Oneness Through the Soul
Let us suppose we are proceeding with the creation of a molecule and have a group of 24+ members who are attempting to harmonize for group soul contact. Everything seems to be going well until I give a class which reveals some new information. Most of the members accept it well but four of them have serious doubts. Two of them remain as supportive as they can and say they’ll just put this teaching on the shelf and move forward the best they can. The other two seem quite upset are very vocal. They say their soul contact tells then that I am dead wrong and we need to not include this in the group teachings.
Question: How should this situation be handled? Can a molecule be created with these four involved?
Situation Two: Everything seems agreeable on the direction of the group and the teachings. Then Bob and Alice come to me in private and share a grievance, but they do not think it is a grievance. They are upset that three members of the group are slackers and not doing their share. They tell me I should do something about it. They are also upset at two other members because they are not supportive enough. They think that most of the members of the group need a lot of work and question the motives of some.
How should we deal with Bob and Alice?
Situation One. We realize that we must be united by seeing as one through the eyes of the soul if we are going to touch the higher spiritual energies and be linked with spiritual molecules. We therefore meet together to seek oneness, not a oneness imposed by an authority, but a oneness through contacting the Source of truth.
We first seek to meditate as one together while seeking higher contact. When we reach a high state, we then review the necessity of reaching oneness if we are to move any further as well as the importance of keeping our feelings positive while we discuss differences. Then the leader asks the four who disagreed to voice their opinions and reasoning behind their disagreement. I ask the group to tune into their souls as each person speaks to register whether or not truth is spoken.
The four each speak. Afterwards the members are asked to express what they received from their souls as they heard the words.
The leader then speaks and gives what he believes to be the truth of the matter. Then the time is turned over to members of the group to give their soul impressions of his words. All but the four felt their soul contact verified his words.
The leader then asks for a group prayer to petition for one answer for us all. We ask and we wait in silence for five to ten minutes for confirmation.
We arise and several commented on the powerful confirmation they received. We ask the four what they received. The two who said they would put things on the shelf said they received confirmation and were ready to move ahead with the group. One of the remaining two said he wasn’t sure. The final one gave us a lecture. He said he was his own man and an independent thinker and the rest of us were being brain washed. He said he still believed in the molecule and wanted to stay in it but we should make space for different opinions – that everyone thinking the same was not natural.
Question: How should we handle this guy? What should we do next?
Situation Two; The leader tells Bob and Alice that their problems with the group need to be discussed with the group in our next meeting.
They reply that they did not want to cause a disturbance and that is why they came to me privately.
The leader tells them that their grievance has already caused a disturbance in the spiritual flow, and to restore it the problem needs to be resolved with group effort.
They insist they do not want their feelings made public to the group.
How should this situation be handled?
We realize that we must be united by seeing as one through the eyes of the soul if we are going to touch the higher spiritual energies and be linked with spiritual molecules. We therefore meet together to seek oneness, not a oneness imposed by an authority, but a oneness through contacting the Source of truth.
We first seek to meditate as one together while seeking higher contact. When we reach a high state the leader explains the necessity of reaching oneness if we are to move any further. He explains the importance of keeping our feelings positive while we discuss differences. We then ask the four who disagreed to voice their opinions and reasoning behind their disagreement. The group is asked to tune into their souls as each person speaks to register whether or not truth is spoken.
The four each speak. Afterwards we ask the members to express what they received from their souls as they heard the words.
The Beast or Not?
Situation One:
Through group soul contact we were able to incorporate three of the four who disagreed back into the group. The leader explains to the group that the principle taught was an important one for the group. If there was a difference of opinion over where to have the next gathering or what topic we would discuss next that wouldn’t matter much unless hurt feelings were involved. But there are some things where oneness is necessary or group soul contact will not be possible.
The then explain that we will have to release this one dissenter from the molecule and invite someone else to take his place. He will still be welcome in the general group and he is welcome to attempt to organize a molecule of his own if he thinks his beliefs are superior.
The guy is pretty upset and accuses us of being just one more arm of the beast. “This is what the beast does, even according to your own teachings,” he said. “He demands everyone think the same or there will be hell to pay.”
The guy leaves in a very angry state and we are all concerned that he may turn into an enemy, or, at best, never fellowship with us again.
Question: Does the guy have a point? Did we turn into the beast? If not what is the difference between us and the beast?
Situation Two
Bob and Alice do not want to work through their negative feelings with the group. The leader tells them that the prime directive of the group is soul contact and if they are interfering with that then they will not be able to participate until feelings are resolved.
The leader gives them a choice; present their feelings honestly to the group and work through them or we will substitute someone else in their places until they decide to move ahead.
They were very agitated, but finally decided to present their feelings to the group.
When this occurred, there was some offense taken by various members but we kept the dialog going until there was harmony. It seemed that part of the problem was just a few minor misunderstandings and lack of communication.
The meeting ended with lots of hugs and a sweet spirit.
Question: Was the leader right in pressuring them to communicate with the group? Why or why not?
One-fifth of the people are against everything all the time. – Robert F Kennedy
Oct 9, 2011
Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE
Easy Access to All the Writings
For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE