After Image

2000-5-5 02:46:00

Rob and Mark, where do you get the idea that I am not talking about an after-image? Let me quote from my article. "Your eyes will have taken a photograph of his etheric light and you will see the "after image" of his head glowing before you."

A photograph is indeed an after-image, just as in the examples Rob cited. If a flash goes off in your face or you catch a glimpse of the sun, you will see an after-image in the same way. If you move your eyes the after-image will move. If you stare ahead the after-image will appear to float. This is indeed what I am talking about so we are in harmony here, not in disagreement.

My point is that the after-image is of more than the physical body if you do the exercise right. If you look at something that is a mere negative or non-living you will see the same after image each time, but if you look at a human you will see different after-images of the etheric body at different times.

I have looked at two different people with the same complexion and saw two very different after images of the etheric. One was all light with no shadows and the other had large dark blotches. Usually when I ask someone with dark blotches if they are feeling OK they will answer that they have a cold or feeling ill or depressed.

I have also looked at my etheric and aura many times through the same mirror in the same conditions and lighting, and saw many diverse effects. On the other hand, I have an image of a negative of a woman and every time I stare at that I see exactly the same results - such is not the case with a living human being.

For those of you who are doubters, I would suggest you actually try the exercises. Do the one with the thumbs and you will actually see the image of the etheric. When you see it you will know you are seeing more than just your physical body. If more than your dense physical is there and it is visible - does it not make sense that it would leave an after-image?