Soul-to-Soul Communication
The true principle of communication functions from the mind and bypasses the astral plane. It is from soul to soul which causes the two to understand each other, which leads to ironing out differences and seeing eye to eye.
Have you noticed that when you get in arguments that often it seems the other person doesn’t agree with you because he doesn’t understand what you are saying? I know this happens to me often and it is difficult indeed to reach agreement when the other guy seems not only to misunderstand your point, but is unwilling to understand.
When this happened, you wind up spending little time working out the differences and instead attempting to clarify while the other guy argues against illusion, often things you do not think or believe.
The trouble with our language is it is not perfect and those who interpret in black and white, or according to their own illusion, will often understand in error.
The way to correct this is through soul-to-soul communication. The truism that is used by the masses that best describes this is “reading between the lines.” When one does this he will often see accurately what is being said beyond what is revealed in the black and white words.
For instance, a guy may say something he thinks is irreverent but fun humor. The black and white person may see only the words and be insulted. Another may read between the lines and see some good-natured humor, or at least the intent.
Real soul to soul communication goes beyond reading between the lines and allows the couple to understand things in the other’s consciousness that has not been spoken at all.
If two people with soul-to-soul communication disagree on a point then they are able to go back and forth with understanding, and in a friendly way, until they clearly understand where the other is coming from.
The dark brothers cannot flourish where there is soul to soul communication so they do everything possible to discourage it and twist words of light so they appear to be words of darkness. The distortion mostly occurs on the emotional/astral plane where negative feelings turn truth on its head and causes a reverse seeing rather than actual.
The mental plane is also a problem for many have illusionary foundation beliefs that causes great distortion through life.
The trick for the disciple is to seek out his illusionary beliefs and dispel them and then raise his consciousness to the spiritual planes so he can see correctly.
The first step to be taken to create true communication is to sincerely desire to understand what the other person is communicating and sincerely try to accurately communicate with him. Sincerity or a pure heart is always a good first step.
A reader wants me to explain more clearly the reversal effect of the astral plane and how it works.
First let me emphasize that there are three worlds of form composed of three different types of matter.
The first is the dense physical and this is composed if two basic layers of matter. [1] Physical matter, as science understands the term, and [2] Etheric matter – a finer grade of physical matter that coexists with us.
The next world of form is the astral. Here the matter is composed of finer particles that are manipulated by emotional energy. It is as if this matter and the emotions are one.
The highest world of form is the mental. The particles here are finer still and are governed by mind, thought and mental energy.
Reality in the physical plane is fairly stable and is governed by law. The earth circles around the sun, water is always wet, gravity always pulls us toward the earth etc. The same goes for the mental plane. 2+2 always equals 4, truth is always true, and logic does not contradict itself.
This consistency does not exist on the astral/emotional plane. 2+2 can equal 6 if you feel that is correct. Truth seems to change daily and two things can contradict and still be true if you feel that is right and correct.
For the astral centered person meanings can change from one day to the next. He may think he loves another one day and understands what this is, and the next day he may hate the person and have a totally different view of love and hate.
He attacks not by logic but by emotional tactics. If he is arguing for global warming he will gloss over the facts and attempt to humiliate the opponent by calling him a flat earther, climate change denier or just plain stupid.
He has strong appeal to authority rather than stable facts. Concerning global warming again he will appeal to the false idea that “all scientists agree with me and you are anti science if you do not accept.” The main emphasis of the person on the mental plane will be logic, principles and data.
The problem with emotions is that they change regularly in the astral person. When the astral person is at peace, he will see things much differently than when he is angry. Many of his decisions are made by impulse, governed by how he feels at the moment.
It turns out that truth perceived through the eyes of emotion is often upside down to the real truth. A stopped watch though is accurate twice a day and similarly there are times when emotional feelings lead to the right decision, but if totally relied on they more often than not either lead to dead ends or disaster.
Fortunately, most of us have some mental energy in circulation but the vast majority have much more astral than mental or spiritual.
Everything is changing. People are taking their comedians seriously and the politicians as a joke. – Will Rogers
June 28, 2013
Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE
JJ’s Amazon page HERE
> He attacks not by logic but by emotional tactics. If he is arguing for global warming he will gloss over the facts and attempt to humiliate the opponent by calling him a flat earther, climate change denier or just plain stupid.
This is what you do. You use your claimed communion with higher spiritual realms to frame yourself as having greater understanding than those who don’t accept your dogma. You use terms like “materialist” in the same manner that this hypothetical uses “flat earther,” to humiliate your opponent by framing them as having inferior understanding. You did this not long ago with this comment:
> The materialist cannot understand that which he’d does not even recognize existing. For instance a flat earther will not understand anything about the Kuiper Belt because he thinks is is a fantasy. On the other hand the spiritual believer recognizes the existence of the material and can understand it.
It cannot possibly get any clearer. Word-for-word, you reproduced the illogical emotional tactics you described, almost exactly.
—
> He has strong appeal to authority rather than stable facts. Concerning global warming again he will appeal to the false idea that “all scientists agree with me and you are anti science if you do not accept.”
You do this too. Whenever I pressure you to show any stable fact about your contact with higher spiritual realms, you appeal to your measly handful of followers instead. Everyone else just gets labeled as a materialist who lacks your higher spiritual understanding. There is no stable fact, just the common narrative that you and your group appeal to that just circles back in on itself.
You make no sense at all and have no case that I argue from an emotional viewpoint. I always use reason. It is true that many like yourself only argue from a materialist viewpoint with no recognition of the spiritual. That’s just the way it is and it is a fact that someone who accepts the spiritual has to deal with.
I made my case simply by quoting your own words. If your words don’t make any sense to you, that’s your problem. Falling back on this usual infantile dodging routine you do, where you plug your ears about it and repeat these impotent affirmations about yourself, doesn’t reflect well on you at all.
As for my spirituality, there is no problem here. I can engage spiritual matters with other people just fine. You’re the exception because, regardless of what is real or not, you have no communion with anything that could be called spiritual. Your ability to ramble endlessly about New Age mumbo-jumbo does not put you in communion with anything spiritual, not even remotely.
You do not use my words against me, but instead use your warped interpretation of my words. For instance you say:
“You use terms like “materialist” in the same manner that this hypothetical uses “flat earther,” to humiliate your opponent by framing them as having inferior understanding.”
Totally wrong. I do not use the word materialist to humiliate, but to merely differentiate and point out that “cannot understand that which he’does not even recognize existing.”
Since you do not recognize many of the things I talk about as even existing then any dialog between us is quite unproductive.
Regardless of your intentions or what you believe your intentions to be, the result is the same. You invent a fictional hierarchy that establishes yourself as a superior with no grounding in any stable fact or truth.