Month: January 2025

Chapter Forty-Three
Molecular Politics, Part I

One point most of us agree on is this. The legislators in the United States and all other free countries do not represent the will of the people to the satisfaction of the people. The majority of common people everywhere seem to feel somewhat betrayed by those who are expected to represent their interests. We find that instead of representing the interests of the people they either represent their own interests, the interests of party leaders or some other entity.

This seems to be a problem that we have all accepted as a necessary evil, but the true spiritual teachers and dreamers of the race do not accept flaws such as this as a permanent thing. Such people will say along with the late Robert F. Kennedy: “Some people see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask, why not?”

Instead of just accepting the necessary evils of our society and wondering why they have to be, let us elevate our minds to a higher level and dream of things better and ask: Why not?

Why not have a political system where the people are truly represented to the extent that they are satisfied that one voice is as important as another? Just because this is not the case now does not mean that the lights of the world cannot make creative change and make the dreams of the ages come true.

Even though many feel in their hearts and minds that a true democracy would be a wonderful thing there are many intelligent people who oppose it on an intellectual and philosophical basis, but I wish here to show that this basis is founded in illusion.

In the United States (and many other nations) pure democracy is opposed for two main reasons:

[1] It is not constitutional. We have a Republic that calls for a representative government where a one person is elected to cast a vote for the many.

[2] The polls that are continuously taken now illustrate that average John Q. Public is ill informed and that the majority will often support silly, immoral or dangerous notions. Even Hitler ran around 70% in the polls in his heyday.

Objection One: A true Democracy can function within the framework of our existing Constitution. Nothing has to be altered in the original document as we will illustrate in this treatise. We will clarify this as we proceed.

Objection Two: As we read about the various polls taken past and present it does seem at times that John Q. Average is misinformed, sometimes even a little unbalanced and certainly not one to whom we wish to trust the destiny of the nation. If the polls are any indication of how a true democracy would vote then it does seem wise to be against it.

Let us dispel this illusion by one statement of fact: A true democracy is not a poll and the results of the will of the people expressed in it will be much more logical and beneficial for the whole than a rule-by-poll would be.

Why is this?

Because the method of obtaining the vote is very different between the two.

There are three differences.

[1] In a democracy all who desire to vote are represented whereas in a poll only a very small percentage voice their opinion.

[2] In a true democracy people vote out of their own initiative because they know and feel something about the issue, but in a poll they use no initiative, but are contacted by a pollster. Many of those contacted through a poll would not be informed enough to even have a desire to vote in a democracy. Let us point out that in a true democracy the citizen is not forced to vote, but all who desire have the privilege of voting. This means that those who are ill informed and do not care about government will usually not vote. Thus in a democracy you will have a much more intelligent voting populace than you have in many polls.

This truth is illustrated by comparing polls taken on the internet verses polls taken by telephone. Internet polls that are equally accessible to the left and right are much more representative of how the results of a democratic vote would be than a telephone poll because those who respond are using their initiative to make the contact and are involved enough to be concerned about the issue.

As you compare similar issues responded to by regular polls and internet polls you will notice a huge difference in the direction of common sense for the internet polls. For instance, in the OJ trial regular polls had the public fairly evenly divided on his guilt or innocence, but in the internet polls people overwhelmingly thought he was guilty from the beginning. The latter obviously reflected the majority view which still exists.

It is interesting to note that polls have gotten less reliable over the years rather than more. I remember way back to the campaign of Nixon and Kennedy that the polls had then both in a dead heat. It was so close that few dared guess who the winner would be. The interesting thing here is that is just what happened. It was one of the closest elections in history just as the polls predicted.

Now in recent national elections the pollsters have been far less accurate than those way back in the Sixties. A prime example is from the 2024 presidential election where celebrated pollster Ann Selzer had Harris leading Trump in the swing state of Ohio 47% to 43%.  The actual results turned out that Trump won Iowa by 13 points, 56% to 43%.

Other pollsters in recent years have off about 10% nationally and with various states . That’s an error level about twenty times as high as the polls were back in 1960 when technology was nowhere near what it is today.

Why the big difference between polls and actual results?

The answer is that in its infancy the polls were used in a fairly logical and sincere effect to find the truth whatever that may be. Then one day it occurred to the powers that be that people were influenced by the polls. No one likes to look stupid and if it appears that everyone thinks XYZ is true then one may as well go along with the idea, especially if he is not sure his or her opinion is right to begin with.

Thus began the “everybody-thinks-this-way-and-so-should-you” polling concept. This new direction in polling does not reveal the true minds of the thinking public, but instead is a tool for influencing public opinion.

The power of influence on the non-thinking public of the “everybody-thinks-this-way-and-so-should-you” concept is very powerful and very much full of illusion. Remember the Milgram experiment? The subjects were willing to fry a man’s brains out because of the demand of an authority and also the implanting of the idea that other subjects were doing the same thing. These poor dupes were willing to risk the electric chair just to fit in. This illustrates how powerful the “fitting in” principle is and why the polls can become a dangerous weapon against real democracy or any representative system.

In the Sixties the polls were generally worded to find the truth, whatever that may be. Now, in this  generation, the polls are carefully worded so predetermined results will be obtained. In addition to this many polls use a carefully selected group of people whose opinion is already established.

Let us create an example of how a poll may be used to promote illusion; the topic of education provides a good example. This is a vulnerable one for the masses, as everyone wants to do all they can to ensure that our kids get the best in education, even if it calls for a sacrifice.

Imagine that a group of Congresspeople want to pass a big spending bill for Boondoggle Project #473 and they fear the public would be enraged at such a waste. Therefore, they decide to attach the spending for this project as a rider attached to an education bill because everyone loves and supports education. They therefore whip up a billion dollar education bill that sounds good, but is, in reality, a complete waste of money.

It turns out that over half the money in the bill goes to pet projects of those who created it, often crazy things that the voters would never approve in isolation. Then the money that does go toward education supports the creation of more administrators and more cushy benefits to current leaders. Maybe a couple percent of the funds go to benefit the teachers and the kids. The administrators are looking forward to using the extra money for educational “seminars” in Hawaii and the Bahamas.

Then begins the presentation and promotion. Congressional members who favor the bill present it as an education bill, money for “our kids,” “our future,” money that will help us catch up to other enlightened nations. Immediately all educational leaders join in support of the bill because they (mostly administrators, not the teachers) will greatly benefit. They immediately start repeating the mantra that this bill is “for the children,” and do their best to make anyone who opposes it as appearing to “hate kids.”

A handful of honest legislators actually read through the bill, see through the illusion and realize that it is a complete waste of money. As soon as their views are announced they are pounced on by supporters of the bill as being “against education.” They are also accused of “hating the kids.”

Shortly after these mantras are circulated a poll is commissioned by the supporters of the bill. Here are the questions:

[1] Do you support the XYZ education bill which will give more money to our schools so they can raise the educational level of our kids?

[2] Do you approve Congressmen Smith and Jones who are against the bill?

Now when the uninformed are called and hear these questions they think within themselves, “sure I’m for education. Let’s spend the money.”

Then in response to the second question they automatically think that Smith and Jones must be about as low as you can get for being “against the kids.”

Next the results of the poll (which is overwhelmingly for the bill and against Smith and Jones) is given to the media. Then the media without questioning or research announces the results and pretty soon the majority of the people are overwhelmingly in favor of the bill and see Smith and Jones and public enemies.

Now Smith and Jones who are the only ones in public favor of the truth are totally on the defensive and every time they are interviewed by the media, they are approached in an attack dog method and find that they spend all their time in defense rather than explaining their position. Finally, Smith and Jones withdraw into the woodwork thinking that if they keep quiet they can at least preserve what little image they have left.

Finally, the actual vote takes place and the two pork spending bills pass the house and goes to a Senate and President that does not dare reject it. Then when the next election comes around those who voted against the bill are attacked as being anti education.

Now this is a fictional account, but it represents a political process that is repeated over and over again and supported by an uninformed public. It illustrates to us the great present-day problem with the polls as well as the political process, but such problems will not be perpetuated by a true democracy. Instead, the problem will be cured.

In the democracy proposed here the voters will be more informed and the illusion caused by the polls will be dispelled.

Question: Why would a true democracy create more intelligent government than the current system? Isn’t an elected representative more intelligent and informed than John Q. Average?

 

Molecular Politics Part II
Negating the Will of the People

In all countries where there are free elections you have political parties that represent the conservative side on one hand and the liberal side on the other. In this treatise we shall mainly deal with politics as they exist in the United States, but the principles under discussion should apply to all free countries for they all have an interplay between the pairs of opposites.

Some countries have numerous parties representing the two sides, but in the United States over 90% of the population is generally represented by the two major parties – the Republican and Democratic parties.

Both parties claim to represent the “people,” but in reality each party represents the view of fewer than 50 per cent of the voters because of third parties and independent people.

Therefore, if you are a Democrat and are in a district where a Republican is elected you have to bite your tongue until the next election or longer. Then if a Democrat is elected at that time the Republican has to wander in the limbo of not being represented.

The point is that no matter who is elected only a minority is represented and the rest of the people are very disgruntled that their view is completely bypassed until their side wins again. Wouldn’t people be much happier if their views have a chance of being represented at all times?

This may seem like a pipe dream, but through the principle of Molecular Politics this becomes possible.

But before we get to the solution let us make sure we understand the complete problem. In addition to the frustration of not getting our party of choice in office half the time, voters also suffer considerable frustration when their candidate of choice seems to wander off the expected course and votes on numerous occasions contrary to even the will of his supporters.

There are seven strong influences on politicians that cause them to ignore the will of the people whom they claim to represent.

[1] Polls. We have already illustrated how polls are manipulated to appear as if they represent the will of the people when sometimes they do not. If the politician votes according to the polls his real voters will often be frustrated.

[2] Political groups, action committees and all those with a political agenda who contribute a significant amount of money or influence to help the candidate get elected. When this occurs candidates incur the well-known political debt that they must repay while in office or incur the wrath of those who put them there. If they refuse to vote in a way that pleases these powerful ones then they will work against the rebellious candidates in the next election.

Is the will of the people represented when the politician votes the will of the few powerful ones who provided financing?

No. Of course not.

[3] The third obstacle that interferes with the will of the people are special interest groups and large corporations who spend many millions in lobbying politicians so they will vote and legislate according to their will.

These lobbyists will visit targeted legislators on as regular basis as possible and lay their cause and wishes before them. They will also throw parties, wine and dine, and arrange field trips in the Bahamas and other exotic locations so the legislators can become better informed of certain problems. They also help to arrange for fund raising contacts to help assure reelection.

Now let us say it is time to vote for project X. The majority of the people are against it and a few have written letters about it, but they have not captured the Congressperson’s attention nearly as much as the constant influence and “assistance” of the lobbyist. When it comes time to vote, they vote “yes” because the pressure, the gifts, the parties, the free vacation are very fresh in their minds.

Let us ask this. When politicians vote the will of special interest groups are they truly representing the will of the majority of the people they claim to represent? In many cases the answer is a resounding “no!”

[4] Another common way that the people are not represented is through the trading of votes.

How does this happen? Here is an example: Let us say, for instance, that the Senator from Arkansas wants a grant for research into chicken feathers and the Senator from Idaho wants money for research into the control of the rabbit population. Now neither of these projects have enough support to pass, but each one of these guys would be a big hero in their home states if they could bring home the big bucks. So here’s what they do. The Senator from Idaho approaches the senator from Arkansas and says. I don’t really care about your feather research project in Arkansas, but I desperately need to get my rabbit project passed so I’ll tell you what. You vote for my project and I’ll vote for yours.

The Arkansas Senator jumps at this and agrees, and so they make a trade or agreement and support each other’s projects even though neither the Senators nor most of their constituents could give a rat’s behind about it.

So when the Senator from Idaho votes for the feather project in Arkansas, is the will of the people being truly represented?

We often hear of strange projects that our Congress spends millions of dollars on, like the study of the sex life of a mosquito, and we wonder who was crazy enough to have voted for such a thing. This trading of votes is part of the answer and is also one of the reasons Congress always manages to spend more money than they should.

[5] Another problem interfering with representation is ignorance. You have probably heard about pieces of legislation that are accompanied by something like 1,500 pages of research. Do you think our legislators take the time to read the whole thing? Very rarely. The real truth is that they often do not even read one page of material that is related to a bill they are voting on. Quite often all they know about the bill is what they have heard tossed around in debate or what their party bosses have told them.

Many bills have riders attached to them that will have more teeth than the bill itself. Often times the politician will know only a small amount about the bill and little or nothing about the riders, unless the rider happens to be a pay raise congressional members.

Therefore, we ask, when legislators vote for something they know little or nothing about can they in any way truly represent the will of the people who voted for them? Again, the answer is no.

[6] Influence from party leaders is another big item. We have seen time and time again that close to 100% of legislators vote along party lines on major items because of pressure from their leaders and the group itself.

From the time we were teenagers most of us have had some desire to fit in with a group and conform. This influence carries over in many ways to adulthood and is strongly manifest when our guy goes to Washington. We have seen time and time again that a person with high goals and good intentions goes off to Washington only to wind up under the thumb of party leaders and Washington influence.

When your representatives in Washington vote according to the wishes of party leaders are they then representing the will of the folks back home? Again the answer is obvious.

[7] The final barrier to real representation is prejudice. Elected officials have certain preconceived notions and religious convictions that are not the same as us folks who voted for them.

If they believe that the earth is only 7,000 years old because of religious conviction will this not affect their votes on education which teaches evolution?

If their religious convictions makes them strongly for or against abortion we know that there is nothing in the world including the will of the people, that will alter their vote.

If representatives use pot then they will generally support the legalization of it.

If they have lots of children they will favor tax breaks for families and so on.

Each legislator brings numerous prejudices to voting that have nothing to do with the will of the people.

So when we view all seven of these obstacles to the will of the people we may feel overwhelmed and feel within ourselves that we should just give up trying to change anything and just hope for the best.

The truth is that we do not have to give up on the possibility that the will of the people can become truly manifest. Such a thing is not only possible, but it is the destiny of the age to come.

There is a solution to these seven obstacles and they can be eliminated in one master stroke which is in complete harmony with the Constitution of the United States and most other free countries. Instead of just complaining about political situations, in our next article we will present a practical solution that will revolutionize the political world and eventually become a subject of great debate.

 

Molecular Politics Part III
A New System

In part II we talked about seven barriers that prevent our representatives from truly representing the people. In a word they are (1) Manipulated polls (2) Political action groups (3) Lobbyists (4) Trading votes (5) Ignorance (6) Pressure from party leaders and (7) Prejudice.

For many years these problems have seemed insurmountable to critics of the system. These problems with government just seem to be something that we have to put up with. Not only can you not fight city hall it seems that you cannot change it.

Actually, the only way to fight city hall (or Washington) IS to change it. Most people just throw their hands up in the air and believe that change is impossible, but change is not only possible it is inevitable. Sometimes change comes quickly and sometimes slowly, sometimes for the better and sometimes for the worse, but it does always come and nothing can stand in its way.

We are reaching a point of tension in the free governments of the world. Almost without exception governments which are supposed to be the servants of the people are becoming larger, more distant and more encroaching on the lives of the decent hard-working people. Spending always seems to go up which is generally followed by taxes going up. As more and more people get hooked on government benefits, greed and laziness sets in and these citizens who think they deserve more than those not getting benefits begin to demand more and more for themselves.

The drift toward more intrusive government in the lives of the common person can only go so far before change will come. The change will be one of two directions: (1) Governments will become all powerful thus preventing people from complaining about them or (2) the people themselves will institute change so power is given back to them where it belongs.

This treatise and others I will write is to ensure that the good change comes rather than the evil. We must change our belief system from thinking that we are caught in whirlpool of political energy that is sucking us into situations of less and less control. Instead, we must think of solutions that bring us greater control, freedom and expression.

One of the first steps is to institute a system whereby the people will be insured greater representation.

In the past when innovators have had new ideas, they started a new political party around it. In the United States this has been quite futile. The two most popular third parties in the United States are the Libertarian and the Green Party. There are many others of little influence that do not have a prayer of electing a national candidate.

Let us briefly touch on the strongest of the third parties. The Libertarians have as their major objective “liberty” as illustrated by their name. They basically believe that if we have two political choices we should pick the one that brings the greatest freedom.

I personally believe this is the highest objective of any of the parties as freedom and liberty is certainly a principle that the average people heartily support. So why have they never succeeded in getting any significant numbers of candidates elected? Why do they usually get less than one percent of the vote in national elections?

The answer is simple. People of today are attracted to the safety of the status quo and strong personalities more than ideas. This is why the good ideas of the Libertarians accomplishes very little. If they do start to catch on the major candidates will claim that they already have those bases covered so why vote for an unknown?

Even if we have the best ideas on God’s green earth a third party is not the way to go. Without a ton of money or a strong national presence it would take years to gain much momentum.

Instead, we will present here a solution which is unique in that it does not advocate the creation of any additional political party yet this organization will win elections with greater and greater regularity until all will join in with this system because it will bring true representation.

Instead of organizing a new political party that will struggle on for decades we will create a committee that will work with existing parties. If we can influence candidates in the existing parties to truly represent the will of the people then the mission is accomplished.

Here is how that can happen:

First, we will create an organization called “The Committee for Representation.” The name is not written in stone, but it should have the word “represent” in there someplace because that will be its core purpose – to bring representation to the people.

The purpose of this committee will be to commit the various politicians to directly represent the will of the voters. This effort will at first be a futile one with those already elected so concentration must be placed on those who are willing to make an initial run for the office.

Here is what the committee will do. It will approach a candidate with this proposition: “Our organization will help you get elected if you are willing to make an ironclad commitment to vote the will of the people you represent, but then, after you are in office, if you break your pledge, you will suffer humiliation of dishonor and all of our support will be withdrawn and we will assure that you will not become reelected.”

The point of power for the people is before the election because it is at this time that the candidate will do almost anything to obtain the office. Still this pledge is not to be taken lightly because it does require a large sacrifice from the ego of the politician. It demands that he or she recognize that the voice of the majority of concerned citizens is more important than that of one’s own little will. Therefore, one with an inflated ego will not even work with the Committee because big egos run for office thinking they knows better what is good for the people than the people themselves. In rare exceptions this may be true of sincere servants of humanity, but since we cannot depend on such people obtaining office we must look to the will of the people for safety.

Now the politician may say, “Sure I’d be happy to vote the will of the people, but isn’t that what a representative does anyway?”

The answer is no. Most politicians only listen to the will of the people when it puts their reelection on the line. The Committee has a better plan and here is how it works:

Any citizen who is willing to participate can apply to the Committee and become registered as a Co-Legislator. Then as a Co-Legislator you review various items coming up for vote and study them out and vote for them just as if you were a member of Congress yourself. The Committee then tabulates the vote and passes it along to the endorsed Congressperson. The elected Representative who is then sponsored by the committee is now committed to vote the will of the majority no matter what personal feelings on the matter are.

Can you see what this accomplishes? In one master stroke the seven obstacles to the will of the people are nullified.

[1] Polls. It doesn’t matter what the polls say – the representative must vote according to the real will of the informed people casting an actual vote.

[2] Political action groups. It wouldn’t matter how much money they give to candidates’ election because they are committed to vote the will of the people rather than the action committee.

[3] Lobbyists. The Lobbyists could wine and dine the Representative all they want and would have little or no influence because the guy has to vote the will of the people.

[4] Trading votes. Representatives cannot trade votes because the final vote no longer belongs to them, but to the people.

[5] Ignorance. Ignorance is eliminated because the Co-Legislators with enough interest to vote on a matter have usually checked into it and become informed on the subject.

[6] Pressure from party leaders. The party leaders can pressure the Representative all they want but he or she is committed to the will of the people above the party so they will be ignored.

[7] Prejudice. Molecular candidates have already committed themselves to lay aside their prejudices. If they cannot commit to do this they will not be endorsed by the Committee.

Now just wait a moment says the skeptic. This may sound good but it just will not work. There are too many flaws in human nature. When our guys get to Washington and all this pressure is put upon them, they will ignore the votes of the people who elected them and vote the way they see fit.

This will definitely be a problem to be dealt with but it is a problem that will be solved. We do not know all the solutions before all the problems arise, but we can present some of them.

First, the Committee will not endorse a candidate who has a history of lying or not keeping promises. All other candidates of good report from all parties are welcome to apply for endorsement.

Then we get definite signed commitments from endorsed candidates to vote according to the expressed will of the people. If they break this pledge, even once, then the support of the Committee is withdrawn and the chances are that they will lose the next election. In addition to losing the next election they will be disgraced the moment the pledge is broken because the Committee will publicize the fact that a Representative violated the pledge.

If you do not think that this concept has power just look what happened to George Bush Sr. in 1992. Shortly before the election he had one of the highest approval ratings in history – around 90%, but then his opponents hit him hard on his broken promise of “no new taxes.” This resonated strongly with the American people and he lost the election.

It may seem that honor and personal integrity is a thing of the past, but in reality, it is never lost. Whenever we reach a period in history where we seem to be at a low point then we see an individual or group comes forward and demonstrates true honor anew, the value of it is registered in the consciousness of many people and a new cycle is begun.

It is interesting that when the Founders of the United States signed the Declaration of Independence that one of the things they pledged and put at risk was their “sacred honor.”

How long has it been since honor has been thought of as a sacred thing? Too long. At this point in time honor is at such a low point that we expect to be betrayed by those whom we are supposed to trust. Then when we are betrayed, we throw our hands in the air and say “same ol’ same ol’.” But the time is approaching when honor must be restored to its proper place as a “sacred” characteristic not to be compromised. The time is come that those who betray us are not accepted as just “being human,” but for being a traitor to human dignity and achievement.

The Committee for Representation will use every possible legal and ethical means to restore honor as a sacred principle in the consciousness of the nation and world and put as much pressure as needed on the Representative to keep his pledge.

Question: So what if the guy does not keep his pledge? What can the Committee do?

Answer: If the Representative is totally dishonorable there is little we can do. The Committee can publicly announce the betrayal and call for the Representative’s resignation and then support a different candidate in the next election. If public opinion is roused enough some of the dishonorable ones will resign. If nothing else, the public disgrace will be enough to send a message to the other endorsed Representatives to not betray their word.

Question: You say the voting is done by Co-Legislators. How are they selected?

Answer: They select themselves. This position is open to all legal voters of all races color and creeds. All a voters have to do is to prove they are a citizen and a potential voter in the district or State of the Representative or Senator with whom one is going to Co-Legislate.

Question: How will the Co-Legislator cast his vote?

Answer: After the voter’s identify is proven the co-legislator will be given an e-mail address that is to be used exclusively for voting. Only one address will be given per voter and only one vote on an item can be cast per address. When voters are properly set up to vote then they merely send it through the Internet on a secure program thar will be developed.

Question: How will the Co-Legislator get information about upcoming bills and items to vote on?

Answer: Fortunately, in this technological age we have easy access to information through the Internet. The Committee with the help of the Representatives will gather all information on upcoming items that are coming up for vote and will post them on the Web. The voters can then download information on items of interest, study them and vote according to their viewpoints.

In addition to the cut and dry wording of the various pieces of legislation, the Representative and the Committee will also post news articles, columns and comments made by people of prominence about the legislation.

Representatives will also post their opinions about the matter and whether or not they think the vote should be yes or no. If they are doing their job properly their opinion will carry quite a bit of weight with the voters because they will often have insight that others may lack.

Nevertheless, voters are free to accept or reject the Representative’s suggestion.

Question: Not everyone uses technology or is computer literate. How are these people supposed to vote?

Answer: If they do not have a computer they can go to the public library and set up an e-mail account and also gain internet access.

On the other hand, if they have a complete block about using computers and wouldn’t know what to do if they had one, they can then go to one of the offices of the Committee for Representation. There a volunteer will set them up with an e-mail account and do all the computer work for them. Hard copies of all legislation will be available for the untechnological people and copies will be made and distributed on request. Thus even the most computer illiterate among us will have full access to all information and voting privileges.

We might note here that we are approaching a time in which close to 100% of the people use technology to some degree. Techno literacy will soon be an insignificant problem.

Question: Many people are very incredulous of poll results and are down on the idea of voting by polls. Wouldn’t this be a similar thing?

Answer: Not at all. As we previous discussed polls can be manipulated and very deceptive but a direct vote from an informed people is a true representation of what they really desire.

Co-Legislators do not receive some phone call while they are in the middle of dinner asking their opinion on something they could care less about. Instead, they select items that are of interest to themselves and vote because they are informed and concerned. This produces a much more intelligently cast vote than any poll and brings true representation.

Question: So what are the elected officials supposed to do? Twiddle their thumbs?

Answer: We admit that they will not be as occupied with lobbyists, action committees and fundraisers as much as other legislators, but they should be busier than ever concerning the people’s business.

This new generation of legislators will not be in the position for the power but for service to their country. The motto will be: “What can I do for my country?”

As true public servants they will be looked upon more as managers and teachers by the voters rather than those who vote their own will.

As managers they gather data and inform their constituents. As teachers they explain the issues at hand so the Co-Legislators can make the most intelligent of decisions.

Question: What if the legislator has to vote yes on a bill that is totally contrary to either one’s conscience or good sense?

Answer: There will be times that the various legislators will disagree with the vote of their Co-Legislators, but they will be tested for their open mindedness before they are endorsed by the Committee.

For instance, one of the hottest topics of the day is abortion. Feelings are very strong in both directions. If the Committee were in place today one of the questions to be asked  potential legislators would be something like this: “If an abortion bill came up for vote would you be willing to vote the will of the people above your own in the matter?

If they cannot answer yes to this and other questions on controversial issues then the Committee could not endorse them.

Those in support of this new system will come to realize that they may not get their way all the time, but that the votes cast will overall be in a safe and sane direction that brings more opportunity to the common people and less intrusion of government into our lives.

I recently heard a commentator make a shrewd observation. He said that both the Democrats and Republicans support government intrusion into our lives. The Democrats want economical intrusion and the Republicans want moral intrusion. Through the Committee for Representation, we can assume power to limit both forms of intrusion into the comfort zone of the average person, which is not now the case.

Question: I have to admit that this idea sounds pretty good. It seems like it should be an easy sell.

Answer: Nothing innovative, no matter how good it is, is easy to sell to the masses. In general people are skeptical of new things. The first thing they look for is the sinister motive behind the initiator.

My answer to that problem is the question: what could be sinister about the will of the people being represented more completely?

Nothing.

On the other hand, there will be enemies of this idea and it will be interesting to see them crawl to the surface. Many current politicians who enjoy the full power of their office and delight in being catered to because of having the full power of their vote will certainly be negative on the concept. Lobbyists who will lose much of their power will fight it tooth and nail. Party leaders will be aghast because they will no longer be able to command voting blocks as they have in the past. Some will be up be upset that they can no longer trade votes.

In addition to this many fringe groups on the edge will be upset that their ideas will have little chance of getting public attention because the common sense of the Co-Legislators will override extreme ideas that are dangerous to the nation.

On the other hand, a common sense fringe group has a good chance of going mainstream through the new system.

If an idea is truly good it will sooner or later be embraced by the majority.

Question: You seem talk about national politicians, but how about State and local governments and the Presidency itself?

Answer: This process is most needed among national Representatives and Senators. It could also be used to a degree with a cooperating President. As it is instituted effectively on a national level then we can see more clearly about how it can be applied to lower-level offices, but currently most local representatives are more in harmony with the will of the people.

Question: Is this concept Constitutional?

Answer: Yes. It works within the framework of the established Constitution and national laws. That’s the beauty of it. The Committee for Representation works within the framework of the establishment. It will be like a shot of strong medicine given to a sick body.

Once this new system is securely in place party affiliation will fade into the background for it will not matter which party is elected, and the keynote for government becomes unity not division.

An expanded presentation of this is given in my book Molecular Politics – Fixing America.

 

To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.

“Search” site:freeread.com

To access all the chapters so far see the directory at the top middle next to the meme.

For videos explaining the Molecular Relationship go HERE:

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Chapter Forty-Two
Molecular Details

The purpose of the Molecular Business is to duplicate nature. There is plenty of oxygen in the air out there for all of us. Similarly, there is plenty of money for all, and if we create a living business, it can breathe in all the money it needs, just as a living body can draw in all the needed oxygen.

However, objectors may say there is a limit on the money we can draw. They say this because they does not understand what money is. Money is merely a symbol of the labor which has created wealth. In other words, money is created by labor. Without the existence of labor, money would be without value and meaningless. Just like the body is only limited by the amount of oxygen it draws from the number of breaths it takes, so is the Molecular Business only limited to the amount of money it can draw from the labor it generates. There is no reason why all cannot live in abundance, for the Molecular Principle creates maximum efficiency and potential for unlimited wealth for all involved.

If small business entrepreneurs succeed, they can create a comfortable living for theselves. Even so, if a Molecular Business is to succeed, all employees (who are an expansion of the one-owner concept) may have to sacrifice, at first, so they too, as a whole, can enjoy an abundant life when success is reached.

When this equal payment principle is first explained, several objections surface: 1 Employees in a company wouldn’t go for it. 2 You have to pay a high wage to get skilled employees. 3 No one would have the prospect of a high salary and everyone would have starvation wages.

OBJECTION ONE: On the surface, those who believe that employees would not go for the equal wage are correct. That is, it would be almost impossible to convince employees in orthodox businesses to change their wage structure in any direction but immediately up, especially those in the higher income bracket. You cannot put new wine in old bottles.

Therefore, the solution to objection one is to put the new wine in new bottles. All Molecular Businesses, in the beginning, will have to be built from the ground up, and in so doing, will have no problem attracting employees. As long as the standard wage being offered is a competitive one, there will always be a surplus of job applicants. The Molecular Business will not have to draw in established executives from established businesses demanding exorbitant salaries. It will evolve all the executive talent needed from the pool of ground level employees to create a well-oiled machinery.

Multi-Level marketing companies have already proven that this can be done. All people join these companies at ground level, and those who rise to the top (many making over ten times the average salary) are often from the ranks of very common people, such as janitors, laborers, teachers, salesclerks, etc.

OBJECTION TWO: It would seem that we could not pay an equal wage to everyone. Even if we could pull the managers from the ranks, there are usually certain skilled individuals such as engineers, lawyers, draftsmen, accountants, and so on who expect a fairly high starting wage.

The Molecular Business will put a lot of emphasis on training while on the job. Oftentimes individuals will go to school four or more years to learn a trade and then find that most of their learning for actual job performance comes from their working experience. Some jobs that are normally assumed by trained people can be taken by others who are trained on the job. Accounting is a good example. With the new computer programs taking a lot of the busywork out of keeping records and simplifying the learning process, accounting procedures can now be quickly taught to most anyone of average intelligence.

Thus, not only can all executives evolve from the ranks, but so can many skilled workers.

Nevertheless, it is recognized that there will be a need, now and then, to acquire a skilled employee at whatever cost the company has to pay. Even in this case a person of such skill may be attracted to the Molecular Business for a number of the following reasons: 1 The combination of cash, stock and other benefits will, most probably, reach a higher total that what he would receive in working for anyone else. 2 There would be great job satisfaction in working in a democratic business. 3 The combined prospect of long-term financial gain, security and job satisfaction is greater in the Molecular Business than any other.

Nevertheless, if it comes down to the fact that the Molecular Business must pay a higher than normal wage to hire a crucial employee, then it always has that freedom to do so. There are never any rules that cannot be changed by the democratic process. Flexibility and adaptability are always key factors in growth.

It comes down to this: The Molecular Business always has full power to draw the talent it needs to accomplish its objectives.

OBJECTION THREE: When the principle of equal wages is explained many think that wage will be a starvation wage. It is hard for many to conceive of abundance for all.

First, one must remember that the wage is a combination of cash, stock and benefits. Their total combination will equal an attractive overall wage. The cash wage may not be a large amount when the company is first starting, or in hard times but we will not be looking for employees that are after all-you-can-get-for-the-present-moment. We will be looking for those who want to build a secure and prosperous future as well as initiating a constructive worldwide change.

When the Molecular Business first starts then, it is true, that its wages may be at a lower point than after it becomes established. So why not wait until after it succeeds and then join it?

The answer is quite simple. If it succeeds, those who started the company will have a tremendous financial advantage because part of their payment is always in stock. Stock purchased at the beginning of a successful company will multiply many times in value after it gets established. Therefore, what may appear to be a lower starting wage may turn into a literal bonanza.

Then after the Company has become prosperous, the general wage will become more and more attractive until it will reach the point that employees of orthodox businesses will desire that their companies turn Molecular.

There are two points here that will need some clarification: 1 How is the take home wage and stock allocation decided? 2 Workers need monetary incentives to make them perform. How is this taken care of?

The Take Home Wage

All employees in the Molecular Business have some hand in determining their wages. No facet, operation or financial matter will be hidden from them. Meetings will be held periodically to present to all employees recent financial, production and sales information. It is at meetings such as these that proposed changes in wages will be presented.

Wage increases or any other major change will evolve in the following manner: The President of the Company will study and receive counsel on the financial strength of the Company as to whether it could support a raise in employees’ salaries. All financial detail is available to all employees, so the CEO will also be receiving feedback through executives and workers about the popular opinion of the employees concerning an increase.

The President and the Board of Directors will generally meet once a month and the possibility of a wage change will be tossed around there when appropriate. Here they will receive counsel from the board. When the time is right, the President will make a proposal on a wage adjustment (either up or down) and call for a vote.

If the proposal is not passed by a two-thirds majority of the Board, then the President can make a second proposal and another vote will be taken. The President can keep presenting alternatives until two-thirds of the board reaches agreement. If they are unable to reach agreement, then no change in wages will be created.

If the President’s choice is passed by a two-thirds majority, then that decision will be presented for popular vote along with a written proposal that all employees will receive outlining the wisdom of the motion. The employees will then vote on the matter, and if a majority approve, then the proposal goes into effect. If it is not approved then there will be no change until another, more acceptable proposal, passes through the Board to receive approval of the employees.

This procedure is the same for all major companywide policy changes.

The second method of paying employees is through stock. Everyone will receive the same cash wage but employees will receive different amounts of stock according to their position in the company. For example, the ground level employee may receive a set cash wage plus a 25% additional value in stock. (Not a fixed amount) The first level manager may receive the same cash wage plus 50% additional. The second level manager may receive a wage plus 75% additional and so on up. The amount of stock given for each position will be determined by the voting procedure mentioned above.

The payment in stock will be allocated in such a way that it can only be redeemed for the following reasons: 1 Retirement. 2 Payment of child support 3 Resignation or firing. 4 A donation to a non-profit organization. 5 A financial crisis. 6 Seed money for employees to start a business of their own which will be linked with the original Company.

This has a multi-fold beneficial effect. First it provides a great avenue of security for employees. Instead of retiring in poverty, they will retire with abundant resources.

Next it will give employees incentive to pay their child support and not detract from their take-home pay. Currently, child support is a great hardship and sacrifice for the person who has to support two families.

If the person quits, or gets fired, he or she has a right to cash in stock. Many, however, may want to leave the investment in the Company, even after quitting, if the Company is growing.

To avoid the problem of an employee quitting, cashing in his stock, then being rehired, an employee cannot be rehired for a period of two years after he has taken his stock.

The fourth point will increase donations to charitable causes and is also tax-deductible.

The stock can also be used as a cushion to help in a financial crisis. The Molecular Business will maintain a good benefit program in case of ill health and accident, (and also support alternative and preventative health care). You never know when some unexpected financial demand may come up. Therefore, the Company shall set up an emergency procedure whereby the employee may petition to receive stock or a loan against the stock.

The sixth, and one of the greatest benefits, of the stock program is the power to use it to become an entrepreneur. In the world today there are many who dream of owning their own business, but never seem to have the working capital to do so. The power to start a business that requires some capital seems to be dished out somewhat randomly. There are a few strong-willed individuals who have managed to get the backing and savings to do it by themselves, but most have help from parents, relatives or friends with money. How about the person who has ambition, but no friends with money and is in a no-win situation as to saving money?

The Molecular Business is the great equalizer in this case. It provides an avenue whereby all people can set aside a nest-egg so when the time comes, they can exercise their power to initiate.

Any time employees have a feasible plan to start a business they can cash in their stock to finance it. They can either do this themselves or with partners. Furthermore, if the plan looks good and financial circumstances permit, the parent company may even loan them the additional money needed to finance the enterprise.

Why will it do this?

Because anything initiated with money from company stock or funds is linked to the parent Molecular Business, making it grow, and is to be operated under the same Molecular principles as the original Company.

The person who initiated the branch business is the rightful heir to the presidency of the company until such time as he or she withdraws by their own free will or pressure from the company because of bad decisions. This usually will not happen, however, as the initiate of a successful company generally sees the vision of company goals with the clearest sight and is the best one to run it.

The stock and wages paid in the branch company will be determined independently and may be different than the parent company. The reason for this is that it may make a greater or lesser profit than the originating Company. Nevertheless, it will operate on the same principles as the parent Company and everyone’s take-home wages within the company will be the same.

When the Molecular Business proves itself successful in principle many branch companies will be established and many faltering companies will turn Molecular. Each of these will be independent, yet linked in hierarchical formation to the Parent Company. The eventual goal will be to equalize the take-home wages so all are the same in standard-of-living value, and the end goal of that equality is abundance for all.

The reason we have put so much emphasis on the stock program is that this is one of the crucial points in making the Molecular Business successful. The sale of stock is one of the prime methods of producing working capital, and many large businesses depend on it. Setting up this program where all surplus employee funds are placed in a stock program will give the business even more than working capital. It will give it expansion capital and power to assist its workers to make their own dreams a reality by starting their own business which shall be linked to all other Molecular companies. The average person does not realize the power this will give a business to succeed and also compete with all other businesses, foreign and domestic.

Often when a company is short of funds, it will borrow at a high rate of interest, with company assets at risk as collateral. Not only are the company’s assets at stake, but the interest must be paid back… every dollar paid on interest is a dollar that cannot be used to benefit employees.

Thus we can see that this stock program will allow us to start the most financially potent company in history, but it is not to be feared as some fear large corporations today. The Molecular Business does not have great benefits paid out to the few, for all are owners. It is for the benefit of the common person. The Molecular Business is not to be feared unless common people with financial freedom are to be feared.

I’ve always liked Abraham Lincoln’s statement: “God must have loved the common people, he created so many of them.”

 

Employee Incentives

One of the biggest objections to the whole Molecular Business concept is the fear that the employees will have little incentive to perform. Since all are receiving the same wage, one may ask, then why would anyone want to work extra hard to get ahead?

This is a good question, and one of the best ways to see the answer is to go back to the Parable on the Body after it became sick. To the cells that were hoarding, it seemed like suicide to go back to the sharing principle. At the time it seemed to them as if the only motivation left in life was to get ahead. As the parable illustrates, this is true as long as we are placed in a situation where the keynote is: “Each man for himself.”

When this is the keynote of a people, then an individual sacrifice will often accomplish nothing. It takes a group endeavor, as illustrated by the cells, to prove the Molecular Principle.

When the Molecular Principle is in operation there is plenty of incentive, as illustrated by the cells in the Body when it became well and is illustrated by the cells in our own bodies every day. If we disagree, we are saying that we, as greater lives, are not capable of the same degree of cooperation as the lesser lives within us. If we think this we are deceived. We, as greater lives, are capable of even greater unity. Our problem is that we are in the embryonic stage of producing it. Sooner or later the ideal is always reached. Let us not give up striving toward it.

There are a number of incentives to enhance employee production that can exist in the Molecular Business.

First there is a monetary incentive. Even though everyone receives the same take-home wage, there is still quite a bit of incentive here. For starters, there will be greater monetary security here and full-time employment. Feeling sure you will have a job tomorrow means a lot and has great financial value. An unemployment period of six months can wipe out years of savings if assets are repossessed.

The second incentive is the stock payments. Here, payments are dependent on the importance of your job. We have already discussed how this can be used, so we can see that this will be an incentive to the employee to take responsibility and will greatly add to his future security. Many will see the stock payments as more of an incentive than cash if the company is growing.

The third incentive is the actual take-home paycheck. It will fluctuate as the company goes forward or backward. If everyone does their job well, then the company makes more money, and if the company makes more money, the employees can take a hike in pay.

There are other things the Company can do. If speed in production is essential for a certain department, then instead of assigning the group the task of working eight hours a day and going home, they can be assigned the task of creating a specified number of their production units in a day. If they get them done in six hours instead of eight, they can either go home or work overtime. If quality is the most important item, then a bonus system can be worked up on this.

Bonuses and recognition will be a key ingredient in the Molecular Business. Conservation of cash will be important as the company is growing; therefore, in recognizing achievement, the Company will emphasize bonuses in stock, dinners, vacations, privileges and a lot of pats on the back.

If workers need extra money, they can work overtime. This will be a means of earning extra take-home pay.

A fourth incentive in working for the Molecular Business is that it encourages initiative and will help its workers get started in businesses of their own. Even if employees do not start business of their own they will find working in the Molecular Business will give them so much freedom it will be just about like being self-employed. Each manager will be like a steward over their responsibilities, and it will be close to creating the feeling that it is their own business enterprise.

A fifth incentive for employees (and this one may prove to be greater than any monetary payment) is that the workplace of the Molecular Business will be where their friends are. They will enjoy the working atmosphere and it will be close to impossible to have the harassment problems and lack of freedom that exists in a regular business. Some employees will rather be Molecular even if they are making half the money. The work will be enjoyable and stimulating and at the same time workers will realize they are working in an organization where everyone is interdependent and everyone is helping everyone else.

The sixth incentive occurs when an employee figures out how to do the job better. When this happens, the cost of production goes down and the wages go up. Those who help to accomplish this will be recognized and receive great admiration from peers because they helped them to receive a higher paycheck.

We could go on and on, but the basic principle is this: When employees have enough money for their needs, good benefits, job security, retirement security, enjoyable work, freedom to work at their highest potential, freedom of expression and activity and the potential to increase their income indefinitely – where else will the guy go?

The Molecular Business will be like family, and no one wants to leave family.

Speaking of families, the Molecular business will encourage spouses with a reasonable amount of marital stability to work together on the job. If the marriage is good then working together will make it better and they can be a powerful team.

If the relationship is not stable, they would be better off working apart. The point is that many businesses refuse to let a husband and wife work together. This is an infringement on their freedom. If they desire to do so they should have that option.

To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.

“Search” site:freeread.com

To access all the chapters so far see the directory at the top middle next to the meme.

For videos explaining the Molecular Relationship go HERE:

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

 

Chapter Forty-One
Parable Of Abundance

Perhaps a parable would help us comprehend Molecular Principles as applied to business.

In the beginning, there lived a Body that dwelled in the land of Fresh Air. The Body saw that there was beautiful, clean, fresh air as far as they eye could see with all the life-giving oxygen one would ever need. The Body also saw the impossibility of ever having a shortage of oxygen because, after it breathed it in, it breathed it out in a different form that was food for plants. The plants showed their appreciation by reciprocating and regenerating more oxygen usable for the Body. Thus, the Body lived in a cycle of endless supply and expected to have abundance forever.

All the cells in the Body were also very happy and content. They drank deeply from the great breaths of oxygen the Body took. No one ever thought of saving, or hoarding, for all had everything they needed. The brain cells needed a little more than some of the others, but no one seemed to mind, for they all had abundance, and since all were fulfilled, everyone was considered equal. They functioned in perfect cooperation with the realization that all cells must be fulfilled for the Body to be healthy, and the Body must be healthy for individual cells to be fulfilled. Thus, they realized their interdependence, and with this realization came sublime independence. The Body lived in a state of perfect functioning for a long long time until one day the land of fresh air was visited by a sick Body that was near death. This Body was off color, contorted with some dread disease, the eyes were cloudy, its temperature was hot, its breaths were shallow and quick and it could barely stand.

The sick Body told the healthy one: “I have one last request before I die. Share this apple with me and I will lie down in peace.” The sick Body took a bite and handed it to the healthy one. The healthy Body looked on with pity and took a bite, but when it did something strange happened. One of the cells from the sick Body hopped off onto the bite taken by the healthy one. The cell knew the Body it was in was dying and saw an opportunity to start a new life in the healthy Body.

