space.

Question: Is it then possible to say that “We” all humans are that God who started the whole creation? Therefore, the universe will never fold up again and have to start over????

JJ: We are a part of the body of God that created all things but where there is a beginning there will be an end. There is no end to beginnings and endings, however.

Question: Does God retrieve lessons, does he seek further wisdom? How to do better next time? This cycle around, which lesson or what point of evolution does God seek to attain? I imagine every level has a theme.

JJ: Yes, God seeks to progress. The best way to get hints as to what God wants to accomplish is to look within ourselves at what we want to accomplish – for we are in the image of God.

I would say that one of the main goals for God and man is the enhancement of the quality of relationships of one life toward another. God, the whole, wants to get closer to the parts, you and me.

There’s more of course, but this is food for thought.

Hints on Creation

Concerning that which gives rise to existence there are some good hints in the Immortal books. I’ll repeat one here.

John sipped his coffee, “My time is short so we need to get on with our lesson. Have you discovered who or what you are yet?”

“I think I have either found the truth or am close to it,” I said, leaning toward John. “When scientists examine matter they say that they cannot find proof that solid particles exist. All they can seem to find on the smallest level is wavelengths in motion. If all these wavelengths were to be stilled, the universe would virtually disappear. If the motion of the wavelengths that make me would be stilled, then I would probably cease to exist. Therefore, the real me has to be motion or action of some kind.”

“That’s very good,” said John. “Coming to this point is a milestone, but you are not there yet. Answer me this: What is it that is in motion and what is the force creating the motion?”

I thought a moment. “If there is no such thing as solid matter then nothing is in motion, if that is possible. I guess the force propelling the wavelengths is pure energy.”

“But,” said John, “if there is no solid matter, then nothing is in motion, as you say. Therefore, does it not stand to reason that energy is not required for motion since nothing is really in motion?”

“Maybe I was right after all,” Elizabeth chuckled. “I said half joking that we were nothing and perhaps I was right.”

“As far as the material plane goes, you are correct,” said John. “But from the greater reality you are a great something. That something which creates all motion in the universe is the great mystery. Energy is not the answer because in reality there is really nothing solid in motion.

“Now I will give you two major hints. First, in my hand I have a pen. Now I will take this pen and throw it on that sofa over there.”

John threw the pen on the sofa.

“Now, what made that pen fly over to the sofa?”

“Obviously you did,” I said

“And who or what am I? And don’t say John.”

“So the real you threw that pen?”

“Yes. That which is the real me made the pen move. This is the first major hint.

You can read the first Immortal book free at freeread.com which gives additional light on the subject.

I am patient with stupidity but not with those who are proud of it. – Edith Sitwell

May 24, 2012

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

The Evolution of the Universe

May 17, 2026 Joseph Dewey

Evolution of the Universe

A reader said he was not clear about the Universe of Eleven that was the foundation building block of the atom. The Grand Tour from Eternal Words has a lot of meat in it and you might have to read it several times to absorb it all.

In a nutshell here is the teaching.

In our far past we have advanced as high as the Universe of Eleven. When this reached relative perfection this universe then became the foundation for new universes that would evolve from a point clear up to the Universe of Twelve. Presently the advancement toward this goal has reached near the midway point in the present Universe of Seven. This Universe of Seven is built entirely on tiny particles much smaller than the atom patterned after the Universe of Eleven.

Our present goal is to perfect the current Universe of Seven, but this will not happen at the end of the current universe. When the current universe folds up and goes back to the singularity it will still be far from perfect. It will have to incarnate many more times before relative perfection can be achieved. Then after many more incarnations have passed this universe along with a mind-boggling number of other universes will gather together and create the Universe of Eight. This process will repeat itself until the Universe of Twelve is perfected. When this is complete then another great decision will be made.

Here is some of the dialog from my book Eternal Wo5rds which should be helpful.

CHAPTER NINETEEN

The Great Secret

I felt humbled and honored to be given permission to proceed. Even though this space we were entering was infinitesimally small, I had the sensation of entering a vast universe as we proceeded through the barrier. I also felt that the intelligence residing there was overwhelming, beyond words. This was a great mystery to me, as I thought that as we descended to smaller and smaller particles and life forms, the intelligence would decrease, not increase.

Another odd thing I noticed was the great silence. The reason I call it odd is it seemed as if I had been in great silence for some time. The only thing I heard since entering the microcosm were the thoughts of my companion and this was soundless by normal standards. It never occurred to me, until entering this unusual space, that there are degrees of silence, just as there are degrees of sound or noise. This space we just entered indeed had a silence unlike anything I have ever felt or imagined. It was so awe-inspiring that it took me a while to get used to it.

“This silence, it is amazing. What is the cause of it?” I asked.

The Ancient of Days ignored my question and responded, “I must step aside for now. You must commune with the intelligence here to pass your test.”

“Okay,” I thought with some delight. Apparently we had reached the smallest particle with which I was supposed to commune. I then directed the question toward this tiny life, which also seemed like a great life.

I waited and the response came. Again, it was not in the form of distinct words, but of high impression that I am now putting into words. “You are correct in surmising that there are degrees of silence, just as there are degrees of sound, “it said. “But from another angle – that which you normally call silence, is not silence. True sound is produced by vibration within the fabric of space. In all the universes and worlds you have visited, there has been such a vibration even though you do not register it in your consciousness. Only where space is not disturbed will you find true silence. When you went through the barrier you entered such space – space that is not disturbed with vibration, space wherein true silence dwells. In meditation deep, the master on your world can catch a glimpse of this silence, but many waves of silence must he cross to arrive at this great silence beyond silence.”

“Is this the peace that passes all understanding?” I asked.

“It does pass all understanding of the inhabitants of your universe; indeed, just a portion of the peace here is beyond their understanding.”

“I would think so,” I said. “My consciousness is here and I cannot take it all in. It is like a great magnetic force, and I can only take so much of it out of concern I could never leave. Knowing this peace will make regular silence seem like noise.”

“You will adjust upon your return,” he said.

As pleasant as the peace was, I found I had to ignore it to a degree to continue my quest. “Is this a part of the universe of three or could it be two or even one?”

“This is the foundation of all greater universes,” was the reply. “It is built upon three, two and the one. The one is the point in the center, the three is the barrier you crossed and the two is the holy space in between.”

“I was told to commune with the smallest particle, that which is our beginning. Is this our true beginning?”

“There is only a beginning to beginnings, but no true beginning,” was the reply. “This is the place you seek.”

“Is the point in the center just a point or does it contain something?”

“You may approach far enough to answer your question, but no further.”

Again, I concentrated on moving, and eventually the point increased in size until it became about as large as a beach ball before me. It appeared white and luminous, giving off rainbows of colors. I counted the colors and they were eleven in number. Four of them were colors I had never seen before, neither can I describe them outside of saying they were very bright. These four colors were not like a mixture of primary colors, but I got a sense they were primary colors unknown to the greater universe. “I seem to be able to go no further,” I said.

“This is as far as you or any other being from your universe is allowed to proceed. Even the Master who is with you can go no further.”

“Why would that be?” I asked, shocked

“Unravel the great mystery and you will know,” he replied.

“There’s not much to go on.”

“Yet you see eleven colors before you, four unknown to your universe. What does that tell you?”

I reflected and replied, “I came from a universe built upon the number seven and descended through the universe of six to five to four to three, and, finally to this foundation Trinity of Three-in-One. Now I see this ball before me having eleven colors. The number eleven seems like an odd encounter at this point and quite a gap from the other foundation numbers.”

“Think back to your teacher’s words. What follows the universe of seven?”

I was amazed that this tiny entity knew of John’s teachings. Perhaps it could read my mind, I thought as I replied, “He told me that after the universe of seven was perfected, we would create a universe founded upon the number eight, then nine, and finishing with twelve in untold ages hence.”

“Yes, and after the universe of twelve is perfected, what would happen then?”

I thought back and it came to me, “John said that at that point, another great decision would be made.”

“And when do you suppose was the previous great decision?”

“Would it have something to do with the number eleven and this orb I see before me?”

“Would it? Merge with Divine Thought and behold the mystery,” my small teacher encouraged

I stared at the orb and did my best to merge with the life I felt around me. As I looked at the orb I also concentrated on picking up something from it. Suddenly, enlightenment came. It was as if I had knowledge poured into my brain or soul. I knew the mystery and knew that I knew.

“Wow! I have it! This knowledge is fantastic, but I must say it completely boggles the mind. Everyone assumes the Creator is great, but they have no idea of the depth of our past or future.”

“And you know more than you did before and still it is as nothing,” said the entity. “Yet I cannot give you more, for your consciousness cannot handle it.”

“You are right,” I said. “My cup is full, and I could not contain any more at this time.”

“Tell your associate of your revelation. Tell it as you will later record it.”

I concentrated until I felt the presence of the Ancient of Days and said, “Let me tell you what I received, for I do wish to hear your comments. A key hint was given by the entity when he said; There is only a beginning to beginnings, but no beginning. This orb we see before us is the beginning and the end, the Alpha and Omega. It is the end of a great round of creation and the beginning point for all the greater universes. What we are looking at here is a universe of universes. This universe is much greater than our own, and yet, a part. If we were to slow time even more and enter this universe, we would find new galaxies and worlds all built upon the number eleven. Then, if we were to go smaller, we would find a universe of ten, then nine – clear down to another alpha and omega point like this one.”

“And how many colors would you see in that point when you approach it?” he asked.

I reflected and exclaimed, “Ten! There would be ten colors. This is fantastic to think about. Then, if we went smaller, we would go through a universe of ten, then to a universe of nine, to eight, seven, then down to another Alpha and Omega point.”

“And the number of creative colors of that point?” the Ancient One asked.

“That would be nine,” I said. “But then, if we repeated the process we would reach another Alpha and Omega particle of eight, then seven and so on, until we get to the true Alpha particle.”

“And would that be the beginning of creation or the beginning of beginnings?” he asked.

“The beginning of beginnings, I suppose. But,” I pondered aloud, “what could be in this beginning point from which a universe of universes are made?”

“I don’t know,” was the Ancient of Days reply.

“I never thought I could ask you a question to which you did not know the answer. What do you mean you don’t know?” I asked somewhat exasperated.

“There are Great Ones whose knowledge is unfathomable when compared to average humanity. Even so, there are many things kept from all lives in our universe, from the greatest to the smallest. We can use the Law of Correspondences and deduce what we would find if we descended into these micro universes. Even though we have not been there, we have assurance of the foundation numbers to the beginning Alpha. What is in that, we can only speculate. We know there are many universes there, but, upon what foundations they are built, we do not know. Some think the beginning Alpha has a foundation of twenty-four, while others think the foundation is something other than a number.”

