Party Answers

2009-10-11 23:20:00

I was reminded by a reader that I hadn't commented yet on the following:

As we know there are two lines of political thinking that manifest in every country and every time frame. These two divisions are given the names liberal and/or conservative, left and/or right, progressive and/or traditional, etc.

Answer these questions:

(Note: Keep in mind both liberals and conservatives are not 100% on either side.)

Name three positive qualities of both the Left and the Right.

The Left:

Creative.
Emotional empathy.
Idealistic.

The Right:

Logical.
Sense of morality.
Business sense.

Name three negative qualities of each.

The Left:

Impulsive.
Emotional feelings plays big influence in decisions.
Authoritarian.

The Right:

Resists change.
Lacks empathy.
Lacks creativity.

Name three problems they both share.

They do not understand each other.
Both misuse power.
Neither put the people first.

Which side does best during war and distress and which during peace and plenty? What's the reason for this?

The Right, being centered in mind, usually have the most common sense approach in times of war or distress. In times of peace and plenty the Left can use their creative nature to benefit society.

We go through cycles of dominance from each side. Which side is dominating now and by how much? When will the cycle change?

Both sides always think the other is dominating. One has to be dispassionate to see the real position.

We've been in a fairly left of center cycle for about 100 years. Within this cycle are smaller cycles of influence from the Right. We are approaching a time that the mental faculties from the Right will dominate but first we must pass through this time of emotional domination so the power of mind can demonstrate its correct place of power. This should assert itself over the next couple decades.

On another note, I have a couple tidbits of information the group should find useful.

I believe two of Hitler's past lives in recent times was Napoleon Bonaparte and before that Charles XII of Sweden. One thing of interest is all three of these entities suffered from overwhelmingly cold winters in attacking Russia.

I think I've finally solved the mystery as to how Jesus could have been Apollonius, as DK [Djwhal Khul] states, who was born about the same time.

The entity Jesus did not completely die on the cross, but was healed and afterwards felt he needed a new identity so he could work without so much interference. He then assumed the identity of Apollonius and worked in his healed body until about 100 years of age. The real Apollonius probably died or left the scene around the age of 40. Apollonius performed many of the same miracles that Jesus did, plus a few extra.