Gathering 2005 — Sun Valley, Part 32
The Molecular Relationship
JJ: We’re going to talk today about the Molecular Relationship. This is a principle that the group is probably more excited about that any other because of the potential that it has. Most of you are familiar with it. There is a handful that is not. So we’re going to kind of recap the whole principle and how it works and then go into maybe a few details and aspects we haven’t covered before, hopefully. Does anybody know what a molecule is?
Audience: “Well, it’s made up of more than one atom.”
JJ: Made up of more than one atom. Is a molecule just a couple of atoms getting together? What is it? What produces a molecule? Rob? We’re talking about physical matter.
Rob: “A bunch of atoms. It could either be the same atoms or different atoms and they have a bond that makes them something more than what they are in a single condition.”
JJ: Okay. Assaf?
Assaf: “They share electrons together. The different atoms in the molecule share together electrons in order to balance the missing electrons that each one has. An atom has extra electrons and another atom has missing electrons so they share them together.”
JJ: Okay, and they share for what reason did you say?
Assaf: “To become a new type of matter.”
JJ: Yeah, that’s the result, but you said a minute ago they share for what reason? What’s the impulse behind it? You just said the word.
Audience: “Balance.”
JJ: Balance, right. Who is of a scientific bent here? Anybody? So they share electrons and by several atoms getting together it balances off each individual atom. Isn’t that interesting? They share it for balance. In other words, one atom has too many electrons — it has an extra electron in its outer electron shell — another atom is missing an electron, and they share and they balance each other’s energies.
Do you think that the average person out there feels just a little bit out of balance? What do you think? (chuckling) Almost everybody you meet, once you get to know them, is a little out of balance, aren’t they? It’s kind of funny. They may look really balanced when you see them, like, oh, let’s pick on old James over here. He looks really balanced. He’s about the most balanced-looking guy you can find. (laughter) You never see him raise his voice or get angry or… I’ve never even seen him get frustrated.
Audience: (Inaudible protest & laughter.)
JJ: From what I know of James, James is just the perfect guy. But let’s get his spouse’s view on this. Is he perfectly balanced at all times?
Audience: “Yes, he is.”
Audience: Laughter.
JJ: Oh! We found one! Boy, you’re getting paid off tonight, huh? (laughter).
Audience: “I see a new car in your future. (laughter).”
JJ: A new house. (laughter) Well, we’ll just eliminate James from the equation. He doesn’t need any more balance. But everybody is a little bit out of balance. Once you get to know them, it’s amazing the problems each person has. Each person has what I call the maximum amount of problems they can handle, except for one person out seven which is on a Sabbath life. I believe that one life out of seven is a Sabbath for the person and he has a fairly easy life. And if you look around, that’s about the way it works out. About one person out of seven seems to have it pretty easy. The other six out of seven, if you talk to them, if they had one more thing to handle they would just break and probably be driven insane pretty much. (chuckles) But when you get to know the average person, they’ve got all they can handle, except for maybe Rob, right? You could handle more, right?
Rob: “Uhhh, no.” (laughter)
JJ: Not even Rob could handle more. So most of us have just about all that we can handle.
Audience: “So is that like one out every seven years you get a Sabbath life?”
JJ: No, seven lifetimes.
Audience: “So how often do they occur? (inaudible)”
JJ: Well, depends on how often you incarnate. Anyway, everything goes in cycles. Maybe one out of seven years you might have a little bit easier year than normal, too.
Audience: “One out of seven days.”
JJ: Yeah, one out of seven days we make a little bit easier day for ourselves. We kind of plan it that way so we can get refreshed. A physical molecule is created, then, by two or more atoms getting together and sharing their electrical energies.
All the energies in the universe are reduced to two things. What are the two energies in the universe?
Audience: “Positive and negative.”
JJ: Positive and negative. That’s all there is. That’s duality. Everything is created from duality. We have my computer over here. It’s got really complicated programs processing millions of bits of information, but the whole intelligence of the computer is reduced to what?
Audience: “Zero and one. Off and on.”
JJ: Right, two things. Positive and negative, zero and one. A binary system of zero/one produces everything that happens on that computer. A combination of two things — zero and one, positive and negative — makes a complicated computer work. Billions of zeros and ones in all kinds of different combinations make anything you want to happen be created on that computer.
Well, that’s the way God created the universe — zero and one, the same way a computer program is created. When you see these kids playing these video games with these complicated graphics, all that creation took place from two things being put together in all kinds of different combinations. So it’s the same thing with the reality we’re in. We’re almost like a computer program in the fact that when you go smaller and smaller, all you find are wavelengths produced of zero and one — top of the wavelength is positive, bottom of the wavelength is negative — and from this wavelength is produced all creation in the manifested universe.
So let’s start with the atom. There are many ingredients of creation below the atom. If we understood what was actually in the atom it would boggle the mind. And that’s the last part of my next book I’m working on. (Eternal Words) It’s going to explain that. It’s going to give you some very interesting things about that. But for the sake of today’s discussion, we’re going to start with the atom. The atom is composed of what two energized particles? What are they called?
Audience: “Protons and electrons.”
JJ: Protons and electrons. Then there’s a third particle that’s neutral. It’s neutral because it still has a positive and negative within it but it’s fairly balanced. Now when we find a particle in science where it says it’s neutral, it’s not really neutral. When science says something is neutral it means it’s very close to neutral. You have the positive and negative energies balancing each other out, but still there will be a slight imbalance, sometimes almost immeasurable. But there will still be a slight out-of-balance for that particle.
Now for the protons and electrons, they have a full charge of plus one and minus one, and they are way out of balance, so they have to be together. They are drawn together magnetically with a very powerful force where the -1 meets the +1 and they completely cancel each other out, and this causes the electron to stay around its central nucleus. The basic element of creation is the hydrogen atom. It has one electron circulating around a nucleus. The most complicated in nature is the uranium atom, which has 93 protons in the middle and 93 electrons circling around. So you can imagine the balance there becoming more difficult. It’s a very complicated atom. As a matter of fact, as we get to the heavy elements — the latest creations and the most complex — they are so complicated that they sometimes split apart. That’s called the splitting of the atom, and that’s what makes the atomic bomb.
As the atom reaches the end of its evolution– it has seven electron shells, it fills up these various layers, and the last layer, the seventh, the element of radium is created. Now what’s interesting about radium that’s different from the other lower elements?
Audience: “It glows.”
JJ: It glows in the dark.
We paint the dials of our watches with radium and they glow in the dark. It’s filling up its seventh electron layer. Now, isn’t it interesting that there are seven layers of electrons. What do you think that corresponds to?
Audience: “Seven centers.”
JJ: Right, seven centers in the human being. Now, what do you think the electrons that circle around the atom correspond to in the human being? Most of the mass in the atom is concentrated in the center. There’s only about 1/2000 of the mass circulating around. Almost all the mass is in the center. Now, with our bodies, where is most of the mass located? All the mass except just a very ephemeral mass?
Audience: “In the physical.”
JJ: Right. Your physical body is like the center of the human atom. That’s where almost all of our mass is, but not all of our mass. Where’s the rest of the mass?
Audience: “Aura.”
JJ: Right. The rest of it is in our aura. The aura is like the electrons, and it’s such a small amount of mass that we can’t even see it with our normal vision. As a matter of fact, when the scientists are examining the atom, they’re having a really hard time seeing the electrons. In other words, at one time they think it’s a particle, another time they think it’s a wave. They used to think it was a particle for sure; now it displays wave characteristics. They can’t figure out what it is for sure. They just know it exists and it has a different charge.
It’s a little bit like scientists looking at our aura or taking Kirlian photography, which doesn’t really take pictures of the aura, it gets part of our energy field. But all of our energy fields that are non-physical are kind of hard to see, and scientists can’t figure out if they’re made of matter or waves or what. I mean, the correspondence is very interesting. What’s the Law of Correspondences, Curtis?
Curtis: “As it is within, so it is without. As it is above, so it is below. So you can look at what’s going on, on the inside, the inner worlds, the microcosm, and it corresponds to what will happen at a macrocosm.”
JJ: Yeah. Very good. But there’s a twist. As below, so it is above, but it’s always with a twist. The scientists that examined these little atoms when they first discovered how they were made, they thought, “Boy, this is just like the solar system. I wonder if atoms are miniature solar systems.” That’s what scientists really wondered, because it seemed to correspond so well. But as they did more and more experiments on them, they found out, “Well, it’s not exactly like a solar system. Similar, but not exactly.” But this is the way the Law of Correspondences works. You cannot look at what’s below and find exactly what it is and say, “Now we know exactly what the above is.” That can’t be done. So how is information when we look below usable to what is above? How is it usable? Larry? Something told me Larry wanted to answer.
Larry: “What was the question again?”
(Audience laughter.)
JJ: Larry, you’re making me look bad here — (audience laughter).
Audience: “He’s serious.”
JJ: (Laughs) I can’t remember the question either — (audience laughter).
Audience: “He said it’s not an exact correspondence, so how can you use the whole principle of ‘as above, so below’?”
Larry: “Well, I suppose it is a principle, it’s not the facts of the actual implementation of the principle but the principle itself.”
JJ: Yeah. Okay. Principles are always to be used by using the intuition. Unless a person develops his intuition somewhat, he cannot use principles or even understand them thoroughly. I’ve explained principles to a lot of just ordinary people and they just can’t seem to grasp what it is. They think they understand, but then when you get feedback from them, they don’t really understand what a principle is. Because a principle is always a key — a key to understanding. “As above, so below” is a principle. The Law of Correspondences is a principle, and it unlocks the doors. So we can study what the atom is like and then we can figure out a lot of what the solar system is like because they correspond, but not exactly. Why do they not correspond exactly? Why is that?
Audience: (Inaudible) “Perfection of the developmental stages. Because the smaller it is, the more chance it has had to evolve and become more stable, and the larger it is, it’s still in the process of becoming.”
JJ: That’s very true. And there’s another thing. Suppose that you’re a god and you’re progressing from one level to another. Now, you’ve already perfected a creation on a lower level, and now you’re doing it on a higher level. Is doing exactly the same thing over again all you want to do? Or would you want to add maybe some extra complexities in there? It’s like when these kids play video games, they master the first level, then they go on to the second level. The second level actually corresponds to the first level, but then as they’re playing the second level, some extra bad guys are thrown in or something like that and it’s harder. They think, “Oh, this is harder,” and it takes while longer, but they like that. They don’t want the first level repeated.
Then they go to the second level, the third level, the fourth level, and each level of these video games gets tougher. They don’t want to go through the third level, fourth level repeated over and over. They like the idea that unexpected twists are added in. The next level is speeded up, things get more difficult, it gets harder and harder and harder… and they like it. And if it didn’t get harder and harder and harder, what would happen to the video game industry? The kids would quit playing. They like the idea that it gets more difficult. You and I are created in the image of God, and when we study ourselves, it tells us about the mind of God. So if we like different levels, what do you think God likes? You think he wants different levels, too? Yeah.
Audience: “A principle is sort of like a blueprint for facts. You have the concept of a table, but there are all sorts of implementations of the table. And if God came up with a principle, wouldn’t he want to implement it in all the possible ways that it could be implemented, below and above?”
JJ: Right. Well, that’s kind of what they do with the video game, too. They get a basic plot behind the video game — Star Wars or whatever they’re making the video game around — and they have basic elements included in there. Then they take these basic elements and start making the game simple so that even somebody like James over here can play it. (laughs) Actually, if I want something complicated explained, I go to James.
So it starts out simple and it gets more complex. This is the way that progression works in our system. Now, God Himself is like us. We are like God, and God is like us. God likes these different levels. And the different levels of God’s video game are found in His creations. If we could go below the threshold of the atom and find out everything that’s working down there, we’ll find that it goes from the complex to the simple. God started creation on a first level, so to speak, first level of difficulty, and then He introduced a second level. The level that we’re up to now is level seven, because everything is composed of seven rays — seven colors in the rainbow, seven notes on the musical scale. The whole universe is structured, from the atom to man, on the principle of the number seven.
We are on level seven, and we’re going to stay there till the end of this universe. It won’t be till an entirely new universal creation is created that we’ll go to level eight. But that will be so far ahead it boggles the mind to think about it – the end of our time, so to speak. When the end of our time is reached, then we will go to level eight. But right now, we’ve got all we can handle with level seven. Level seven started with the atom with seven electron layers. That’s where level seven began, and it will end with the end of our creation, where the number seven will be perfected. What God is doing with the number seven is putting it together in every possible combination. Every possible level of difficulty is to be surpassed and surmounted and mastered in this universe using the number seven. I mean, just looking at the number two, look how complicated you can make a computer. But imagine making a foundation on the number seven for a creation. That makes the level of difficulty in this universe quite complex.
Theories should be as simple as possible, but not simpler. Albert Einstein (1879 – 1955)
Jan 6, 2010
To search the website, containing millions of words, replace the word “search” with the word or phrase you want to find and place the entire line in the Google search box.
“Search” site:freeread.com
Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE
Easy Access to All the Writings
For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE
JJ’s Amazon page HERE