“What could be without a number?”

“We know God is one,” he said. “Perhaps the early universes were built out of an essence with no separation, hence no numbers. We can only speculate now, but I will tell you this all will be known when the universe of twelve is perfected. That is so distant in the future; however, that it even puts strain upon me to think about it.”

I stared again at the orb in wonderment at how tiny it was in relation to the toothpick it was a part of; yet, at how vast it was, containing trillions of universes. “It looks like a perfect circle, yet the knowledge that was implanted in me tells me it is not. I sense there is something significant here. Can you explain?” I asked, hoping he could answer

“Part of the goal of the Great Decision was to create the perfect circle. The universe of eleven came very close, but is ever so slightly off. The perfect circle will manifest at the end of the Universe of Twelve. The Grand universe manifesting as the perfect circle will bring perfect understanding and recollection. We will then understand all things back to the first Alpha of numbers.”

“In the revelation, I was given knowledge so strange that I cannot comprehend it even though I have it within me. I saw that when the Universe of Eleven was finished, it was alone. There was only one of them, yet each molecule, atom and cell has untold billions of these points within them. How did the Universe of Eleven get from being one to a number so vast that all things are created from it?”

To this my guide replied, “When the Universe of Eleven was finished, its complexity and vastness far exceeded anything that is in our current universe. Yet, if you put enough space between you and a great universe, that universe, vast as it is, becomes only a tiny point. In the beginning, the Universe of Eleven manifested as the mind of God. At this time this was all there was in form existence. Think of the contrast. This tiny point was at one time all there was, but all there was formed a vast universe of universes. This mind of God within this past universe put distance between Itself and the universe, creating a ripple or wavelength in space that caused a wavelength and points to manifest in the fabric of space. Each of these points was an exact duplicate of the Universe of Eleven, caused by an explosive expansion of the mind of God. The numbers of these points were great, so great in number that it is beyond imagination. These created all there was in the greater universe, through gathering together and intelligently organizing.”

“This is amazing,” I said. “You mean to say at the end of the Universe of Eleven, there was only one of these tiny points floating in space until they multiplied and created all there is including our universe?”

“That’s correct, but it did not seem like a tiny point at that time, but a vast universe.”

So this must have been the beginning of the Big Bang?

“Correct. The Universe of eleven is the mysterious singularity of scientific theory.”

Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects. – Will Rogers

May 15, 2012

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

The Mystery of Monads

May 16, 2026May 16, 2026 Joseph Dewey

The Mystery of Monads

Adam And do elemental lives have monads? If not, what is behind their vibration? Did they have an initial reflection, as monads.

JJ A monad is a point of life in the Divine Space which is the One Great life. Each monad has within it all the knowledge and programming [from a past creation] necessary to fulfill its potential creative end. There are human monads, deva monads and animal monads and they are as different as the seeds of a tree, a flower and a watermelon. Normally one will say that a flower grew from a seed but you do not normally say that a petal from the flower grew from a seed. Similarly, a tree grows from a seed but one does not associate a leaf growing from one.

Even so, the elemental lives are always part of a greater life that grew from a seed which is a monad.

Each piece from the vegetable and mineral kingdom did not come from a unique monad though lives that did develop from monads work with these kingdoms.

Question: Can you define what you mean by “‘piece’ from the vegetable and mineral kingdom”?

JJ Every creation that develops from a seed or monad is made from parts when it is developed. An acorn tree comes from a single acorn. But the seed creates the whole tree. It doesn’t just create leaves of branches or even other acorns. Instead, it has within it the elements of the whole tree. The parts do not develop from the seed as parts but as a part of the whole creation.

Even so, all living creation has various monads for the development of the whole rather than the parts.

Humans and devas have individual monads for each entity but when you get lower than human a monad may be over the development of groups of lives rather than a single life such as a fly or a blade of grass.

Various parts that create life may not have a monad but be influenced by one.

Question: Are there no thoughts of God/monads behind the mineral and vegetable kingdoms? Doesn’t there have to be a thought of God/monad behind each “organic” manifestation?

JJ Yes, but each thought creates a whole made of numerous parts that belong to that whole.

Question: Or….does there only have to be a thought of God/monad behind each idea of creation?

JJ When DaVinci created the Mona Lisa he had one thought of how the finished product would appear and in creating this he brought together numerous parts and colors and combinations. The thought of the finished product is like the monad. The inks, the canvas, the combination of colors and strokes were all effects of the influence of the one seed but not the seed itself.

Question: Is it the case then that – Humans, animals, and devas require or are endowed with individual monads. But lower lives [vegetable and mineral] only require a monadic thought or principle, which then develops the lower kingdoms?

JJ Animals share monads and souls. A flock of geese for instance operate through a group soul linked to a monad. Anytime creation goes beyond natural selection and becomes the product of intelligent design then a monad or a seed is developing somewhere.

Question: The human molecule of 24 and other combinations will attract “higher lives” waiting to “incarnate” through the molecular unit, creating opportunity for humans to identify with higher consciousness. These “higher lives” also have a monadic source, correct? This monad is of a higher order than the human/god monad, correct?

JJ You are correct.

Question: There are also planetary, solar, and galactic monads that then manifest as the indwelling Logoi of those respective vehicles?

JJ Yes, there would be monads behind entire planets, solar systems etc.