Unfortunately, the foreign cell brought with it the philosophy from the dying Body, a philosophy completely unknown and unthought of by the cells in the healthy Body.

In the sick Body, from whence came the foreign cell, there always seemed to be a lack of oxygen. At times they made futile attempts at sharing and being interdependent, but separateness seemed to prevail and the cells lived in a constant fear of lack. As the Body grew sicker and sicker they seemed to be forced more and more to hoard up oxygen for themselves, or else they would not have enough for the morrow.

Now the foreign cell had just come out of this great struggle. It was one of the stronger ones and always seemed to be able to garner enough to insure its own strength, often at the expense of others, and when it found itself in a healthy Body with an abundance it was quite excited. It immediately started gathering around itself all the oxygen it could store. After this was complete, it created storage containers and hoarded still more.

Some of the healthy cells were curious about this and gathered around to watch. They had never seen anyone hoard oxygen before. No one had even thought about it, for they had always lived in natural abundance. They had to ask: “Friend, why do you waste your time gathering around you oxygen when we live in perpetual abundance? There has never been a need for such a task.”

“You are ignorant fools!” said the foreign cell. “You assume that just because you had abundance in the past that you will have abundance in the future. I know from experience that this is not the case. I originated from another Body that was once healthy like this one, but health is a whimsical thing. Sometimes it is there and sometimes it is not. You have been fortunate that you have always had abundant oxygen. If your Body were to have an extreme shortage, in your ignorance, you would all starve to death, for none of you have ever had any oxygen put away. In your blindness you have always thought that you have had nothing to worry about. It is now time for you to wake up and take responsibility for your own health.

“Look at me,” he said. “If this Body were to get sick, as my previous Body did, and have an extreme shortage of oxygen, then I would be the only one here that would continue to have abundance. You would then look like fools and look toward me as your savior.”

The healthy cells listened in stunned silence. “We have always assumed that there would always be abundance,” they said. “Tell us what happened in your Body.”

“We lived the good life like you for a while,” said the foreign cell. “But all good things must end. Certain wiser cells realized this and started teaching others about the potential crisis. Some listened and started saving for the evil day. It’s a good thing we did because it was not long before we needed it. When the shortages came the ignorant ones who had saved nothing, but trusted to the abundant supply, were caught with their pants down. They suffered and tried to get those with savings to share with them, but they would not. If those wise ones who saved shared with those who had not, then neither would have enough. The shortage got worse and worse until all were force to take what they could. Now I was one of the few who never had lack all the way through the great ordeal and I am the only cell to yet remain alive. If you want to learn how to survive the coming crisis, that I am sure is coming to this Body, then you should listen to me.”

“What shall we do?” asked the other cells.

“We must labor diligently to gather and store up additional oxygen. I will be your leader and guide you in this for a percentage of what you gather, and surely I will be your savior; for I am the only one here with knowledge of things to come.”

The word of this new philosophy spread throughout the Body and caused a great consternation and division among the cells. Most did not believe there would ever be such a shortage, but some did and joined with the foreign cell in hoarding the oxygen.

After a period of time, those who did not hoard found that they were indeed suffering a lack, yet they continued sharing that which they had with each other and managed to survive all right. On the other hand, the hoarding cells took joy in the seeming correctness of their moves and lorded over the other cells. “See, we told you this would happen. Look at us. We have more abundance than ever because we worked harder than you and put away for the evil day.”

Some of the non-hoarding cells felt foolish at this and joined in with the hoarding cells and united with them in labor to gather all the possible oxygen.

As time passed the shortage among those who did not hoard became very severe. So great was their lack that many cells began to die. Those who remained were exceedingly alarmed and decided to cease any sharing and join the hoarders. Each cell had to gather what it could for itself. Thus, all the lives in the Body found themselves in the midst of a great struggle for survival, and the Body as a whole became very sick, approached the point of death and called in a friend who had once been sick to the point of death but survived.

The friend said: “This disease is a mystery. I am one of the few who was able to make a complete recovery and I know not why. But I do remember that I did begin to get better right after my father shared a glass of sweet nectar with me.”

The sick Body then asked: “Will you share a glass of nectar with me in the same way.”

The friend agreed and took a glass of nectar, first taking a drink himself and then giving to the sick Body to drink.

Now, one of the cells in the friend’s Body, who had lived through the disease and recovered, desired to help his millions of brother cells in distress and hopped into the nectar and was transported to the sick Body.

When it arrived there it found a sad state of affairs. Cell was struggling against cell in a fierce battle for survival, oxygen and control. Very little cooperation seemed to exist. The visiting gell cried out: “Listen to me, Oh ye cells, for the Body does not have to die and you do not have to lack. I come from a Body that had great health, then was sick, but was later healed, and I know the secret of healing.”

Most thought the newcomer was a crackpot, but a few listened. “There is plenty of oxygen for all,” he continued. “We must return to being our brother’s keeper, stop the hoarding and cooperate with each other. Then all will have abundance.”

A heckler came forward: “When the shortage first occurred, we tried that and it did not work. Our only salvation is to follow the example of the foreign cell and work to gather surplus.”

The newcomer spoke again: “It only seems that way. Your greed has led you into an illusion so deep that you cannot see your way out. The foreign cell came from a Body which died. I came from one that lived! Your whole problem is what you think is the solution. The greed and hoarding create the shortage. The Body breathes in enough oxygen for all. Labor for the health of the Body, and not your individual selves. The Body will give you all the oxygen you can possibly use just the way it used to be. The foreigner is not the solution to the problem. He IS the problem.

“Here is what we are to do: We must gather together all those who are willing to cooperate into one part of the Body to work and share together for the health of the whole Body as you did before. It will be difficult at first, and there will still be shortages for a while, because we will be in the midst of hoarders, but in time we will demonstrate the laws of abundance. When the others see it they will follow our example, for in their hearts they yearn to return to the abundant life as it was.”

The newcomer set his hand at gathering together all those who would listen to the message and began to practice an interdependent cooperative order.

Now when the foreign cell heard of this it was very angry, for it had been receiving much praise and adoration and had received glory for the vast supplies of oxygen it had accumulated. It also donated some surplus oxygen from time to time to get the support of comrades and was looked upon by many as a great benefactor.

The foreign cell spoke to his followers: “This upstart is a liar and deceiver. Do you really think it came here to help us? Of course not; it is after something. It wants power and dominion over you. Do you really think it came from a healed Body? I tell you there is no such thing. The struggle we are in will remain and those who are wise will have vast riches; whereas the ignorant will endure unspeakable suffering. If this poisonous philosophy the stranger teaches spreads, all of us will suffer. No one will have enough then. We will all be poor. We must attack this group of do-gooders and destroy them by completely shutting off their oxygen supply.”

Thus began the great war and struggle between the two groups of cells. The cooperative group was far inferior in numbers and many got discouraged and left, because for a time it seemed as if complete cooperation was impossible. But in the time of crisis the Body became aware that it could help itself by breathing more deeply and sent additional oxygen. Since it was a time of war, the cooperative group did all that was possible to gather oxygen for the group, but shared as one.

The uncooperative group gathered oxygen only on an individual basis and found their power to amass was not as great as it was, and, slowly at first, they found they were powerless to shut off their opponents’ oxygen. Next, they began losing their reserves. Then, after a time, this group began to suffer lack whereas the cooperative group had abundance.

The foreign cell became very wroth, gnashed his teeth with great anger and began to abuse fellow workers and ruled them with great fear. No one dared say it, but they now knew in their hearts that this foreign cell was not the benefactor they had thought. Finally, it used its power so obnoxiously that its own fellows rebelled, created a prison, and threw the cell in it. They then approached the cooperative cells, desiring to join with them, and asking them to share their surplus oxygen with them.

The visiting cell rejoiced at this, but desired to instruct them in the true principle of abundance, once and for all. It took all the surplus oxygen in the Body and released it so there was now no extra in existence. The cells all gasped with fear and disbelief.

“Do not fear, said the stranger. “I did this just to demonstrate that there need never be a shortage. There is always enough for all. Now here is all that we must do. Let no one try to hoard any oxygen. When the Body takes its next breath, only take that which you need for yourself and see what happens.”

They all did this with some apprehension, but everyone followed the instructions and did not hoard, but only took that which they needed. From that point in time on, to their delight, they found that every single cell in the Body had all the oxygen it could possibly use.

The Body was also delighted, for it experienced a miraculous recovery within a very short period.

All the cells in the Body were wiser now. They understood the principle of abundance and knew they would never lack again. Once in a while a foreign cell from a sick Body would drift into view and start hoarding everything in sight. Instead of joining him, this time they smiled knowingly and left him alone. After a while even the foreign cells lost interest in hoarding, for it had no meaning. After a time, they even let the first foreign cell out of his prison, for they saw he had no power to harm anyone and eventually even it stopped hoarding and came to believe in the principle of everlasting abundance for all.

To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.

“Search” site:freeread.com

To access all the chapters so far see the directory at the top middle next to the meme.

For videos explaining the Molecular Relationship go HERE:

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

 

Chapter Forty
How To Get Employees Involved

Employee involvement is a concern of every business, public and private, as long as there is one or more employees on the payroll.

How can it be accomplished?

How can employees be made to perceive themselves as part of the team?

How can they be made to feel and act more responsibly?

Numerous business courses, seminars and training meetings are held with this objective in mind.

Unfortunately, they all head the same direction. They teach the objective but not the solution.

The objective, of course, is to make the employee feel more involved like the business is his own. Numerous business courses hold this objective and vision before the eye of the student and point out how much more profitable the company will be if this is achieved. Benefits, benefits, benefits are listed, listed, listed…, but where is the solution???

All the energy aimed at a solution is always directed toward management rather than the bottom-line employee.

Basically, millions of dollars are spent in business courses for managers to aid employee incentive. The philosophy of such courses can be summed up in a nutshell as follows: The manager is supposed to be a nice guy and treat employees fairly, but also play games with them to make them feel involved. This leader is supposed to use a lot of common sense and lead in the most efficient manner and try to be one of the guys, yet maintain authority and respect. The Company is to give numerous pep talks and offer incentives to make employees produce more.

The ideas presented by management and motivational courses are good, but they all make the mistake of tackling the branches of the problem and not the root. All solutions are temporary and not permanent.

We have already solved half of the problem of employee motivation by introducing the election process whereby workers can elect competent managers over them. This alone may booster employee moral and production by a large margin.

What we need now is something to keep the incentive up day after day without the need of expensive courses and pep talks (which are minimal in their effects).

Wouldn’t it make sense to find the most motivated and involved worker there is, and then find out what it is that is the key to this person’s motivation and, finally, take that motivating factor and instill it in the common worker?

That makes sense, doesn’t it?

And who is the most involved and motivated worker in the world? Who will work fourteen or more hours a day up to seven days a week whether the company is making money or not? Who never steals from the company and always, that is always, works for its benefit? Who is ever encouraging others toward better performance and dedication? Who is willing to miss meals, time with family and friends, put off buying luxuries for the company’s sake, place marriage on the line, take chances, be available at a minute’s notice, doesn’t mind being awakened in the middle of the night with a company problem and virtually has an eternal affair going on with the business? Who is this person?

The owner.

Business owners are totally motivated and involved. It matters not if they have never seen a motivational or management course. They are involved in a way that managers only dream and wish their employees would be.

Ownership and control is involvement. It is a principle. It works automatically and does not have to be taught or learned. It just is.

Unless a person is completely indifferent to life, ownership brings an immediate sense of responsibility. There is probably no one more responsible and completely aware of the work that needs done than the small business owner.

Independent salespeople are also very motivated, for they have complete stewardship over their position and control over hours and workload.

Larger businesses have multiple owners. These owners still have a high sense of responsibility, but may have the disadvantage of one owner shifting responsibility to another owner.

Finally, we have the business which is largely owned by stockholders who are not employees. These non-participating owners are certainly concerned about the company, but often have their hands tied as far as affecting company profits. Even so, they have a strong sense of involvement with the company.

A general principle of success has always been to take a concept that works in one area and apply it in an adapted form to other areas.

If we want to instill a sense of involvement and responsibility in workers, we need to look at the most successful example: The small business owner. Therefore, we must take those principles that motivate this individual and apply them to all employees in a large business.

How do we do that?

We make all employees owners with a stewardship over their individual responsibilities.

How do we make them involved owners?

[1] All employees, even ground level workers who are just starting on the job, receive part of their pay in stock. Most other bonuses for performance are also paid in stock.

[2] Reversing the flow of authority of selection of key positions from the top down to the bottom up is a key ingredient to reversing this gap, but the next aspect we shall introduce should dispel this distance once and for all, and unite the various classes of a corporation into one working body.

[3] This next principle presented will be looked upon with a jaundice eye by many and will only be accepted by the world after it has proven itself beyond the point of argument. Only those who have nothing to lose, who are cooperative and team-spirited, will be able to embrace it at first. However, it should not be that startling. It is merely an extension of the most motivated worker in history: The small business owner.

Let us take the consciousness of the small business owner and visualize it spread over one thousand people in a large corporation. Let us see those thousand people as one entity operating a small business.

How is the salary of the small businessperson determined?

How then, will the one thousand workers pay themselves?

They will both be paid on the same principle.

The small businessman puts the business first, realizing that the main priority is to have operating capital. Without this, the business would die and have no possibility of expansion or independence. The secondary monetary priority is to have money to live on, or take-home pay The owner can only receive an income after operating expenses are paid.

The third priority is expansion capital. This is what is left over after the owner receives a livable wage and operating expenses. Sometimes though even take-home pay is sacrificed with the idea of expanding the business so take home pay will be much larger in the future.

The principles that work for a small business can also work for a 1000+-member corporation. Their first priority should be operating capital for supplies and overhead. Without enough of this the company will greatly suffer and be in danger of closing its doors. Many companies go out of business for just this reason.

Operating capital needs to be the top priority, but a supposedly benevolent objective sometimes gets in the way forcing some businesses to close their doors. That objective is that employees are always  to receive their full wage no matter what, even if the company goes broke and everyone loses their jobs and then makes money at all.

Can you see small business owners paying themselves full wages during a short month and then being unable to operate the business in the next month? No. They will not do this. They will eat beans, if necessary, during the short month and then take out extra during a good month. This flexibility gives the small business owner an interesting edge over the large corporation.

On the other hand, a large corporation has many advantages. Imagine the extra stability it would have if all workers were involved owners who felt responsibility for the company and were willing to sacrifice some of their paycheck during bad times and then pay themselves extra during good times. If a company had this flexibility, it would be almost impossible to go broke and it would give it a tremendous competitive edge.

The Molecular Business pays its workers differently than does the present authoritarian businesses. The workers get paid from two sources: stock and cash.

The amount of stock employees receive is dependent on the importance and skill of their jobs. The President of the Company, for instance, would receive much more stock than would the common worker, but all would receive some stock, thus all would be owners in one degree or another.

Employees cannot cash in stock as long as they work for the company. This insures equality and capital reserves for the company.  Employees can cash in their stock when terminated or retiring.

The unique and perhaps controversial aspect of their take-home pay is the amount of money each would receive. All employees, from the president down to the first level worker, would receive exactly the same wage. The only way that one employee could receive more cash than another is if one works overtime, yet the worker still has the option of receiving this in stock.

Think of the effect this would have on company moral and union. The President of the company and the common worker both receive the same wage.

This principle would do more to end the division between management and labor than any other move. When two people receive the same take home pay, they are automatically in the same class.

It is true that people of similar interests will still gravitate together, but in this pay situation, none would tend to feel that they are in a world apart or above their co-workers.

One important point overlooked here is that this principle works consistently in nature, and all great discoveries are made by observing nature.

All the fears of the Molecular Business are unfounded and are held together by the weak ego which sees not unity, but separateness.

Up to now all incentive in the business world has been built around the idea of separateness, of two classes. Those who make a lot of money and those who barely survive. Everyone wants to be in the class that makes the money, and it is recognized that the opportunity is open to all, but in the present system, abundance is only available to a small percentage. All have a chance to be in that percentage, but not all have the advantages necessary to get there.

Those who have made it look at the have-nots judgmentally and say or think: “I am successful because of my enterprise and skill, and there is no reason anyone else cannot do the same. The only reason the unsuccessful one does not have abundance is because he either does not think correctly, or is lazy.”

This may be true for some. On the other hand, there are many people who are industrious and try to think positive, but made some wrong choices, had some bad breaks, did not have rich or helpful parents to help them get started and numerous other reasons why they did not make it into that elite percentage.

Another point is that success studies show that a large percentage of those who do acquire substantial success struggled through many failures and near poverty until after the age of forty.

Do we look at these successful peoples’ early lives and say that the reason they never had success earlier is because they were lazy or had a bad attitude?

In the businesses of the Old Age this separative thinking prevails. The philosophy is basically: “Each man (or woman) for himself.”

The coming age will be much different (and better). The keynote will be: “I seek to fulfill my brother’s dreams and in doing so I fulfill my own. I and my brother are one.”

In the Old Age business, the dream is to be richer and better than your brother.

In the New Age the dream is equality and abundance for all.

As we have said, the Molecular Business is a natural principle. We will illustrate this by comparing it to nature. The workers in the business are like cells in our bodies. The money they are paid corresponds to oxygen.

In a healthy body one cell does not take a salary of ten units of oxygen and another cell, with the same needs, receives only one, but they both receive equal amounts. In times of health there seems to be little use in hoarding oxygen, for all cells can have all they need. What good does it do to have more than you need? It does not enhance health or happiness.

On the other hand, what happens if the body holds its breath and there is a shortage of oxygen? The cells cooperate and all take a little less. All suffer a little, none suffer a lot. The distress is merely a temporary inconvenience and when the body breathes again, abundance is restored.

To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.

“Search” site:freeread.com

To access all the chapters so far see the directory at the top middle next to the meme.

For videos explaining the Molecular Relationship go HERE:

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

Chapter Thirty-Nine
Hiring New Employees

Leadership in a new molecular company operates on the same principle as that in an established company. The leaders are all selected by popular vote and after the first round is selected the hierarchy is subject to rearrangement at any time.

New employees generally start at ground level, never on the managerial except in the creation of a new company. Even if they have had supervisory experience in the past, they will have to prove themselves anew in the Molecular Business. Others, of course, who have training in special skills such as engineering, architecture, law or some other specialty will not start out as a production worker. That would be counterproductive. A person with expertise should be able to start immediately using that skill. It is the positions of leadership that must be earned through the approval of peers. An occupational skill can usually be successfully taught, but leadership is something that must be demonstrated in the field to be believed.

Concerning hiring, the manager will do the interviewing and leg work involved, but before the final hiring the group will have a discussion and then a vote on the candidates.

When there is a job vacancy in any work group, notice will be given to all workers in the group that there is an opening, and if they know of anyone they would enjoy working with they may put the name in for consideration. The manager may also put names forward. If they are satisfied that they have enough names to consider they need look no farther. If they lack names the manager will make available to them recent applications that have been made. They will look over these to select the remainder of the people they wish to interview.

One item that is suggested here is that the Company employ a qualified handwriting analyst and include comments on the qualifications of the applicant with the application form. Having studied handwriting analysis for decades years I am well aware of the value of this tool. A good analyst can discover qualities about a person in minutes that may take five years for a business, or even friends, to know.

When the working group has what they consider to be a sufficient number of names for consideration, they will, as a group, review the details of each application and will interview each applicant. In the job hunter’s absence, the group will then vote. The same majority rule applies as described in the previous voting procedure.

The Manager

If managers do not hire, fire, make everyone nervous and scare the hell out of employees, then what do they do? The answer is quite simple…

The manager manages.

The one in charge might also be called a coordinator. The manager in the Molecular Business is the true servant.

The manger does not have final power to fire, but everyone recognizes that it is part of the job to see that everyone is performing as they should be. If not, he or she can call a meeting of the group any time and recommend some disciplinary action for a laggard. A good manager will have the support of the majority of the group and will be able to fire an employee who deserves it.

The same principle goes for hiring. A manager having the respect of the group will have an earned authority and will find the workers will often support suggestions which are given.

In all other areas not specifically limited by Molecular Business Principles, the manager has much more latitude and authority than one will in an orthodox business. In the regular business, the manager often has little authority to apply creative ideas to the job because they are always checked by someone on a higher level. In the Molecular Business the one in charge has complete authority to go ahead and initiate whatever seems to work as long as it does not interfere with the plans of the manager above him.

In the regular business a manager’s greatest authority is over the lives of subordinates. In the Molecular Business the manager has minimal authority directly over his subordinates, but has complete authority to carry out the designated job description.

Anyone in the working group can make suggestions, voice disagreements and add their wisdom without fear of reprisal, but it is recognized that the manager’s main job is to be a leader and to show the way to greater productivity.

In fact, this is why a manager is elected: simply because peers recognize him or her as the definite leader of the group. Thus the group will have a natural inclination to follow and be good team players.

The manager has power to make decisions for the group and set goals without asking anyone’s permission. Before making any major decision, however, the leader will be expected to present the details to his group for their input. The managers’ power are always checked in the fact that, if the workers’ feelings and desires are ignored, they will soon find themselves challenged and replaced.

Managers have freedom to make decisions for the group, as a whole, but this power is also checked in the fact that if they make bad decisions they will be challenged and replaced. The organization is set up so that the manager is literally forced to take the attitude of a servant, rather than one who must be served.

Managers are also teachers. They will teach the whole group ideas and concepts they see as pertinent to their success. They will either teach new employees their job or see that someone else does. They will also be a coordinator for the group where personality problems are concerned, and will help them find solutions so the group can function harmoniously.

After all comment and discussion have been made on a difficult decision, the manager’s decision is the final one. This is the end to which the leader was elected. If the decision is of poor quality then the manager can be voted out. Otherwise, as long as this does not happen, the employees are under an obligation to support and follow decision handed down.

This pattern somewhat follows that of representative government outlined in the Constitution of the United States. Legislators are elected to represent us. In the Molecular Business this same pattern is found. Managers are elected, then they represent the group. The group gives input, but the managers have power to make the final decision as to work goals and procedures, similar to the way they do now, but with less interference from above.

Nevertheless, the manager will find it extremely important to keep the goodwill of fellow employees and may ask for a vote of the workers on many items and make decisions based on majority vote. There are no black and white rules here. Rules cannot be made in advance for everything. Leaders in the various Molecular Businesses will solve their several problems as they come up.

The first-level managers, of course, have other managers above them. They have complete latitude over the implementation of plans as long as they are in alignment with the managers above themselves. This is their only restriction. The lower must always harmonizes with the direction of the higher until we come to the president of the Company where we will find a person with an army of workers under a unified direction. This will be a person who will have great employee support, not because of fear of an authoritative position, but because of earned and elected leadership.

The principles and powers we have discussed here that pertain to the first level manager apply to managers on all levels up to the President.

To summarize, the Molecular solution to incompetent management has many benefits:

[1] Intelligence will reach its own level quickly. Instead of losing brilliant people by shuffling them out or causing job burnout, the Molecular Business will draw them in and offer a consistently stimulating opportunity.

[2] Ground level workers will no longer feel like slaves. They will not be able to be fired according to the whim of the boss, and as long as they perform well, in the eyes of their fellow workers, they will have jobs.

[3] The employee will always have the freedom to work for the benefit of the Company as the top priority, not the boss.

[4] The worker will be able to participate in hiring co-workers so greater harmony is produced in the workplace.

[5] Incompetents are never locked into a position, but are placed back in areas where they can perform well.

[6] This solution will stimulate much greater efficiency and productivity and greatly enhance the profitability of the Company.

To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.

“Search” site:freeread.com

To access all the chapters so far see the directory at the top middle next to the meme.

For videos explaining the Molecular Relationship go HERE:

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

 

Chapter Thirty-Eight
The Selection of Key Positions

In the past, the selection of all positions in business has been determined from the top down. By top down we mean that those in higher authority choose all those who shall be in management below them. In the Molecular Business this process is reversed, and the determination is made from the bottom up. By bottom up we mean that those who work under a manager are the ones to choose who supervises them.

The reason that the business world has reversed this natural order is simple. To understand we must merely look at the evolution of a large company. A successful business is usually created by one person, or a small core of people. This person, or group, then proceeds either alone, or with partners, to create a structure. This is well and good so far, but after the organization is created, authoritarianism and selfish motives set in, and each manager sets up a power base for their own benefit and not for the welfare of the company.

Unprofitable managers will often fool everyone except those employees directly under them. To maintain their power, they must deceive those above him who have power to either remove or advance them. They deceive their superiors by blackmailing the only ones who are aware that they are incompetent: their subordinates. They let them know in certain subtle ways, that the employees understand perfectly clear, that the subordinates’ job and promotion potential is in the managers’ hands. Therefore, it is in the best interest of the employees to support their managers whether they be right or wrong.

If managers create programs that will lose the company money, for instance, the employees may see the flaws but be afraid to express them, for it may make the various managers look bad, and if they make their boss look bad, or even feel bad, their work stability may come under threat. Employees may know this because they voiced mild opposition in the past and it caused them problems. Now the underlings know it is best for them to always support the boss. The workers are thus forced into situations where they must choose between personal benefit and company benefit.

But if they choose the company benefit, the employees will not be in a position to be of any use for they will risk losing their jobs. Therefore, they will rationalize this situation with the thought: “If I choose personal benefit I can stay in the company and at the same time look for ways to quietly help the it.” They rarely find those ways, but the thought salves the conscience.

Thus we see the employees always (almost without exception) choose the personal benefit.

And who can blame them? Such is human nature.

The employees will support the managers in their bad ideas because, under the system, they benefit personally. In addition, they is fearful of any other choice.

If subordinates sees their managers lying, or presenting false pictures to superiors about employee performance, the employee is again faced with the choice of either benefiting the Company by exposing the truth, or profiting by supporting the deception.

Employee will, of course, support the deception. If they go above his boss’ head, the boss will never let them forget it and will look for every opportunity to slow their progress or get them dismissed.

If the manager steals, or takes undue advantage of the Company, the employee will generally remain silent because of the personal benefit.

If a manager fires one of their fellow employees unjustly, other employees may feel hurt for the person, but they will not vocally complain, for they sees they may be next on the list. Again, employees benefit by remaining the silent supporting worker. There has to be a lot of spiritual truth portrayed by the three monkeys who hear, see and speak no evil. The creator of this thought was probably thinking of the worker in the authoritarian system who has lost dignity and integrity as an individual and becomes as a scared monkey.

If managers lets employees assume some of their responsibilities (which they will take credit for) and then takes a three-hour lunch break, the workers will cooperate in shielding them from exposure, even if they are seething from resentment. Why??? Because it is in their best interests. They will figure that the Company must take care of itself.

If a manager had a fight with his wife one morning and takes it out on the subordinate by verbally abusing him and castigating him for wrongs he did not commit; the worker will take the abuse and complain very mildly, if at all, because his job survival is at stake.

We live in an age where we do not fear for our lives on a daily basis as some have in ages past. Survival is the strongest urge in humankind, and anything that threatens this creates the strongest possible fear. In the past, authorities manipulated this survival fear by threatening lives. Today it is jobs or promotions that are threatened, for the sense of survival is probably more strongly connected with our employment than it is with anything else, and when the possibility of termination arises, a deep-seated fear connected with the survival instinct arises.

In short, if  employees feel this great fear in connection with their jobs, then the managers assume the totalitarian power of a dictator over their job lives. In any dictatorship the subordinates will try to read the mind, thoughts, wishes and whims of their Holyship and carry them out without question or consideration of the common good. They do this because, under a dictatorship, the subordinates benefit when the superior is happy, whether the kingdom benefits or not. The health of the country, or company, is ALWAYS second to pleasing the totalitarian authority.

The time has come to free the slaves.

Slaves?

Yes, slaves. The Molecular Business is the new Emancipation Proclamation!

Think of it. Most of the workers in the free world are in a form of slavery. Part-time slaves perhaps – eight hours a day – but slaves nevertheless. Ask them and find out. Most will admit that they feel that way even though they may not like applying the word to themselves.

Some slaves are content with their lot; others are very resentful, but they are still slaves if they have no freedom of expression to a superior and must obey his every whim without question.

On the other hand, there are some slaves who have a good master. The tactful master may make his slaves feel like they are not really slaves at all, but are as free individuals, and if the slave and master have a good relationship the slave may be quite happy and content.

But they are still slaves. They would realize this if a pleasant manager is replaced by an egomaniac. They would then understand that the power structure they are in can be harmful to their freedom. They are slaves as long as the master, or manager, has complete power over their job life, and they, in return, have no power over the manager. They are slaves if they can only speak up if the manager allows them to.

Relief only comes when the taskmaster is a “nice guy,” but even then, a slave is still a slave. It’s the system that makes it so.

It’s time for a new system. The consciousness of the free world demands freedom on the job as well as off. That demand is to be met by the Molecular Business.

The idea is very simple and the seeds of its manifestation already surround us, but it has not demonstrated itself strongly in business for one major reason: People in authority love the power it gives them, and they will use this power, at all costs, to keep their area of dominion secure. Since that authority is almost impossible to remove once an organization has been established, it is not likely we will see the established companies turning into Molecular Businesses. The first Molecular Businesses will be entirely new enterprises. After some success we will see a number of faltering companies turning to it to save them from going under. Finally, after it has been proven to produce abundance, we will see the established businesses reluctantly turn to it. The reluctance will come from those who wish to hold onto their power over others.

The power to fill key positions in the Molecular Business will be reversed. Instead of having this power vested from the top downwards, it shall be given from the bottom upwards and shall be applied through a democratic system.

Let us say that company ABC is a Molecular Business and we are examining their first-level managers. (By first level we mean the lowest order of managers.) These are not selected by second-level managers, as is usually the case. Instead, they are elected by the employees they supervise. A company executive may make a suggestion, or nominate a prospective manager, but he or she does not choose who will fill the position.

Giving subordinates power to select their leaders, eliminates, in one master stroke, some of the major problems found in the business world. It neutralizes the Peter Principle which accurately tells us that, in the business world of today, each employee eventually reaches his highest level of incompetence then then just stays there.

What this Peter Principle tells us about today’s business is this: That workers continue to be promoted as long as they are doing well and are happy in their work, but as soon as they are given work that they cannot handle, or where they are incompetent, the promotions cease. They are not demoted back to jobs they can do well for two reasons: First it would hurt the poor guy’s ego to go backwards and take a lower-paying job; secondly, superiors would have to admit they made a mistake in the promotion. An authority, with dictatorship power, resists admitting error at all costs.

What therefore happens again and again is that employee after employee reaches their level of incompetence and stays there. We can look around us and see that every established company has a very high percentage of its management incompetent, and usually unhappy, at their jobs.

On one side of the coin this is funny, especially when we hear weird stories about dumb decisions and mistakes made by bureaucrats. We read the Dilbert comic strip and watch movies like Patch Adams, Dirty Harry, Rambo, Die Hard, or Good Morning Vietnam and laugh at the incompetency of the bosses and then squirm at how they do everything in their power to get in the way of the real hero. I liked Bruce Willis’ line to an incompetent police executive during a crisis in Die Hard: “You’re not a part of the solution, pal, you’re a part of the problem.”

These incompetents would be funny if they would restrict themselves to the movie world, but, as any person who is in contact with a hierarchical organization can testify, they are everywhere, affecting us, afraid to make progressive decisions, slowing us down and interfering with our standard of living, peace and happiness. When we are affected individually, it is no longer funny. It is sad. Something should be done about it.

A simple democratic process applied in the business world will automatically ensure that the incompetents are weeded out. Let us look at an example of how this selection process works in a Molecular Business in filling a vacancy for a manager over twelve workers.:

Unlike the businesses of today the Molecular Business does not wait around for a decree from an executive as to who will fill a vacant position. The position is open to anyone. Any one of the workers in a supervised group (let us say there  are twelve) may either volunteer themselves or nominate another. In addition to this, a worker from another department may also volunteer or be nominated. After all the candidates have stepped forward, then the twelve will hold an election. When one candidate receives more that 50% of the votes then this person becomes the new manager.

Each elected manager has to receive a majority of votes from his or her department to become elected. What happens if four are running and A gets 4 votes, B 4 votes, C 3 votes and D 1 vote? In this case no one received the majority. The solution is quite simple: They select the two with the highest votes, which were A and B, and then vote again. The one with the majority vote will win, unless there was a tie. In case of a tie the winner is picked by the next manager above them in authority.

One may justifiably ask the following question: What if the group was deceived into thinking that they chose a good manager and later found out this individual was an incompetent? Are they stuck with their bad choice?

No. The Molecular Business recognizes that no choice is infallible, and there will be many times that the first selection will not be the best possible. Only actual performance on the job can determine the qualifications of a leader. Promotions are filled by people who have potential to do the job, but have not yet proven themselves so mistakes are to be expected. Fortunately, the Molecular Business makes provisions for the correction of those mistakes whereas the orthodox business is crippled by them.

Anytime one of the subordinates feel they can do a better job than their superiors, they may challenge them for their position and call for a vote. The challenge will be accepted and a vote will be held by secret ballot presided over by one of the workers in the group. It is advisable that candidates not know who voted against them. Nevertheless, this is not a black and white rule. If the Company or a division thereof wants to have open voting, that also should be their choice.

All workers should be made aware of the voting outcome. If managers know they obtained their position by a majority of only one vote, they may try extra hard to do the job and keep their subordinates happy so a new challenger will not be able to replace him.

If challengers are defeated then they must wait a designated period of time, such as ninety days before they can issue a new challenge; otherwise managers may be in danger of harassment and distraction from their jobs.

When the aspiring managers are voted in, they will trade places with the current managers. The first line employees then become managers and the managers become the first line employees. If the now-replaced managers believe they have been unjustly treated, they can (after a period of ninety days) challenge the group for their old positions or apply for transfers to other departments of the Company.

It’s always possible that the former manager, and the person who replaces him, are both competent managers. Their working group may just be fortunate enough to have two high-quality individuals to choose from who are qualified to be managers. In this case, the former manager can seek a transfer to another group that lacks leadership and can then challenge the manager there if desired. In the Molecular Business, anyone who has talent should not have to let it go to waste.

If the new first-level managers are a people of ability and talent, they may soon discover that they are more capable than the second level individuals above them. As they sense this and prove themselves competent as first-level managers, then they may challenge those above them in hope of advancing another step.

If they succeed at this, then they may later challenge the third-level managers. Their only limitation is that they can only move up one level at a time. They will find that, just as water reaches its own level, so does intelligence reach its correct level in the Molecular Business. If they can prove themselves qualified to lead the whole company, then there is nothing holding anyone back from assuming that position within a short period of time.

In the Molecular Business no one in the company can relax in the easy chair of authority and be callous and indifferent to the needs of subordinates. All leaders will find that they will have to be concerned for those under them or they will be replaced by others who will be.

All job positions in the Molecular Business are offered first to those who want to apply for them. An appointment will only be made when there is no volunteer available.

Workers may want to transfer to different areas of the company. They should not be denied this choice. They are always free to apply for a transfer, and as long as there is an opening, and other groups can accept them by a majority vote, they will be allowed to make the move. If word has it that they are troublemakers and is not accepted into a new group then they will have to stay where they were initially.

In the standard business of today there is intelligence seeking its correct level, but there are many blocks to achievement. Once in a while, a high position is filled by a competent one, but the person probably had to spend most of one’s life getting there. Perhaps the employee could have done an even better job twenty years ago when he or she had more energy, but that energy was suppressed a great deal to please please superiors and move ahead.

Often competent, intelligent people encounter too many obstacles, too much resistance, and make too many people feel threatened. They often wind up breaking away and becoming an entrepreneur, forming some enterprise of their own, even if it means taking a high risk and living on a shoestring. Some of the most intelligent people demand freedom for themselves above financial security.

The Molecular Business supplies financial stability as well as freedom. We shall explain the financial aspect later, but from what we have discussed so far, we can see that freedom is a prime virtue of this order.

In the authoritarian business of today the employee does not have complete freedom of speech, as we mentioned earlier. The employee has to support the boss no matter how much in error is made. Those who speak up are always in danger of losing their jobs.

Not so in the Molecular Business. Here, it is the other way around. The manager is the servant and must try to please the employees. The employee has full power to speak one’s mind without fear of reprisal, for the manager does not have power to fire an employee without the support of the fellow workers.

This principle gives the workers of the world freedom of speech at last. And is it not logical that we should have freedom of speech in that area of life wherein we speak the most – our jobs?

To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.

“Search” site:freeread.com

To access all the chapters so far see the directory at the top middle next to the meme.

For videos explaining the Molecular Relationship go HERE:

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE

 

Chapter Thirty-Seven
Part Two: The Molecular Business
The Problem with Business as Usual

The Molecular Relationship is nature’s order and so it is a natural thing that all of humanity’s organizations will gravitate, in their evolutionary process, toward it.

The business world is no exception and is presently leading all other organized activity toward this natural system. The paramount principle of the Molecular Relationship is that it encourages initiation, and in today’s world there are more initiates being made in the business community than any other. Every entrepreneur is in the process of initiating something, or attempted initiation.

Still, there is a long way to go, even in the avant-garde business world. At present, business leaders sense the need of the Molecular Relationship and are feeling their way in the right general direction, but still lack the vision, and self-sacrifice necessary to see the whole picture.

The bottleneck for businesses all over the world is the same that bothers all other organizations to some degree: there is always a lack of freedom to initiate. Complete freedom to initiate is the great power that will bring in the New Age of peace and abundance that spiritual teachers have looked toward for thousands of years. It is that simple, but unfortunately, simplicity usually eludes us. If our eyes are caught on the illusion then we always see the complex. If our eyes see the real, we see the simplicity behind all things, no matter how diverse they may be.

Since the beginning of business history, the basic mode of operation has been the same: the one with the bucks has power to initiate a commercial endeavor. If those in charge have a degree of common sense they succeed and make the business profitable. In the process they hire a number of employees to assist. Because they are the initiators they have full life-and-death power over the various jobs, of which there is always a scarcity. Because of the scarcity of employment, the initiators (or “bosses” as we will call them) assume a positions of tremendous power over the lives of these subordinates. Any hint that they may be terminated fills them with foreboding fear and distress. Thus those in charge assume life-and-death power (concerning career) over their subjects, just as a king, or dictator, has life and death power over the subjects. The bosses, therefore, establish for themselves little kingdoms, and for eight to ten hours a day they rule with supreme authority. Only after the workday ends do the subjects regain their freedom to run their lives, hobbies or additional work as they see fit.

As a kingdom grows, so grows the bureaucracy of the king. Alone they cannot control (or govern) the lives of all their subjects, so they select others who agree with their philosophy and give them power to be governors, or overlords, over the lives of the people. The people have no voice in the selection of these overlords but are chosen completely by the decree of the king. Each overlord has the same power as the king over the subjects, but controls a smaller group. The overlords are subject to their various kings, just as the people are subject to them and they maintain their power as long as they please their kings (or bosses) and stay within the guidelines of their Eminence’s philosophy. Thus, the overlords are not free, for they are also subjects, but they do have the advantage of power of dominion.

Correspondingly, we can easily see that as a business grows, it becomes a microcosmic kingdom. The boss cannot control the whole enterprise so he selects a bureaucracy of overlords. These overlords (executives, vice presidents, supervisors, foremen) direct the working lives of the employees and have a similar power over their lives as the Number One Boss, except over a smaller number. The employees have no voice in the selection of these overlords but are chosen completely by the decree of the boss. The overlords are subject to the bosses just as the employees are subject to them, and they maintain their power as long as they please their bosses and stay within the guidelines of their Eminence’s philosophy. Thus, the managers are not free, for they are also subjects, but they also have the advantage of power of dominion just as overlords under a king.

This is an interesting correspondence, isn’t it? We think we are a free people, but when we stop to think of it, there are eight hours a day when most of us are not. We have a life-and-death subjection (career-wise) to a mini-dictator five or more days a week.

One may argue and say: “My boss is a nice guy and lets me have latitude in my job. He is not a dictator.” It may be true that he is a nice guy but the fact that he is a dictator is dependent on his power, not whether he is a nice guy. An individual may be a dictator or king and at the same time be a benevolent person, and the people will enjoy a large range of freedoms. This does not mean they are not ruled by a dictator. Just watch what happens if this benevolent person dies and is replaced by one with a lust-for-power. It then becomes obvious that the leader has absolute power.

Watch what happens in business when the nice boss is replaced by an authoritarian one who is not concerned with human rights. You will find that he or she does have power to dictate. You might also watch what happens when the boss who is a nice guy has his job threatened by his superior and then has his own wishes crossed by a subordinate. We will see that even the “nice guy” uses his dictatorial powers now and then, and perhaps unjustly.

For a leader to have the power of a king or dictator would be fine if we were all perfect men and women in meeting out justice, but since none of us are perfect, authoritarian power is always meted out with imperfection. Therefore, the only solution to the establishment of pure efficiency is the creation of a relationship which will limit authoritarian power to control our desire to initiate, yet at the same time give the leader power to lead and make decision.

The Molecular Business operates on similar principles as the Spiritual Molecule except that the numbers of individuals in the various molecules will not be determined in advance, but will be resolved as needed. Nevertheless, when a company finds certain number combinations that work, they should try and uniformly duplicate them as much as possible just as nature does with its molecules.

In any molecular structure that is created, we must remember that the number three is of prime importance. If we look through an electron microscope, for instance, we will see that the atoms form numerous associations in triangular relationships. This is because the Trinity is the foundation of all life. We observe this truth consistently throughout nature.

If we look at any successful organization or cause, we will also see the Trinity of energies at work. The political machinery of the United States is a good example. We have, as representing the First Ray, or Father Energy, the President, or the executive branch. Secondly, there is the Legislative branch representing the Third Ray of Intelligent Activity, or the Holy Ghost Energy. Finally, we have the Supreme Court, or the judicial branch, representing the Second Ray, or the Love-Wisdom, or the Christ Mediating Energy which mediates the laws for the benefit of the people.

The Founding Fathers probably had no knowledge that a Trinity was needed for creation; instead, they followed their intuition which guided them in that direction. What they did not realize was that if they did not follow this Trinity Principle, then the great creation that they wished to initiate would have never been given life and the old kingdom government would have reigned here in America.

This Trinity Principle can be seen today in any business or organization that will outlive its founder. First, there will exist the Chairman of the Board, or the President and advisors as representing the Father Energy. This group executes the laws. Next there will be the members of the Board of Directors or investors who recommend regulations or set the policies. These represent the Third Ray, or Intelligent Activity Energy. Finally, there will be the managers representing the Christ Mediating Energy, who carry out and interpret policy for the general workers.

Every successful business will have this Trinity of energies operating in it, but there is no black and white pattern that they all will follow. It may merely involve a father, mother and child depicting the Three, or it could involve three divisions of a giant corporation. The important point to remember is that there is power in the use of the three energies and all business should look for methods of using them.

There are three basic problems that cause inefficiency in a business that the Molecular Relationship will correct:

[1] Poor choice of management for key positions. Too often a business will turn into a microcosm of the government bureaucracy and incompetents will fill important positions and set up their little mini-dictatorships. People under them will be resentfully aware that they should be replaced. Instead, they find their hands are tied in influencing the structure of the organization. All power to hand out any position is controlled from the top down.

[2] Employees are not committed. This complaint is universal among business owners and managers. Employees only seem interested in putting in their time and taking home their pay. How can they be made more conscientious and have a greater sense of responsibility so performance and reliability will be enhanced?

[3] Inflexible wage scales. Every substantial business is committed to certain fixed employee salaries. This is fine when business is good, but, when business is slow, meeting these paydays hurts and can often spell doom to a company. Many businesses could have succeeded if there had been some employee flexibility regarding wages.

The business world has created these three problems because it is out of harmony with nature by being much too authoritarian. This has made individual responsibility impossible in many cases, and has created numerous mini-dictators who must be obeyed without question. All living things in nature enjoy a shared responsibility and cooperation rarely found in the business world of today.

What executives do not realize is that this cooperation and sense of responsibility will occur naturally in a business or organization if the black-and-white authoritarian process is replaced by one of shared responsibility.

Next, we will discuss how key positions in a company can be selected to harmonize with the natural flow of energy.

To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.

“Search” site:freeread.com

To access all the chapters so far see the directory at the top middle next to the meme.

For videos explaining the Molecular Relationship go HERE:

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

JJ’s Amazon page HERE