Category: Teachings

Index for More Recent Posts

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

For Free Book by JJ go HERE

The Real Atonement

July 22, 2026 Joseph Dewey

The Real Atonement

Thinker: So, what is your thinking on the atonement of Christ?

True Believer: I believe he died for my sins and through the shedding of his blood I am saved.

Thinker: And what have you done to be saved?

True Believer: I believe on Him and accept the gift he has given me.

Thinker: And what are you saved from?

True Believer: My sins.

Thinker: All your sins or part of them?

True Believer: All of them, of course.

Thinker: Are you saved now?

True Believer: Yes, I’m saved through the blood of Jesus.

Thinker: Does this mean that your past sins will be as if they never happened?

True Believer: Yes.

Thinker: Theft is a sin, is it not?

True Believer: Yes. The scripture says, “Thou shalt not steal.”

Thinker: Let us suppose that before you were saved you robbed a guy on the street of his money that was going to pay for an operation to save his daughter’s life. Without the money the kid dies but shortly thereafter you find Jesus and get saved. Is the kid still dead?

True Believer: Of course.

Thinker: So, even though you are now saved, your sin still has a terrible effect and the father hates your guts. Sounds like your sin still has an effect even though you accept Jesus.

True Believer: Well, I suppose our sins have a residual effect in this world, but when we accept the atonement we have a clean slate in God’s eyes for the next world.

Thinker: So, even though you are saved, your sins have an effect in this world but none in the next.

True Believer: Yes.

Thinker: Let us suppose that the sick girl was not saved when she died but was on the verge of it and would have found Jesus if she had lived. Because of your sin then she goes to hell instead of heaven. Does that sound like your sin will have no effect in the next world?

True Believer: There’s no way to tell if she would have been saved.

Thinker: We do know that a lot of kids do eventually accept Christ. That is a fact and in our example we are talking about one of these. Now, let us place ourselves in the kid’s position after death. There she is suffering in hell with the realization that she was going to turn her life around if she had lived, but this didn’t happen because of you. She curses your name even as you are enjoying bliss with Jesus. Does that sound like your sin has no effect in the next world?

True Believer: God will take away the memory of my sins so I will not be affected by anyone in hell.

Thinker: Where does it say that in the Bible?

True Believer: I’m not sure. It’s in there somewhere.

Thinker: Wrong. It’s not in there. And even if this strange idea were true it would be pretty cold hearted to ignore the eternal suffering of a child, by blotting out the memory, when that suffering was your fault. Don’t you agree?

True Believer: God’s ways are not man’s ways. If we could understand God then it would all make sense. We can’t use the reasoning of this world.

Thinker: But it sounds like you are using the reasoning from your mind in this world to make sense of the atonement. What makes you think that reasoning from your thinking in this world is correct?

True Believer: That’s what faith is all about.

Thinker: So your faith is based on the reasoning of this world?

True Believer: You’re twisting things. My faith is based on the Bible, the Word of God.

Thinker: And what makes you think you understand it since you have to use your worldly mind to read it?

True Believer: The Bible is clear. I just accept what it says.

Thinker: Let’s see if you accept this:

“But let every man prove his own work, and then shall he have rejoicing in himself alone, and not in another. For every man shall bear his own burden. Let him that is taught in the word communicate unto him that teacheth in all good things. Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” Gal 6:4-7

Would you read verse five for me?

True Believer: “For every man shall bear his own burden.”

Thinker: Does that sound like Jesus is going to negate the effects of our mistakes or sins?

True Believer: You’re taking things out of context.

Thinker: But the context continues in verse seven. Read that.

True Believer: “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.”

Thinker: So, even though you have found Jesus this does not negate the fact that you robbed a guy and caused his daughter to die and go to hell. What do you suppose this will cause you to reap?

True Believer: I will reap heaven because I am saved.

Thinker: Not so fast. Read Revelations 14:13

True Believer: “And I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Write, Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord from henceforth: Yea, saith the Spirit, that they may rest from their labours; and their works do follow them.”

Thinker: So, even though you now accept Jesus and are righteous what happens to your works?

True Believer: [He doesn’t want to answer.]

Thinker: Since you won’t say it, I will. It says “their works do follow them.” It is clear here that it is speaking of our works following us into the next world. Concerning our debts, Jesus said something interesting. He stated that those who are cast into prison “shalt by no means come out thence, till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing.” Matt 5:26

So let us sum these scriptures up. They tell us that we will bear our own burdens, that we reap what we have sown, that our works follow us to the next world, and finally we have to pay our debts to the “uttermost farthing.” That doesn’t sound like a simple belief in Jesus is going to instantly undue all the damage created by the robber who cost the girl her life, does it?

True Believer: But the scriptures clearly say we are saved by the blood of Jesus. How do you explain that?

Thinker: One of the problems with the scriptures is that those who prize them greatly often misinterpret them the most. A prime example, from the Christian viewpoint, is the ancient Jews belief in the Messiah. From diligently reading the scriptures they thought he was going to come as a conquering hero, destroy the wicked and restore the kingdom to Israel. Did that happen?

True Believer: No.

Thinker: Correct. They missed reality by miles. Jesus had no army, he said to love our enemies and his kingdom was not of this world. Yet you can’t blame them because when you read the Old Testament it does sound like they could have been right. Have you ever considered that you may also have wrong interpretations of the scriptures?

True Believer: No, because I interpret them just the way they are written.

Thinker: And so did the Jews who were looking for a conquering Messiah – and so do the hundreds of religions who disagree with you. They all think they are interpreting the scriptures just the way they read, but obviously they are not all correct. Would you agree?

True Believer: Some people just read things into them that are not there.

Thinker: Well, let us see what is there. Since you give much weight to the scriptures that tell us that we are saved from sin through the sacrifice of Christ let us examine those words. The word “sin” in the New Testament comes from the Greek word HAMARTANO which means “to miss the mark.” In other words, when the Greeks, 2000 years ago, shot at a target with an arrow and missed they “sinned” [HAMARTANO] or missed the target. Another way to phrase this would be to say that to sin is to make an error in their aim or judgment. Would you agree?