Question: I’m assuming monads have some role in helping manifest the lives of the sixth, fifth, fourth… Universes? Are you able to elaborate on the nature of monad relationship to these lower Universes?

JJ You must be staying awake nights with these heavy thoughts. Yes, there would be monads in the lower universes.

There are several classes of monads. In its initial state it is merely an undeveloped point in Divine Space. Monads which have developed over the eternities share a consciousness with the One Great Life and have the ability to stimulate the undeveloped monads as well as project themselves as souls and individual humans. According to DK there are 60 billion such monads for this earth, but there are an unlimited number of lesser and potential monads.

The Immortal Books

A reader says: I’m not usually one to be surprised or go on about something but something is seriously up with your book. What did you tap into and how you do all that?

It’s like some of it didn’t really come from you. Cause I been reading your posts for ages and it seems different.

I consider it something different between the books, and the group. Or something strange that don’t add up. You must have an unusual talent for writing or something.

Don’t get it. Where did all the character development come from? The more I think of it the more I think the whole structure of that book is amazing.

These should really be, a best seller. I don’t get why they aren’t more popular. I read books that are way more popular than this but not half as good.

How did you learn to write like that?

I am wondering if I am seeing things in it that are just not there or things that you never intended for there to be there.

JJ: Glad you were impressed. The series has not been a big seller and is entirely self-published but those who read it generally think it is among the best books they have read and can’t understand why it doesn’t outsell books like the Celestine Prophecy and Conversations with God. I think they still have potential to be big sellers when I finally hit on something that draws the attention of mainstream people.

As to my writing talent or style… It takes a different mindset to write The Immortal books than it does a regular post. I just write it the best that I am capable.

New readers can access the first book free at freeread.com.

While intelligent people can often simplify the complex, a fool is more likely to complicate the simple. – Gerald W. Grumet, MD

May 11, 2012

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

The Basic God

May 15, 2026 Joseph Dewey

The Basic God

A reader makes this comment:

“What could mankind do in 100-1000 years by observing survival knowledge born in organisms and then applying it in humans through DNA manipulation?”

JJ: When one contemplates the Law of Correspondences, he can see that doing this is indeed a possibility.

A human is born in a very helpless condition and needs a caretaker to do everything for him if he is to survive.

When an animal is born it is pretty much ready to go. After a calf or horse is born it will be running around within minutes and seems almost as smart as its mother. The animals have built in programming to assist them that we lack. Why is this?

Part of the reason may be that the animal kingdom has had a longer time to program themselves for survival.

It is true that we depend more on mind than instinct for our survival and perhaps as we progress we will program many things into our nature that does not exist within the animals. It is interesting to speculate what that may be but by using correspondences we can get an idea.

Since the animals are born with built in programming that makes them ready to go at birth then it is most likely human babies will wind up being born with greater and greater abilities as times goes on until a human may have the consciousness of an adult by the age of eight rather than 21 as it is now.

It is indeed food for thought.

Reader Comment: Arthur C Clarke seemed quite the visionary and initiate of his time…. “In a taped interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation in 1974, Clark is questioned by the interviewer as to how he believes the computer will change the future for the everyday person and what life will be like around the year 2001. Clarke accurately predicts many things which have become a reality, among them online banking, online shopping and other commonplace things. In responding to the interviewer’s question about how his [the interviewer’s] son’s life will be different, Clark responds: “He will have, in his own house, not a computer as big as this, [points to nearby computer], but at least, a console through which he can talk, through his local computer and get all the information he needs, for his everyday life, like his bank statements, his theater reservations, all the information you need in the course of living in our complex modern society, this will be in a compact form in his own house … and he will take it as much for granted as we take the telephone.” Source of Quote

JJ: This was one of the most accurate predictions I have ever read. On the other hand, space travel has not progressed anything like he predicted for 2001. His writings show what could have been if we had continued financing the space program like we did in the Sixties.

Intelligent Design

Reader: I don’t get your logic here JJ. So, because the human body is inconceivably complex and can reproduce itself it therefore had an intelligent designer?

I don’t understand everything about the moon, nor do I know how it came into existence. But According to your above logic it was also intelligently designed. I’m not saying I’m an Atheist, nor am I saying God can’t be logically proven, only that I don’t see how the ladder of logic flows from your premises to their conclusion.

What am missing?

JJ The Difference between the moon and the human cell is like the difference between a snowflake and an iPad. One is an accumulation of natural patterns, the other an accumulation of design that had to come from some source.

Reader: Yet the indwelling entity/monad of the moon is of a much higher order than the indwelling entity/monad of the human cell, or even the indwelling entity/monad of a human individual? So the moon’s monad only requires a vehicle which is an accumulation of natural patterns in order to eventually manifest full intelligence/glory while the cell is glorified through incredibly complex design and its own evolution?

And the correspondence would seem lacking from the standpoint that the snowflake’s monad is nothing compared to the monad of the iPad7?

Am I missing something?

JJ: You are missing the fact that the moon is a dead decaying body and the monad, the logos and the intelligent lives that once lived on it are long gone. Now the moon has little evidence left of design but still has its natural patterns of creation.

On the other hand, the earth is a living planet composed of lots of things that give evidence of intelligent design, not the least of which are humans such as you and me. It also has a monad and logos incarnated into its body which is lacking on the moon.

A computer shows evidence of intelligent design though it doesn’t have an incarnated monad or logos – and it does have elemental lives involved.

If you can find a path with no obstacles, it probably doesn’t lead anywhere. – Frank A. Clark

May 8, 2012

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Interview with a Reptile

May 14, 2026 Joseph Dewey

Interview with a Reptile

A reader asked me to check out the Interview with a Reptilian. I finally got around to reading it and it was quite interesting.

Basically the article is about a claimed interview with a female member of the reptilian species who goes by the name of Lacerta. She claims the reptilian race never went extinct but have gone under the earth and many of them live in great caverns that house underground cities.

Lacerta says they have the power to mask their true form so when they appear among humans they are seen as regular humans. On the other hand, they cannot mask themselves from photos which will reveal their true form. Here is a description of the way they look when unmasked.

As I’m female I have also two breasts [despite our reptile origin, we have started to give milk to our babies during the evolution process – this happened around 30 million years ago – because this is the best thing to keep the young alive. Evolution had done this for your species already in the dinosaur age and a little bit later also for ours. That means not that we are now real mammals] but the breasts of us are not as large as those of human woman and the size of them is generally equal for every female of my kind. The external reproduction organs are for both sexes smaller then those of humans, but they are visible and they have the same function as yours [another gift of evolution to our species].

My skin is mainly of a green-beige color – more pale green – and we have some patterns of brown irregular dots [each dot of the size of 1-2 centimetres] on our skin and in our face [the patterns are different for both sexes but females have more, especially in the lower body and in the face]. You can see them in my case as two lines over the eyebrows crossing my forehead, at my cheek and at my chin.

My eyes are a little bit larger then human eyes [for this reason, we can see better in the darkness] and usually dominated from the large black pupils, which are surrounded from a small bright-green iris [males have a dark-green iris]. The pupil is slit and can change its size from a small black line to a wide-open egg-shaped oval, because our retina is very light sensitive and the pupil must compare this. We have external round ears but they are smaller and not so curved as yours, but we can hear better because our ears are more sensitive for sonic [we can also hear a wider range of sonic]. There’s a muscle or “lid” over the ears which can completely close them [for example under water].

Our nose is more pointed and there is a V-shaped curving between the nostrils, which enabled the ancestors to “see” temperature. We have lost most of this ability, but we can still feel temperature much better with this “organ”. Our lips are shaped like yours [those of females a little bit larger then those of males] but of a pale brown color and our teeth are very white and strong and a little bit longer and sharper then your soft mammal teeth. We have no different hair colors like you [but there is a tradition to color the hairs in different ages] and the original color is, like mine, a greenish brown. Our hairs are thicker and stronger then yours and they grow very slow. In addition, the head is the only part of our body where we have hairs.

Our body, arms and legs are similar in shape and size to yours, but the color is different [green-beige, like the face] and there are scale-like structures on the upper legs [over the knee] and upper arms [over the elbow]. Our five fingers are a little bit longer and thinner then human fingers and our skin on the palm is plain, so we have no lines like you but again a combination of a scale-like skin structure and of the brown dots [both sexes have the dots on the palm] and we have no fingerprints like you. If you touch my skin, you will feel that it is smoother then your hairy skin. There are small sharp horns on the upside of both middle fingers. The fingernails are grey and generally longer then yours. You see that my nails are not so long and round at the top. This is because I’m female. Males have sharp pointed nails with a length of sometimes 5 or 6 of your centimetres.

The following feature is very different from your body and part of our reptilian origin: if you touch the backside of my upper body you will feel a hard bony line through my clothing. This is not my spine but a very difficult shaped external plate-strucure of skin and tissue following exactly our spine from the head to the hip. There is an extremly high number of nerves and large blood vessels in this structure and in the plates [which are around two or three centimetres long and very touch sensitive, this is the reason why we have always problems to sit in chairs with a back like this chair.] The main task of these small plates [beside a role in our sexuality] is simply the regulation of our body temperature and if we sit in natural or artificial sunlight, these plates become more bloodfilled and the vessels become wider and the sun is able to heat up our reptilioid blood [which circulates through the body and through the plates] for many degrees and that gives us a great pleasure. Oh, we have no navel, because we were born in a different way to your mammal birth. [End Quote]

She gives an interesting take on the history of the planet I have not heard before. She says that 65 million years ago the dinosaurs were not killed by a meteor but by two species of aliens fighting over earth so they could mine its copper. One of them was humanoid and the other was reptilian. The war ended with the reptilian species detonating a fusion bomb that was more potent than expected and almost destroyed all life on earth.

I do not think this person interviewed a real reptile. Most likely it was a work of fiction. I do think that some of the things revealed in this treatise is true. For instance, I think it is correct that the earth is not hollow with a central sun but there are hollow parts. I think this is good material to read over and run by your soul for stimulation.

One thing did find irritating was the commentary by Michael & Stephanie Relfe. They kept telling me what to think of what Lacerta was saying and commented from a fundamentalist point of view.

You can read the full interview HERE

Some people get lost in thought because it’s such unfamiliar territory. – G. Behn

April 29, 2012

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Failure to Communicate

May 13, 2026 Joseph Dewey

Failure to Communicate

A reader makes this comment: What I was trying to point out is that this sort of Internet communication is a relatively new-fangled thing for humanity and we haven’t learned yet how to accurately inject the equivalent of the non-verbal cues that soften face to face communication – those non-verbal cues that allow the hearer to more accurately determine if you are using sarcasm, or are entirely sincere. Therefore, the probability of accurately getting the real intent of a communication with only black and white letters is probably pretty low.

JJ: I had several misconceptions of the internet when I first came on board. One thing I thought that would be really great about it, and an advantage over in-person communication, is that one can avoid impulsive and hurtful speech because when you write you have more time to think than when you speak. If you write something that is hurtful you have time to erase it before you send. On the other hand, many relationship problems occur because of impulsive speech that one may wish he hadn’t said and you cannot take back.

I therefore assumed that discussions on the internet would wind up being friendly and reasonable most of the time. Boy, was I wrong, especially concerning forums where people can post anonymously. There they insult each other to the degree that a major fistfight would occur if done in person. Even in a forum such as ours, composed some of the best people on the planet who are seeking spiritual love and truth, the words exchanged are sometimes hurtful and not too well thought out.

You make a good point that internet discussions do have disadvantages for in-person you can see a person’s facial expressions, his eyes, hear his inflections, tone of voice, feel the emotion in the voice etc. When we talk in person we have a better chance to tune in to all that the person is trying to say.

Even so, there is a lot of miscommunication both in person and on the internet. Unless two people are communicating through the soul there will be some misunderstanding and one must insure that he speak as accurately and with as much good will as possible.

Overall, I was very surprised to see how easily people were offended in internet discussions. Sometimes they are very offended at fairly harmless speech and read into statements meaning that was never there.

The bottom line is neither speech nor the written word is a panacea for perfect communication but we must always be vigilant to see that our words reflect our thoughts as accurately as possible with as much harmlessness as possible.

Swiss woman dies after attempting to live on sunlight

Interesting story here of a woman who lived about a year on sunlight before she starved to death. There have been reports though of those who have done this for a lifetime. Here is the report:

Swiss newspaper Tages-Anzeiger reports that a woman starved to death after embarking on a spiritual diet that required her to stop eating or drinking and live off sunlight alone.

The woman, aged in her fifties, is reported to have stopped eating and drinking in 2010 after watching a documentary about an Indian guru who claimed to have lived that way for 70 years.

Tages-Anzeiger says there have been similar cases of self-starvation in Germany, Britain and Australia.

The prosecutors’ office in the Swiss canton (state) of Aargau confirmed Wednesday that the woman died in January 2011 in the town of Wolfhalden in eastern Switzerland.

There is a foolish corner in the brain of the wisest man. – Aristotle

April 17, 2010

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Finding Balance in Life

May 12, 2026 Joseph Dewey

Finding Balance in Life

A reader comments: I am liberal and I also see, using JJ’s reasoning, that I have many conservative points of view. That being said, I can’t get into the dialogue about left versus right as to me it violates the Teachings that we must never be “anti” anything, but focus instead on our vision of the positive reality we wish to see manifest.

JJ: Talking about what is, is not being anti anything. It is being FOR the truth. I am pro truth wherever that truth may lie.

Then the reader wondered if we should avoid discussing politics or current news and focus only on spiritual teachings.

I think that when Christ does manifest that he will be very involved in politics so it is good preparation to be aware of all that is going on in the political field. After all, DK indicated that Christ may come as a politician. He said the Master Jesus will come as a leader of the Jews. Imagine how much conflict that would generate.

Reader: Are group members supposed to agree with your political views?

JJ: This is a very non authoritarian group. No one has to follow me in any way political or otherwise. All members should know that by now.

Reader: Are we expected to be civil in comments toward public figures as well as group members.

JJ Yes, of course. All are sons of God. Those who are not moderated are free to be civil or uncivil. If they get too far off base, I place them on moderation. I have always encouraged members to be civil to all. I do not think you can find an example where I have violated this injunction.

Reader: Do you ever worry that your postings might be influencing others to take polarized stands?

JJ: Not in the slightest. Why should I worry about that? Hopefully I have helped some become polarized toward Spirit and truth.

If members see any litmus test coming from me then they are probably in illusion. My only litmus test is that members be civil in discussions and not go too far off topic.

Any opinion is welcome as long as the person is civil and they are on topic. I expect all members to be loyal to their souls first and take what registers with their soul from me and others. I require no more than this.

Kris Why in this group is a test of political fealty eclipsing a standard of spiritual loyalty to service of God’s Plan for humanity? How has the former become more important here?

JJ There is no test of political fealty. Where do you get such an idea? It can’t be important if it does not exist.

Kris When you members make statements that reflect a Cult of Personality might be going on for some, should you correct it directly?

JJ I regularly discourage such things. Who do you think I should be correcting?

The reader then gave a quote from DK which he thought would set us on the right track: “I ask you also to sever your connection with all groups which are seeking to destroy and to attack, no matter how sincere their motive. Range yourself on the side of the workers for constructive ends, who are fighting no other groups or organisations and who have eliminated the word “anti” out of their vocabulary. Stand on the side of those who are silently and steadily building for the new order – an order which is founded on love, which builds under the impulse of brotherhood, and which possesses a realisation of a brotherhood which is based on the knowledge that we are each and all, no matter what our race, the children of the One Father, and who have come to the realisation that the old ways of working must go and the newer methods must be given a chance.” Esoteric Psychology, Vol 1, p. 188

We must ask ourselves in every group to which we belong, How does my group comply with DK’s admonishment and what role do I play in serving this end?

JJ: I wholeheartedly agree with DK here. You don’t want to head up any group activity that is anti something as its purpose of existence. In your quote he says:

“Stand on the side of those who are silently and steadily building for the new order – an order which is founded on love, which builds under the impulse of brotherhood.”

My teachings are about “steadily building for the new order” just as he says. Here are some of them:

[1] The Molecular Relationship. I have written an entire book on this which explains the next great step in human evolution and how we can be a part of it.

[2] The Molecular Business. This is a teaching that will make businesses more efficient, bring much more participation from the rank and file along with greater equality trough free will and not force.

[3] Project Peace and Goodwill. A plan to disarm the nations of nuclear weapons.

[4] The Gathering of Lights. Setting a positive goal to eventually build self sufficient cities of enterprising souls of good will.

[5] The Majority Speaks. A concrete plan to bring the will of the people into power rather than the will of the few as we have now.

[6] Thousands of articles that are not anti anything but present new and unique teachings that will be helpful in the new age.

Even though DK advised here to not have the idea of being against something as a prime reason for group formation he was against neutrality.

Even though the purpose of DK’s group was not to be Anti Hitler or anti totalitarianism he was definitely not neutral and definitely anti Hitler and all he stood for. He harshly criticized the United States for being neutral too long and not attacking Nazism earlier and was greatly relieved when we finally entered the war. He criticized the nations that remained neutral and were not anti anything and stated that they had accumulated negative karma they would have to pay off in the future.

He also harshly criticized the pacifists who were not against anything but conflict and noted how their freedom was paid for by those who were willing to take a stand on the side of liberty. He supported the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki which was far from a neutral action.

“The Hierarchy is NOT neutral.” DK The Destiny of Nations, Page 65

And I am not neutral. Just as DK did with his work I am doing with mine which is this. Give out positive teachings and building materials that will be useful in creating the new age. Like DK, when I find illusions, I will give out teachings to dispel them and that causes me to not be neutral as the Hierarchy is not neutral but to take a stand on the side of truth, freedom and justice.

Today we are in the midst of World War III except it is being played out on the astral plane rather than the physical. Just as DK insisted disciples take a stand during World War II, even so must disciples take a stand in the emotional war going on now which if lost could spell a loss of freedom just as the loss of World War II would have.

Any involvement I have on the political side of things is not leaving spiritual things behind, but embracing the key to all spiritual progress which is the defense of freedom. I will defend the freedom of the human spirit wherever there is opportunity, and the dispelling of political illusion is a large part of this.

Truth always originates in a minority of one, and every custom begins as a broken precedent. – Will Durant

April 22, 2012

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Sending and Receiving Love

May 11, 2026May 11, 2026 Joseph Dewey

Sending and Receiving Love

A reader touched on a point worthy of comment. He talked about the importance of love, which is of course something we all accept but then he touched on the importance of projecting love through our communications so the other party will feel or at least sense it.

As a group this is something that we should be placing more attention on. Now I’m not singling out any individual here but speaking to the group as a whole.

From time to time we have disagreements and that is fine. Anyone posting should feel free to respectably disagree with me or any other member without being seen as the bad guy.

Then from time to time those disagreements evolve into attacks, irritation, hurt feelings and sometimes outright anger. That is not so fine.

We can take some consolation in the fact that most every group that discusses anything controversial has this happen, but I would like to think that we can be better than most groups.

The key to doing this is to communicate in the spirit of kindness and love even when we disagree or think the other person is out of line. I have attempted to set the example for the group in this area. People have strongly challenged me, disagreed with me and attacked me through the years and I have never responded with name-calling or anger but have always attempted to communicate in such a way that the person would feel that I have his best interests at heart and the hand of friendship is always extended.

Now I am sure there have been times in the midst of heated arguments that the person on the other end wasn’t feeling waves of love coming from me. This may be true, but that doesn’t mean the door is not open. I always attempt to communicate with the love of the soul in mind so if the contentious one opens the door a channel for the love of Christ, it will be available.

This reader is a good example of this. Some time ago he became very disillusioned with me and started arguing against every point I brought up. He went beyond this to attacking me on every level even participating in an anti Keys website.

Through all this I tried to leave the door open though I must admit that he challenged my patience at times. He seemed to disappear for a time and then came back on board. I noticed a change in him and treated his with as much friendship as I would anyone. When I saw his new tone was sincere I took him off moderation and he has been a solid member ever since. He still disagrees with me at times but he is much more respectful.

If you pay attention you can feel the vibration of the person with whom you are communicating. This reader’s vibration now is a lot more loving than it was when he was challenging my every word. He’s not perfect, as he admits, but he is making progress and that is the important thing.

Now one of the problems with us humans is that we tend to believe that we are sending the other guy all the love he deserves or that is possible and if he doesn’t feel love or acceptance from us then that is his problem. That may be somewhat true at times but usually part of the problem lies with the sender.

Here are points to consider if one wishes to make the other feel that he is coming from an aspect of love and has the best interests of the other at heart.

[1] Soul contact is more than an individual thing. It is true that an individual can obtain a degree of soul contact but the greatest endowments come from group effort. If one writes off his brother, he may be writing off greater union with his own soul and group soul.

[2] It is a human tendency to believe one is being as loving and friendly as possible or that the other person deserves. Forget about what the other person deserves or how good of job you are doing – instead listen through the soul to the other guy. Does he feel a loving and friendly vibration coming from you? If not why? Maybe you think you are sending all the love necessary or possible and you are really far from the mark. Do not write off what the other person is feeling – learn from it.

[3] Have patience and tolerance for the other guy’s faults and mistakes. People hate to be corrected and often see correction or criticism as an unloving thing to do. Only correct others when you think they will appreciate it or you are nudged by the soul to do so.

[4] Do not insult the other person or use any type of name-calling.

[5] Be slow to take offense, for often no offense is intended.

[6] Say positive things about the other guy whenever possible. This will help keep the door of loving communication available.

May we set our sights on the good of the group as a whole and do our part in making it a place where love can be found.

Question About Art

Question: R.I.P Thomas Kinkade a wonderful painter. Kinkade died on Fri. For some reason he is one of the most successful artists ever becoming a mufti-millionaire selling his paintings, yet at the same time is he one of the most criticized artists ever. I read nothing but negative comments about his artwork with the exception of a few nice comments.

Cn you explain why most people seem to dislike the beautiful paintings that Thomas did? Others may disagree.

JJ: I’m not a big follower of the art world but do appreciate talent when I see it. I’ve read neither the praise nor the criticism of his art but after looking at some samples I believe I can answer your question.

The quality of his art is very good and distinctive but it reflects conservative values like Norman Rockwell and the Left has a knee jerk reaction to conservative values these days. In their minds it has no value. They see nothing good in the traditional 1950s type of values and will attack anyone who has anything good to say or project of them.

On top of this many become critics of the various arts because of a feeling of superiority and will attack things of value just to illustrate their supposed higher powers of discrimination.

Art helps people to tune into the possibilities of the inner world and renew their spirits.

There never was a child so lovely but his mother was glad to get him asleep. – Ralph Waldo Emerson

April 16, 2012

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Memories After Death

May 9, 2026 Joseph Dewey

Memories After Death

Question: My grandmother died 5 years ago and was wondering if she still remembers me in the afterlife? Does one’s memory vary from area to area like the astral and mental plane?

JJ: DK makes an interesting statement about memory in the next world I haven’t read anywhere else. He says we take with us our three most important memories centered around significant life lessons. I believe, however, this applies to us after we have settled down in our designated afterlife and start preparing for the next. Before that we keep our memories until we have our life review and then some time after.

Of course, the higher you go in the various levels the more access you have. I would suppose that those in the higher mental and above can access whatever memories they want but these would be the least interested in doing so because they will be centered on the future rather than the past.

Our memories are not lost but stored in the akasha and can be accessed through the soul whenever it may be necessary. This can be done right here in the physical as well as the next world if Higher Will sees it as necessary or if the right process is followed.

If one goes to the religious heaven or devachan he will enter a dream world. Just as in a dream you have vague and sometimes inaccurate memories of your waking life even so there you will construct a dream like reality that is linked to this life but not fully connected.

Question: Why do some forms of death have to be so awful…imagine being burned to death or chocking to death? Imagine being torture or dying from drowning? Why must some forms of death be so unpleasant?

JJ: Two reasons. First, all painful experiences are great learning devices that make us strong people in the long run. Secondly, there are many things about creation and life that couldn’t materialize and evolve any other way than it has. Just like the universe could not exist without gravity we also need the duality of pain and pleasure to fully evolve.

Eventually we will master the dualities so such painful deaths and circumstances will become a thing of the past.

Microwave test – food for thought

The subject of health and microwaving came up.

One side of the microwave debate insists that its use should be avoided at all costs – that any use of it is dangerous. They claim it damages the DNA and alters the food so it is harmful.

I think the truth is somewhat in between.

The site gives an experiment where plants are grown with regular and microwaved water. Ashley then gives us this Snopes reference where another experiment yields no measurable difference.

This reminds me of a time I was talking to a natural health practitioner and she told me that you shouldn’t even heat up water in a microwave. Apparently, it changes the polarity of the molecules and makes it dead. She said that microwaved water is so lifeless that it cannot even sprout seeds.

Well, I don’t microwave much food because it just doesn’t taste as good and taste is an indicate of quality, but I do heat up coffee, tea and water in the microwave. I was suspicious so I put her words to the test.

I sorted out two batches of seeds to sprout. For the first batch I used regular water that hadn’t been microwaved and for the second batch I used water that had been liberally boiled in the microwave. I watered the two sets of seeds with the two waters until they reached maturity and couldn’t tell the difference between the two. The lady was definitely wrong about microwaved water not being able to sprout seeds.

As far as its effect on foods go, I would like to see more research carried out. My gut feeling is that microwaved food does have drawbacks and is not as good for you as regular cooking but is not as bad as some claim.

I personally use a microwave sparing such as warming liquids and warming food up if in a hurry. I never cook in a microwave.

Reader who has a small farm: And for anybody that wonders, we use ZERO chemicals of any kind on them and they eat only their natural food – weeds, leaves and grasses. We do give them free choice salt, minerals and baking soda.

JJ A lot of people do not realize that small farmers like yourself often take better care of animals than many people do their kids and their meat, eggs and milk is better quality than the government certified organic. If you want good meat products just search Craig’s list for a local guy with meat, eggs or milk for sale. Local whole foods markets also often sell products from local farmers.

The nice part about being a pessimist is that you are constantly being either proven right or pleasantly surprised. – George F. Will

March 16, 2012

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE