The Name of Jesus Christ

1999-12-4 11:44:00

Sterling asks an interesting question:

"I'm sure you have addressed this question elsewhere, so I apologize for broaching it before completing book II or reading through all your archive posts. Perhaps someone can direct me to where this has been discussed previously.

"A friend just now broached this question of me, so I am passing it on as I believe it to be a great one.

"I've not yet finished reading book II (I'm loving it so far), but so far you have not made any reference to what might be termed the "atonement of Jesus Christ," meaning what took place in the garden of Gethsemane when the Savior took upon himself the sins of the world, and then on the cross of Calvary which was subsequently overcome when the Redeemer rose triumphant from the tomb.

"The question, therefore, is what your take is on these things. How do they fit into the grand scheme of things?

"In my experience, they are the bottom line of what demarcates Christianity (and Mormonism). I find that the New Age ignores and redefines these facets so that they no longer resemble Biblical teaching. They turn Christ into their own Messiah, fashioned after their own liking. [Editors note: he appears to be quoting JJ] 'This power continued with them until the betrayal of Judas. This withdrawal of energy caused the number of completed Units to drop from twelve to eleven. Any chemist will verify that a standard Molecule must maintain its proper number or it will lose its properties. This is what happened to the twelve... they lost their higher properties. From the time of the betrayal by Judas to the addition of the twelfth apostle, Matthias, the apostles were frightened, ordinary men with no power above the ordinary human.'" (End of question)

JJ
This is an important question Sterling, for the belief or non-belief in the Atonement of Christ, as well as the scriptures in general, has created a great chasm between those of New Age leanings and scriptural faith.

It is interesting to watch a debate between a new ager and a born againer. The born againer will quote scripture after scripture to back up his beliefs and the new ager will smile as if the guy is from the stone ages and preach back his philosophy quoting no authority, but his heart. Consequently, the two are not speaking each other's language and both go away from the discussion feeling that the other is as far down the enlightenment scale as you can get.

One of the problems is that the sincere religious person has felt soul contact while reading the scriptures and, because of this, is not about to drop his belief in the closest link he has to the Spirit. On the other hand, many new agers have not even read the scriptures, or had them forced upon them while they were young, and do not identify with this feeling. Instead, many of them have received some spiritual contact while reading other books that teach enough truth to draw the inner voice.

What the true seeker must realize is that God has spoken to many different people in many different ways and, even though the vocabulary and definitions may vary, the core truths are the same.

The Book of Mormon expresses this quite well:
7 Know ye not that there are more nations than one? Know ye not that I, the Lord your God, have created all men, and that I remember those who are upon the isles of the sea; and that I rule in the heavens above and in the earth beneath; and I bring forth my word unto the children of men, yea, even upon all the nations of the earth?...

9. And because that I have spoken one word ye need not suppose that I cannot speak another; for my work is not yet finished; neither shall it be until the end of man, neither from that time henceforth and forever.

10 Wherefore, because that ye have a Bible ye need not suppose that it contains all my words; neither need ye suppose that I have not caused more to be written.

11 For I command all men, both in the east and in the west, and in the north, and in the south, and in the islands of the sea, that they shall write the words which I speak unto them; for out of the books which shall be written I will judge the world, every man according to their works, according to that which is written.

12 For behold, I shall speak unto the Jews and they shall write it; and I shall also speak unto the Nephites and they shall write it; and I shall also speak unto the other tribes of the house of Israel, which I have led away, and they shall write it; and I shall also speak unto all nations of the earth and they shall write it.
II Nephi 29:7; 9-12

Now here is an interesting question for the Mormons who, of course, accept the above words from the Book of Mormon. God here says he will "also speak to all nations of the earth and they shall write it." General Christianity believe that God spoke to prophets of one nation, and a past nation at that - ancient Palestine. The Mormons go a step further and they have scriptures from basically two nations past - America and Palestine. On the other hand, the Book of Mormon teaches that God will speak to "all nations." All nations are definitely more than two.

Where are these scriptures from the other nations? The answer is quite simple. Every people of every nation have sacred writings containing truths geared for the "salvation" of the people to whom they were given. These writings can range from the sacred teachings of the Hopi Indians to the Koran of Islam, to the Bhagavad-Gita, to the ancient Vedas to the writings of Confucius, to the sayings of Buddha to name a few.

Notice what God says about these words of his to all nations:
"I will judge the world, every man according to their works, according to that which is written." Those people who do not have the Christian scriptures, but have other words of God, will be judged by those words that are accepted by their own peoples.

Now we get to the synthesizing point. The Christian will say: "Those other books you call scriptures may be good, but they do not speak of Jesus Christ who is essential for salvation." To this we answer: "Ah, but they do my friend..."

To this the astounded believer will ask: "Where?"

Remember what we have said about the belief of the ancients regarding names? Today when we hear a name we just hear the sound, but when the ancients spoke a name they heard the meaning. If you called an Indian, Running Bear, you were acknowledging that he could run with the strength of a bear. Among the Hebrews if you were called David it meant that you were a person with a good heart easy to love.

So what does it mean to be called Jesus Christ? As we stated before this name means "anointed to deliver." Jesus did not intend to keep the name just for himself, but advised all of his followers to take the name upon them. All enlightened Souls are anointed to deliver those of a lower vibration. When we have been lifted up by someone above us, then it is our mission to lift or deliver others to higher ground also.

There is a universal rule which tells us that we cannot go higher until we have given out what we have learned and assisted in lifting our brethren to where we are. When we have done this, then another will come along and lift us to higher ground. This is the principle behind the name of Jesus Christ. To believe on His name is to believe on this principle, that there are higher lives in the Universe waiting to help deliver, or "save" us when we are ready.

This salvation is a mutual effort of the student and teacher. The teacher does not actually do the saving, but provides the tools, example and the knowledge to the student. The student then has the choice to use those tools to take the next step or to stay where he is for a while longer. If he takes the next step he is "saved" from his past moves into a bold new future.

Now let us get back to our question: Where in these other inspired works is the mention of the name of Jesus Christ?

Answer: You do not look for the sound "Jesus Christ." If you were transported back 2000 years ago to ancient Palestine and asked for Jesus Christ even the apostles would not recognize the sound. The name then was pronounced something like Yaysoos Christos. What you look for in the ancient writings is the meaning behind the name and you will find that the concept of the higher lending a helping hand, to the lesser evolved or less fortunate, is a principle taught in all sacred text and where this is taught the name of Jesus Christ stirs within the souls of men.

Those with greater knowledge and power lending a helping hand to those with less knowledge and power is the principle behind the name of Jesus Christ and is the principle of eternal salvation. (Joseph Smith called it Eternal Progression.) One must pass along the knowledge that he receives before he will be given more. If you keep it welled up within you, or "hide your talent buried in the earth", you will be damned. In other words, if you do not give out the light you have, your channels of reception will be dammed up until cut off from the spiritual flow.

Christ was the greatest teacher and example of helping his brethren, and being "anointed to deliver"; but it is the principle we must look to and not the man.

This is why, when a man called Him good, He replied:
"Why callest thou me good? There is none good but one, that is, God." Matt 19:17

He understood the principle in the scripture that teaches that one is cursed that trusts in the arm of flesh. (Jeremiah 17:5) Even trusting in the visible Jesus is thus trusting in the arm of flesh. Instead we must trust in the invisible Spirit and the teachings manifested through it.

Therefore, when we take upon ourselves the name of Jesus Christ, we commit to receive from sources verified by the spirit and then to send those teachings out for the benefit of all who are willing to receive.

Tomorrow we shall discuss Part II of this answer and cover the Atonement.

In the meantime perhaps some of you would like to post your views on the question:

What is the atonement?

It is said that the meaning of the word is At-One-Moment. What is the significance of this phrase?