True Believer: I suppose.

Thinker: The word “saved” comes from SOZO which is “to save or deliver.” The similar word “salvation” comes from SOTERIA which is more correctly rendered “deliverance” or “rescue.” Therefore, when the prophets wrote of being saved from sin they were literally saying they were delivered from error. So what did Jesus do to save the people from error?

True Believer: I’m not sure what you are getting at,

Thinker: Let us look at the actual words of Jesus. He said to his disciples, “Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you.” John 15:3

Notice that this was spoken before his sacrifice of the cross. He didn’t speak of blood saving them from sin but something else. What was it?

True Believer: His word.

Thinker: Good. In other words, that which delivered the people from error was the words of Jesus. He also said, “It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.” John 6:63

So what did he say his words were?

True Believer: Spirit and life.

Thinker: Here’s another powerful scripture giving light on the words of Jesus: “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.” John 5:24

So, his word can lead to what?

True Believer: Everlasting life.

Speak the truth, but leave immediately after. – Slovenian proverb

July 11, 2013

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for More Recent Posts

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

For Free Book by JJ go HERE

The Root of Fear

July 14, 2026 Joseph Dewey

The Root of Fear

A reader asks: A lot of born again and regular Christians believe that through God they will never have fear again hardly….or rarely. JJ, have you ever been scared before since becoming an initiate at the current level you are at?

Can high disciples still get scared and why?

JJ: All lives will have fear at one time or another, even God. After all, we are in the image of God as well as one with God. Therefore, our fears are a part of the life of God.

DK wrote that “Fear has its roots in the warp and woof of matter itself.” Since the matter of the universe is the physical body of God this means that God Itself has fear woven in the fabric of his body.

Joseph Smith made this interesting statement; “What did Jesus do? Why I do the things I saw my Father do when worlds came rolling into existence. My Father worked out his kingdom with fear and trembling, and I must do the same; and when I get my kingdom, I shall present it to my Father, so that he may obtain kingdom upon kingdom, and it will exalt him in glory. He will then take a higher exaltation, and i will take his place, and thereby become exalted myself.” Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith; Pages 347-8

The apostle Paul said: “Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.” Phil 2:12

The main thing that causes fear is an approach to the unknown with the possibility of loss. If you are in a battle for your life there is a possibility of loss and the outcome is unknown.

When God created the universe he did not know of all the problems he would encounter and this fear became embedded in the fabric of the universe.

Reader: “Fear is fear because it is related to illusionary beliefs.

JJ: Where do you get the idea that fear is based on illusionary beliefs? Are we to accept this just because you or someone else says so?

Reader: “If it were not based on illusionary beliefs what would it be based on? Truth, true belief or true knowledge?”

JJ: I may be the first to tell you this but yes, fear is based on truth. Everything that happens is from a cause that is true- at least as long as we live in this reality. How one reacts to truth perceived determines the fear.

Let me give an example. Let us suppose that you are living a very positive life and the thought of any type of fear is the farthest thing from your mind as you are enjoying a ride in the country with your wife and kids. As you descend down a mountainous range, you feel quite secure for you have traveled it many times; but this time is different. This time your brakes go out. You press the pedal several times and nothing happens as you speed around corners barely managing to evade running off the edge, which would surely end the lives of you and your family. Because you have traveled this road many times, you know things will only get worse because the incline just increases. You make a calculation that tells you that the chances are very great that you and your family are going to be greatly injured or die.

This “truth” brings numerous fears to your mind.

As we said previously, fear always involves a loss of some type and the possible loss here is very real. The fears in this situation revolve around the following losses:

[1] Loss of your own life [2] Loss of your family’s lives. [3] Loss of opportunity for your kids to grow up and face the challenges of life. [4] Loss of an earthly relationship with your family.

Numerous other losses could be cited here, but the point is that all theses fears, revolving around loss, are based on a very probable truth.

Now even if a miracle happens, and you regain control, this does not mean your fear was based on illusion. At the time that you were descending without brakes, it was indeed true that you had a high probability of disaster. The only thing that averted it was the fact that your fear did not let you accept such a fate and you did all in your power to change the future.

Even a fear within a dream is based on some truth. I used to dream on a regular basis of this grotesque monster in various forms that chased me. It often pursued me for some time and sometimes caught me at some dead end and, as it approached me, I experienced great fear and usually woke up about that point.

Now one may object here and say “That was just a dream and not reality so your fear there was based on illusion.”

Not so my friend for it is indeed true that I was having a dream and that within the dream I was perceiving a monster and there was a real possibility of loss.

What were the possible losses involved?

[1] I was enjoying most of the dream and the monster threatened the loss of an enjoyable dream experience that I wanted to savor.

[2] Loss of sleep. I didn’t want to wake up and have to struggle getting back to sleep.

Then one night when I was having the dream something different happened. The monster had me cornered and there was no place to run. I was to either die within the dream, never a pleasant experience, or figure a way out. I looked up at the monster and he was ferocious indeed. He was about twenty feet tall and mean as hell and appeared ready to devour me in about three seconds.

As I contemplated, the thought of fighting back occurred to me for the first time. But I had difficulty in accepting it, for the monster looked a hundred times stronger than me. When I realized that I was faced with the choice of fighting or doing nothing, I decided to go out fighting and I attacked the monster. To my surprise I saw fear in the monsters eyes when I attacked. This gave me courage and I continued and when I pressed forward I discovered to my joy that I was much stronger than the monster. I then proceeded to give him a good beating and finally picked him up with super human strength and threw him off into oblivion.

Just as the monster caused a fear in the dream state, just as real as a fear in the awake state, even so did I feel a joy at overcoming the monster that was just as real as anything while awake. In fact I felt great for about three days after the dream.

The reason I talk here about truth within dreams, is that I’m sure you are going to tell us that life in these dualities is not real, therefore, all fear is based on perception within the dualities which are not real.

Whereas the real truth is that whether we be in the illusion of physical duality, or a dream state, it is indeed true that our consciousness is there and the perceptions we have there create a real experience. Even though the monster did not exist in this higher reality, the experience of the monster was real and this made the fear real.

If you lose your brakes going down a steep incline, it does little good to tell yourself, “this is not the true reality.” It is a true reality that you are in the experience and if you do not make the best of it you will suffer loss.

Listen to what a Master of Wisdom has to say about fear: “You ask: What are the basic causes of fear? To that question, if carried far enough back into the esoteric history of the solar system, there is no intelligible answer to be given. Only the advanced initiate can comprehend. Fear has its roots in the warp and woof of matter itself, and is par excellence, a formulation or effect of the mind principle, and a result of mental activity. The fact that birds and animals know fear puts the whole subject upon a wider footing than if it were simply a human failing and the result of the activity of the functioning of the human mind. It is not incident upon a man’s possessing a reasoning mind; if he used his reason in the correct way, he could eliminate fear. It lies in what is called “cosmic Evil”, a high sounding phrase conveying little. It is inherent in the fact of matter itself and in the play of the pairs of opposites-soul and matter.” A Treatise on White Magic, Pg 298

In harmony with this Joseph Smith made the interesting statement that “God created the worlds with fear and trembling.” This would explain why “fear has its roots in the warp and woof of matter itself.”

Now some have said that all fear is caused by a lack of love, but such is not the case. In the example of the fear generated by the failing brakes, the intensity of it was increased because of love for wife and children.

Fear is overcome through using the mind to calculate the best possible moves to eliminate the perceived future loss. For instance, in my dream I mentally calculated that the only possible way out was to fight and this eliminated the fear. I did not overcome the fear of the monster by loving it, but by defeating it.

It is true that many have fears are not justified because of wrong perception. For instance, one may fear that his spouse is cheating on him because of misperception or a wild imagination, but when he has attained correct use of the mind, then his perception will be accurate. When perception and calculation are accurate then fear will be based on the real as in the example of the loss of the brakes.

This portrayal of fear by many teachers of the day, as a thing held only by the deluded, the unloving, the unevolved or the ignorant, has led many into great illusion. Because many seekers have swallowed this pleasant sounding doctrine without processing it through the mind they enter into a world of deception and denial.

When a fear surfaces, instead of facing and defeating it, they generate a “fear of fear” and they will think something like this:

“This fear is not real so I cannot be experiencing it. Only the lesser evolved and the unloving have fear and since I am evolved and loving I cannot be experiencing it. Therefore, I deny this fear.”

Thus the seeker deceives himself rather than facing the fear and transcending it. That fear which is denied or suppressed does not go away. Instead it foments and grows and when it resurfaces it will loom greater than it was at the moment of burial.

The Now is the time to face and overcome and join in the company of the Great Ones.

Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage. – Robert Louis Stevenson

March 9, 2013

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for More Recent Posts

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

For Free Book by JJ go HERE

Interview with a Reptile

May 14, 2026 Joseph Dewey

Interview with a Reptile

A reader asked me to check out the Interview with a Reptilian. I finally got around to reading it and it was quite interesting.

Basically the article is about a claimed interview with a female member of the reptilian species who goes by the name of Lacerta. She claims the reptilian race never went extinct but have gone under the earth and many of them live in great caverns that house underground cities.

Lacerta says they have the power to mask their true form so when they appear among humans they are seen as regular humans. On the other hand, they cannot mask themselves from photos which will reveal their true form. Here is a description of the way they look when unmasked.

As I’m female I have also two breasts [despite our reptile origin, we have started to give milk to our babies during the evolution process – this happened around 30 million years ago – because this is the best thing to keep the young alive. Evolution had done this for your species already in the dinosaur age and a little bit later also for ours. That means not that we are now real mammals] but the breasts of us are not as large as those of human woman and the size of them is generally equal for every female of my kind. The external reproduction organs are for both sexes smaller then those of humans, but they are visible and they have the same function as yours [another gift of evolution to our species].

My skin is mainly of a green-beige color – more pale green – and we have some patterns of brown irregular dots [each dot of the size of 1-2 centimetres] on our skin and in our face [the patterns are different for both sexes but females have more, especially in the lower body and in the face]. You can see them in my case as two lines over the eyebrows crossing my forehead, at my cheek and at my chin.

My eyes are a little bit larger then human eyes [for this reason, we can see better in the darkness] and usually dominated from the large black pupils, which are surrounded from a small bright-green iris [males have a dark-green iris]. The pupil is slit and can change its size from a small black line to a wide-open egg-shaped oval, because our retina is very light sensitive and the pupil must compare this. We have external round ears but they are smaller and not so curved as yours, but we can hear better because our ears are more sensitive for sonic [we can also hear a wider range of sonic]. There’s a muscle or “lid” over the ears which can completely close them [for example under water].

Our nose is more pointed and there is a V-shaped curving between the nostrils, which enabled the ancestors to “see” temperature. We have lost most of this ability, but we can still feel temperature much better with this “organ”. Our lips are shaped like yours [those of females a little bit larger then those of males] but of a pale brown color and our teeth are very white and strong and a little bit longer and sharper then your soft mammal teeth. We have no different hair colors like you [but there is a tradition to color the hairs in different ages] and the original color is, like mine, a greenish brown. Our hairs are thicker and stronger then yours and they grow very slow. In addition, the head is the only part of our body where we have hairs.

Our body, arms and legs are similar in shape and size to yours, but the color is different [green-beige, like the face] and there are scale-like structures on the upper legs [over the knee] and upper arms [over the elbow]. Our five fingers are a little bit longer and thinner then human fingers and our skin on the palm is plain, so we have no lines like you but again a combination of a scale-like skin structure and of the brown dots [both sexes have the dots on the palm] and we have no fingerprints like you. If you touch my skin, you will feel that it is smoother then your hairy skin. There are small sharp horns on the upside of both middle fingers. The fingernails are grey and generally longer then yours. You see that my nails are not so long and round at the top. This is because I’m female. Males have sharp pointed nails with a length of sometimes 5 or 6 of your centimetres.

The following feature is very different from your body and part of our reptilian origin: if you touch the backside of my upper body you will feel a hard bony line through my clothing. This is not my spine but a very difficult shaped external plate-strucure of skin and tissue following exactly our spine from the head to the hip. There is an extremly high number of nerves and large blood vessels in this structure and in the plates [which are around two or three centimetres long and very touch sensitive, this is the reason why we have always problems to sit in chairs with a back like this chair.] The main task of these small plates [beside a role in our sexuality] is simply the regulation of our body temperature and if we sit in natural or artificial sunlight, these plates become more bloodfilled and the vessels become wider and the sun is able to heat up our reptilioid blood [which circulates through the body and through the plates] for many degrees and that gives us a great pleasure. Oh, we have no navel, because we were born in a different way to your mammal birth. [End Quote]

She gives an interesting take on the history of the planet I have not heard before. She says that 65 million years ago the dinosaurs were not killed by a meteor but by two species of aliens fighting over earth so they could mine its copper. One of them was humanoid and the other was reptilian. The war ended with the reptilian species detonating a fusion bomb that was more potent than expected and almost destroyed all life on earth.

I do not think this person interviewed a real reptile. Most likely it was a work of fiction. I do think that some of the things revealed in this treatise is true. For instance, I think it is correct that the earth is not hollow with a central sun but there are hollow parts. I think this is good material to read over and run by your soul for stimulation.

One thing did find irritating was the commentary by Michael & Stephanie Relfe. They kept telling me what to think of what Lacerta was saying and commented from a fundamentalist point of view.

You can read the full interview HERE

Some people get lost in thought because it’s such unfamiliar territory. – G. Behn

April 29, 2012

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

The Mystery of Melchizedek

April 18, 2026 Joseph Dewey

The Mystery of Melchizedek

Several times in the Bailey writings DK identifies Melchizedek with Sanat Kumara, the Lord of the World. Here is one:

“The Lord of the World, the Ancient of Days, Sanat Kumara, the planetary Logos, Melchizedek, He to Whom Christ referred when He said, ‘I and My Father are One.’” Externalization of the Hierarchy, Page 287

On the other hand, he indicated that the famous statement of oneness is not limited to a connection to one being but is more universal, for he also said this:

“The first Logos is electric fire, the fire of pure Spirit. Yet in manifestation He is the Son, for by union with matter (the mother) the Son is produced by Whom He is known. ‘I and my Father are One’ is the most occult statement in the Christian Bible, for it not only refers to the union of a man with his source, the monad, via the ego, but to the union of all life with its source, the will aspect, the first Logos.” TCF, Pages 150-151

He says quite a bit in this quote. First, he says that when in manifestation through matter the First Logos becomes the Son, or we could say the first ray of power manifests as love-wisdom.

Secondly, he says that the famous statement of union embraces more than a union with one being “for it not only refers to the union of a man with his source, the monad, via the ego, but to the union of all life with its source, the will aspect, the first Logos.”

What does this tell us? It tells us that Jesus and the overshadowing Christ saw themselves as, first of all, having a oneness to their source the monad, which is one with the universal God beyond all the hierarchies. Secondly there was a vision of oneness of not just the Christ, but “all life with its source.”

In other words, that which was realized by the Christ would eventually be achieved by all of us.

That Source he says is “the will aspect, the first Logos.” This would include Sanat Kumara, but not be limited to him, for this first aspect runs through all the Logoi in the universe.

Since DK links the name Melchizedek with Sanat Kumara it is natural to assume that the entity of that name in the Bible is the Lord of the World, but there is a major problem with this assumption which can be found in this statement:

“Sanat Kumara and His Pupils are in physical form, but have not taken dense physical bodies. They work on the vital etheric levels, and dwell in etheric bodies. Shamballa, where They dwell, exists in physical matter as do the Kumaras.” TCF Page 753

The type of bodies they have is revealed here:

“Shamballa will be one of the latest etheric sacred spots to be revealed as it exists in the matter of the second ether.” Initiation Human and Solar, Page 33

Thus Sanat Kumara dwells in Shamballa where all forms are composed of the second ether, which is normally invisible to human eyes, much more difficult to see than the fourth ether of Kirlian photography.

From the writings we have about Melchizedek it appears that he existed in a dense physical body. Consider this account from Genesis:

When Abraham learned that his nephew Lot had been kidnapped by four kings involved a conflict, he decided to rescue him and retrieve his stolen flocks and herds. He gathered 318 of his men and attacked them by night and made a daring rescue as well as retrieving his goods and some from his enemies. On his return he was greeted by a mysterious person. It is written:

“And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God. And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth: And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand. And he gave him tithes of all.” Genesis14:18-20

Outside of a brief mention in Psalms this is all the Old Testament has to say about him. However, Josephus, the Jewish historian, adds a couple more details. His name means “Righteous King” and says he was a Canaanite leader who founded Salem, which was later named Jerusalem. There he built the first temple and served there as the first priest.

Then in some of the Aramaic renderings of the Book of Genesis we have this added detail: “And Melchisedech, king of Jerusalem—he is Shem the Great—brought out bread and wine, for he was the priest who ministered in the high priesthood before the most High God.”

So here Melchizedek is identified as Shem, son of Noah, who according to Biblical chronology outlived Abraham by about 35 years.

According to these various Old Testament era accounts it sounds like the Melchizedek of Abraham’s era could not have been Sanat Kumara, Lord of the World for the following reasons.

He was said to be a priest of the most high, not the most high himself.

He was obliviously in a dense physical body even sharing food and wine with Abraham.

So where does the idea come from that he was a supernatural being such as the Lord of the World?

It seems to largely come from the Book of Hebrews of the New Testament. There we are told that Christ was “Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec.” Heb 5:10

Then it indicates that Melchizedek was greater than Abraham because Abraham paid tithes to him, a recognition of superior status. Then it makes a statement about him not found in the Old Testament that adds to his mystique as someone more than human:

He is: “Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually.” Heb 7:3

This was indeed a strange statement since the ancient records tell us he was born and died and had parents. How could the mortal Melchizedek of the time of Abraham also be an almost godlike and immortal figure as presented in the Book of Hebrews?

A hint is given in verse 15 where Jesus is said to be “after the similitude of Melchisedec.”

This takes on additional meaning when we look at the Gnostic Library of Nag Hammadi wherein we discover that many Gnostic Christians saw Christ and Melchizedek as the same being. In other words, Christ was Melchizedek in a previous life.

In saying this we must take into consideration the teachings from DK that there were two entities involved in the life of Christ. There was Jesus who was incarnated as the Son of Mary. DK says that in previous lives he was Joshua who was with Moses and Jeshua from the time of Ezra. Also, Yogananda tells us he was Elisha who made this unusual request from Elijah: “let a double portion of thy spirit be upon me.” II Kings 2:9 He then manifested that double portion as Jesus.

Then at the baptism we are told that an even higher entity who had the position of the Christ descended upon Jesus and dwelt with him for the next three years. DK tells us that his entity was the same as Krishna of Hindu fame.

Thus, this entity who DK says is the Christ was not born into the body of Jesus but functions with him and filled the description of Melchizedek being “Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God.” Heb 7:3

This indeed sounds as if it was Melchizedek who descended upon Jesus and assisted him. No wonder DK says that the words of Jesus “I and My Father are One” refer to Melchizedek as the Father. (See Externalization of the Hierarchy, Page 287)

All these details are enough to make a student’s head spin. How do we put all these pieces together so they all make sense? Actually, it is pretty simple. Everything makes sense when we consider this scenario:

The mortal Melchizedek from the days of Abraham, who had a mother and father, was an incarnation of the entity who currently holds the position of the Christ. Even Abraham recognized him as greater than himself.

Melchizedek then returned at the baptism of Jesus and entered into him and assisted him for three years.

But, the overshadowing of Jesus was not a one-time event as it has happened numerous times, including at the time of Melchizedek’s mortal life.

Sanat Kumara could not take off 600 years from his position as the head of the Council Chamber at Shamballa to incarnate as Melchizedek so, instead, he overshadowed him and assisted him from a distance. Melchizedek and Sanat Kumara were thus one just as Jesus and Christ/ Melchizedek were one.

This Sanat Kumara, who was without father and mother, assisted Melchizedek in the days of Abraham as well as in the days of Jesus.

This explanation is far from orthodox, but seeing it from this vision causes all the pieces to fall into place and make sense.

May true seekers contemplate and receive soul confirmation or themselves.

“And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them (the disciples); that they may be one, even as we are one.” Jesus, John 17:22

April 18, 2026

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Jesus Christ, And the Mystery Of His Name

April 11, 2026April 11, 2026 Joseph Dewey

Jesus Christ, And the Mystery Of His Name

TEACHER: It is important here that we clear up some of the darkness surrounding Jesus. The various sects today are purporting the idea that Jesus is the one and only Son of God. The Bible, on the other hand, shows Jesus as our wiser brother who came to show us an example and to teach us. A lot of the problem is caused through mistranslation. Let us read John 10:36: “Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said I am the Son of God?” Notice Jesus is quoted as saying he is “the” Son of God but in the Greek that it is translated from there is no ‘the’ and it is correctly translated as “a Son of God” or “Son of God am I.” Why do you suppose the translators mistranslate it even though they know better?

STUDENT: Because it goes along with what they believe.

TEACHER: It is surprising that they did not repeat the error with the word Saviour because most sects call him “the Saviour.” Let us read Luke 2:11: “For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.” When someone is called “the” something it generally means he is the only one, but when he is called “a” something it means he is one of many. Since Jesus was called a Son of God and a Saviour would this mean that there are other Sons of God and other Saviours besides him?

STUDENT: I suppose so.

TEACHER: We will prove it. Read Obediah verse 21: “And Saviours shall come up on mount Zion to judge the mount of Esau; and the kingdom shall be the Lord’s.” How do we know there will be more than one saviour here?

STUDENT: Because Saviours is plural.

TEACHER: There are numerous instances in the scriptures where we are called brethren to Jesus. [See: Matt 25:40; Heb 2:11 & Rom 8:29] If Jesus is our brother would we also not be sons of God?

STUDENT: I would think so.

TEACHER: There are many scriptures that teach this. We’ll just read one [Read Romans 8:14-17]: “For as many as are lead by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father. The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God. And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together.” How many of us are sons of God according to verse 14?

STUDENT: As many as are lead by the Spirit.

TEACHER: It says we will be joint-heirs with Christ. What does this mean?

STUDENT: It would mean that we will inherit the same benefits that he will.

TEACHER: Another false teaching is that the man Jesus created the heaven and earth. This is because Jesus is identified with the word of God in John [Read John 1:1-3]: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.” If Jesus was the Word it certainly sounds like he created everything, doesn’t it?

STUDENT: Yes.

TEACHER: There is an important word here that is mistranslated. In verse three which reads “All things were made by him” instead of “him” it should read “it.” Now read it over and tell me how that changes the meaning.

STUDENT: “It” would not refer to a person.

TEACHER: “It” here is the creative Spirit of God that not only flows through Jesus, but through all of us. Just as Jesus is not the only Word he is also not the only Christ. To understand what Christ is it would be helpful to read all of First Corinthians Chapter Twelve. We will just take time for verse 12 however: “For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.” Here Christ is not referred to as a person but what?

STUDENT: A body.

TEACHER: Does it say that the body has one member, or many members?

STUDENT: Many members.

TEACHER: Now read verse 27. It tells who the members of the body were: “Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular.” Who are the members that made up Christ?

STUDENT: The people Paul was writing to and probably us today also.

TEACHER: The man Jesus is not all of Christ there is but is merely the head [Colossians 1:18] of the body of Christ. Now another startling fact is that the Master from Galilee is only one of many that bears the name of Jesus Christ. The name actually signifies a calling and means “anointed to deliver, or save.” Jesus Christ is the Saviour of the world, but there are many who cooperate in that calling. The man Jesus is our head or leader, but the name is shared with infinite beings throughout the universe. Others who were called Christ or Messiah [which has the same meaning] are Saul [I Sam 24:10], David [Psalms 89:38], King Cyrus [Isaiah 45:1, Israel Psalms 105:14-15] and the High Priest [Leviticus 4:5]. The root of the word is used in connection with the early saints: [Read II Corinthians 1:21] “Now he which stablishesth us with you in Christ, and hath anointed us, is God.” The word “anointed” here comes from the same root as Christ does and could be translated as “Christed”. Now read it again translated this way.

STUDENT: Now he which stablishesth us with you in Christ, and hath Christed us, is God.

TEACHER: Were other people besides Jesus Christed then?

STUDENT: It appears so.

TEACHER: This name that we can share is a great mystery and a stumbling block to the religions throughout history. Let us read here where Paul is talking about Jesus Christ. [Read Ephesians 1:21]: {He is} “Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in the world to come.” The name of Jesus Christ is higher than any name not only in this world, but where else?

STUDENT: Also the world to come.

TEACHER: Now read Philippians 2:9: “Wherefore God hath highly exalted him [Jesus], and given him a name which is above every name.” The name of Jesus Christ is higher than how many names?

STUDENT: “Every name.”

TEACHER: Jesus often talked about his Father’s name. Let us read an interesting scripture about it. Read the first two lines of verses 6 & 26 in John Chapter 17. “I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me… And I have declared unto them [the disciples] thy name, and will declare it…” Here we are told that Jesus revealed to men the name of the Father. Do you remember any scripture where Jesus identified the name of the Father?

STUDENT: No.

TEACHER: The name of the Father was revealed many times. We have just missed it. We can read a hint in the last sentence of John 14:28: “My Father is greater than I.” Who was the greatest? Jesus or his Father?

STUDENT: The Father.

TEACHER: Therefore who should have the greatest name?

STUDENT: The Father

TEACHER: But who does the scriptures say has the highest name in this world or the world to come? [Refer back to Eph. 1:21 and Phil 2:9 [Scriptures 20&21] if necessary]

STUDENT: Jesus Christ

TEACHER: How could Jesus Christ have the highest name when the Father is greater?

STUDENT: I’m not sure.

TEACHER: We’ll read one more scripture to clarify this. Let us turn to John 10:25: Jesus answered them, I told you, and ye believed me not: the works that I do in my Father’s name, they bear witness of me. Whose name did Jesus do his works in?

STUDENT: The Father’s.

TEACHER: And what name was that?

STUDENT: The name of Jesus Christ.

TEACHER: This makes everything logical. If the name of Jesus Christ is the highest then and the Father is greater than the man Jesus, then the name of the Father would also have to be the highest name, wouldn’t it?

STUDENT: Yes.

TEACHER: Obviously, the Father would not have a lower name than the Son. On the other hand, do not sons carry the same name as their fathers?

STUDENT: Yes they do?

TEACHER: This is verified in Ephesians 3:14-15: “For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named.” Earlier we read that God’s sons are those who have his Spirit. Would you agree that the Father’s family are the Sons and Daughters of God, or those who are in tune with His Spirit?

STUDENT: Yes.

TEACHER: This scripture says that God’s family in heaven and on earth is named after who?

STUDENT: The Father.

TEACHER: And what name does he have?

STUDENT: Jesus Christ.

TEACHER: Do you remember what this name means?

STUDENT: Anointed to deliver or save.

TEACHER: The reason it is the highest name is because there is no greater calling in the universe than to be anointed to deliver or save others from a lower estate or plane of consciousness and bring them up higher. Can you think of a greater work than helping someone else in their progression?

STUDENT: No.

TEACHER: As final evidence of this let us read the final words of Jesus to his disciples: [Read Matthew 28:19] “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.” Look at the word “name” here and tell me if it is singular or plural.

STUDENT: It is singular.

TEACHER: Now if the Father, Son and Holy Ghost had three names it would read “the names of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost,” but because it is singular, how many names would he be referring to?

STUDENT: One name.

TEACHER: Peter clearly tells us what name that was [Read Acts 2:38]: “Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.” So what was the name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost that they were commanded by Jesus to be baptized in?

STUDENT: The name of Jesus Christ.

TEACHER: The next thing we need to learn is how to take upon ourselves the name of Jesus Christ. An ordinance was instituted to help us accomplish this. Do you know what it was?

STUDENT: Was it baptism?

TEACHER: Let us read the effect of baptism: [Read Galatians 3:27]: “For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.” What is supposed to happen through baptism?

STUDENT: We put on Christ.

TEACHER: Do you suppose that means that we take his name upon us as well as his nature?

STUDENT: It could.

TEACHER: Not only do we take his name upon us but we also are to bear his image. [Read Romans 8:29]: “For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son [Christ], that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.” Whose image are we supposed to bear?

STUDENT: The Christ or the Son of God.

TEACHER: How do we know from this scripture that Jesus will not be the only Christ, or the last one born?

STUDENT: Because it calls him the firstborn among many brethren. Therefore, there are going to be many more like him.

TEACHER: In addition we are supposed to have another part of Christ in us. Read here in Philippians: [Phil 2:5-6] “Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God.” What is supposed to be in us?

STUDENT: The same mind that was in Jesus.

TEACHER: Now let us read about what we are supposed to be like when the Master appears: [Read I John 3:2] “Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.” What are we to be like when he appears?

STUDENT: Like him.

TEACHER: And why is that?

STUDENT: Because we shall see him as he is.

TEACHER: And what is he?

STUDENT: Our brother. He was the firstborn of many brethren?

If you make people think they’re thinking, they’ll love you. If you really make them think, they’ll hate you. – Don Marquis

Nov 13, 2011

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

The Path of Truth

December 29, 2025 Joseph Dewey

The Path of Truth

I never thought I would have to defend the idea that telling the truth is a good thing and lying is not so good, but after reading the post by Christopher Nemelka on March 29, 2011 I feel for the first time in my life that I need to write on this very subject.

Every teacher I have encountered in the past, good or evil, in the light or dark, mean spirited or kind has presented themselves as truth tellers – even champions of it. Few will admit to lying about anything and if caught will at least defend themselves as trying to present truth. Even Satanists claim to be presenting the truth.

Chris is not only politically (or spiritually) incorrect (which attitude I often admire) but he takes his contrary view to a new dimension when he makes statements like:

He is teaching “under the mandate of the lying God.”

“BY GOD … literally … WE ARE COMMANDED TO LIE!” (caps in original)

“IF I DID (tell the real truth) I WOULD BE LUCIFER’S MESSENGER, NOT GOD’S.”

These statements ought to get any readers attention. If nothing else, these quotes alone show that Nemelka has an unusual approach. Now let us examine his post in more detail.

According to him he always told the truth to the best of his ability until June 16, 1987. From that date forward much of his thinking was reversed.

He says:

“Once I gained a proper perspective of real truth, I was filled with consternation that ‘lying’ was part of the plan for mortality, and that the very first person to lie, was not Eve, it wasn’t even Lucifer, IT WAS ELOHIM!”

“That’s right! Elohim, the God of all Gods.”

To back up his case he reviews the account of the fall of Adam and Eve. Here are pertinent quotes from the Bible about it:

Genesis2:16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:

Genesis2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

Genesis3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

Genesis3:2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:

Genesis3:3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

Genesis3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: 3:5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

Genesis3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.

Genesis3:7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

To this scripture Nemelka says that God lied and Lucifer told the truth, but was this the case?

Actually, Nemelka is far from being the first to make this accusation. It has been made many times by atheists as well as a number of spiritual teachers including Madame Blavatsky.

The problem is that because of the imperfection of words both interpretations can be supported, but few if any outside of Nemelka see lying as a good thing. The side where truth lies should be where we place our allegiance.

Now some, like Nemelka say that God lied when he told Adam this: “In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” Adam lived over 900 years after he ate the fruit so he didn’t die in the day he ate the fruit – so they claim.

Do they have a point?

Not really. For one thing do you really think Hebrew scribes would let something stand for thousands of years that presents God as a liar? Of course not. Followers are not perfect and they will protect their own and change the text if necessary to protect their God from such an accusation.

So why then does the text read as it does where it is as ambiguous as it is?

The reason is that we are not reading the Hebrew, but an orthodox English translation which often distorts the Hebrew meaning. To get as close as possible to the original meaning we must look at the Hebrew.

First, let us look at the English translation again.

“But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” Gen 2:17

The first word to note is “day” which comes from the Hebrew word YOWM. This doesn’t necessarily mean a 24-hour day but can also be translated as “time” implying an unspecified period of time.

A key to understanding lies in the phrase “shalt surely die.” This is composed of a repetition of the same Hebrew word for “die,” which is MUWTH. So the verse reads “for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely (muwth) die (muwth)”

Thou shalt die, die doesn’t make a lot of sense so what is the explanation? The two words are slightly different in the Hebrew. The first die (muwth) is in the infinitive tense and the second in the imperfect.

The repetition of the two words in the two tenses is interpreted by scholars to mean emphasis so most translations render it as, “surely die,” or “certainly die.”

If we translated it literally it would read, “for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt be dying and die,” or “dying you shall die.” The Concordant Bible’s literal translation is, “for in the day you eat from it, to die shall you be dying.” Young gives the translation as “dying thou dost die.”

The repetition of the word “die” does tell us that God was making a very definite and sure statement that Adam was going to experience the process of dying if he partook of the fruit.

There could be another interesting reason for the repetition of the word “die.” This could be symbolic of two kinds of death. After all, death does not mean that we no longer exist, but death is a separation of some kind. With physical death we are separated from our bodies but there is a second death called a spiritual death where we become separated from God. The day (or time) that Adam and Eve partook of the fruit they suffered a spiritual death and were separated from the direct presence of God. Also beginning on that day or time they started the process of dying which ended in physical death.

The trouble with words is that they rarely communicate the whole thought of the sender.

Suppose I tell my kid, “If you start eating lots of candy bars then you’ll get cavities.”

Even though this is a true statement a young kid is only left with a partial understanding. He may assume that he will get cavities the next day for the communication did not reveal anything about the time factor.

Even so Adam and Eve didn’t know if they would die immediately or after a period of time. They probably didn’t know they would suffer from two different kinds of dying.

Then after receiving the commandment Satan comes along and tells Eve;

“Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” Genesis3:4-5

Here Nemelka claims that Satan was telling the truth whereas God was lying. But was Satan telling the truth?

Notice that Satan did not say, “You shall not die TODAY,” but just a flat, “You shall not die.”

Now after they partook of the fruit it may have seemed like Satan told the truth for they were still alive even after their bodies changed from an immortal to a mortal state. But, after 930 years Adam did finally die, so Satan’s proclamation that they would not die was a lie and deceptive.

Satan’s next statement had truth and error in it for he said: “then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.”

This statement was true in that they learned about good and evil but it was not true in that they would be like the gods and not die.

Our imperfect minds could be mislead by either God or Satan, but God told the literal truth and Satan’s words were literally not true.

When those on the side of the light speak their words are true, but they rarely reveal all the details.

“It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.” Proverbs 25:2

To conceal a thing is not a lie. A lie consists of words spoken or written that are intentionally not true. All of us think many thoughts we do not vocalize and we are not lying when we do not speak them all.

Jesus verified that Satan lied for he said this to the Jews who were about to stone him:

“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.” John 8:44-45

Jesus acknowledged flat out that Satan murdered and lied in the beginning and he presented himself as one who tells the truth. He even said:

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” John 8:32

How often did Jesus say, “Verily, I say unto you…” Verily can be more literally translated as “truly,” or “of a truth I say unto you.”

The side of light and love always places great emphasis on telling the truth for often it was written that Jesus was “full of grace and truth.” John 1:14

God himself is referred to as a “God of truth.”

“Into thine hand I commit my spirit: thou hast redeemed me, O LORD God of truth.” Psalms31:5

“That he who blesseth himself in the earth shall bless himself in the God of truth;” Isa 65:16

“He is the Rock, his work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he.” Deut32:4

“And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth.” I John 5:6

We could talk indefinitely from the scriptures about God being on the side of truth. The only way to come to any other conclusion is to discard them completely. If Nemelka’s followers discard them completely then their only outside source of spiritual truth will be him.

That said, let us look at a few more of Nemelka’s comments.

He tells us:

“…our entire mortal existence is one big, divinely perpetuated lie, orchestrated by our Creators.”

He is using the word “lie” incorrectly here. “Illusion” is the correct word. We do not say a magician is lying when he demonstrates illusion. Illusion and truth are both here to give us experience.

Then he says, “Mortal human beings are all consummate liars.”

This may be his experience but not mine. Most of my friends are consummate truth tellers.

He believes we lie if we do not tell an unattractive person they are ugly or express a controversial, opinion.

He doesn’t seem to realize that it is not a lie to not reveal all your thoughts. The important thing is that all the words you speak are true to the best of your knowledge. This is the code I live by.

Then he says:

“I realized that lying was much better for the human race than telling the real truth.”

This is perhaps the most elusive belief I have seen a supposed spiritual teacher advance.

Nemelka claims to have translated the Sealed Portion of the Book of Mormon and presented it as truth. Now he says this about his work:

“And then I was instructed to introduce another set of scripture to lie about a lie, which countered another lie that we had invented to try to get us to stop lying to each other.”

So, he says the Sealed Portion was a lie about a lie (The Book of Mormon) which countered another lie (the Bible).

Then Nemelka makes this fantastic statement:

“I have publicly admitted that I have lied, deceived, and manipulated. But I have done so …

“IS THE WORLD READY TO HEAR THIS?

“… under the mandate of the lying God who placed us here on this godforsaken planet in the first place!”

There is a huge problem with the idea that God is full of lies toward us.

If God lies then we cannot depend on His word or the word of messengers on his side.

If we cannot depend on God’s word then we cannot trust God.

If we cannot trust God then we can have no faith.

Without faith there is no hope.

Without faith and hope there is no love.

Without faith, hope and love, there is only despair.

Is the plan behind the Father of lights one of despair?

No. A thousand times no. It is one of love leading to hope and peace and empowerment.

Nemelka ends with this confession:

“I’ve never liked what I have been doing, and I never will. I would rather work for Lucifer.”

I’d feel the same way if I thought God wanted me to spread lies.

On the other hand, I concentrate on telling the truth and giving out the highest truth I can understand. I love doing this because truth and love go hand in hand.

I suggest to Nemelka that he flee from any God, angel or messenger whose message is based on lies and concentrate on the truth. If he does this his zest for a living work will be joyful.

Truth exists, only falsehood has to be invented. – Georges Braque

April 1, 2011

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Christmas Message, 2025

December 25, 2025 Joseph Dewey

This entry is part 30 of 30 in the series Christmas Messages

Christmas Message, 2025

Master souls sat around the great table. In its center was a suspended globe representing the earth. They have the ability to gaze upon it and see the state of the planet, a nation, a city or even a single individual. For an extended time, they all looked upon it and focused with deep contemplation

After a period of deep silence, one withdrew and looked toward the Master, who is called the Christ, and spoke.

“The division and the hate are even greater than last year. How low is the point to which humanity will descend, and when will goodwill begin to prevail?”

The Master replied: “Pockets of humanity have been in this situation before, but now we have a division that is affecting the whole world. Do not despair, for differences must be seen before a true healing can occur, and this time the healing will not be just of a community, or a nation, but the world itself.

Another spoke, “But people are getting impatient and frustrated. How long before things turn around?”

“The lowest point is nearly reached,” replied the Master, “but as it is being approached people of goodwill are a force that are applying the brakes on the descent. The depth of the division is greater than last year, but the speed of the descent has been reduced. This means that humanity is approaching a great transition. Take a look at the planet as a whole.”

The group placed their attention on the entire planet and the humans upon it.

“Behold the pockets of dark and light,” He said. Much of the dark are like black holes that resist all light, but then we see points light emerging, some with potential to be suns to dispel the darkness and radiate love and goodwill. Look and see the changes over the decades and take hope.”

The group looked upon the earth and areas and points of dark and light appeared as they were forty years ago. Then they saw the changes occur as the years passed one by one, bringing them up to the present.

“Very interesting,” came a reply. “Over the years the dark became darker and the lights became brighter.”

“Yes,” replied the Master. “Many are depressed because they focus on the dark, but the hope of humanity lies in the lights of the earth. A light once seen instantly dispels darkness, but darkness cannot extinguish light. All the dark ones can do is direct humanity’s attention away from the light, but their power to do this is diminishing.”

Another spoke “Would you say then that the great transition of the ages is drawing near?”

“It is only a matter of time,” replied the Master. “The free will of the human race can speed up or delay the event, but the cycle is set and the transition is sure. Look and see the future of the planet when peace and goodwill prevail on the earth.”

They looked again and saw many changes. They saw the development of technology that would end poverty on the planet. They saw that many resisted the changes and others sought to control them for selfish ends, but in the end light and goodwill prevailed.

They saw homes being built and goods manufactured without the aid of human hands and being offered to all without payment of money. They saw the waters of the oceans diverted and purified to make the deserts blossom as the rose as predicted by Isaiah, creating a great increase in food production putting an end to hunger.

They saw cities being built in the desserts, on the oceans and in space, and even some floating in the air.

Efforts on enforcing borders were relaxed because people had freedom and abundance wherever they were and most had no need to escape to a better life.

Because needs were met they saw a great reduction in crime and a desire to learn from the messengers of light. Finally, they saw the Christ, the Master of Masters, walk the earth again and teach humanity to search within beyond that which technology can deliver. They saw humanity learning spiritual technology of which material technology was only a foreshadowing of that which was offered by the Christ and the Masters of Wisdom.

The Master spoke again: “Let light and love and power restore the plan on earth.”

All bowed their heads in silent reverence ending with – “Let it be so.”

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE