A Kingdom Divided, Part 2

2007-2-28 04:04:00

We all have a number of different opinions and few tow the party line 100 percent in either the conservative or liberal arena. Because of this many fail to see the line that divides the various political houses [kingdoms].

Part of the problem is that words blur perception. For instance, you can ask the people on both sides of an issue a question like:

Are you in favor of personal freedom?

Every person to a man will proudly proclaim:  "Definitely! Freedom is what it is all about. I'd support it to my last breath."

Then if you change the subject to politics it will only be minutes before half the group will give themselves away and talk of their support for measures which may give them what they want, but will take away the freedom of the majority. If such people were honest they would rephrase their answer to something like this:

"Yes, I believe in freedom for myself, even if it comes at the expense of freedom for others."

The most popular form of this freedom for self comes through the support of unessential tax and spend policies. If we increase taxes for what we want then we force the money out of someone else's hands. This gives the person who supports the taxation more freedom at the expense of another just as the slaveholder had more freedom at the expense of the slave.

Generally when one sees a strong political division where one side is bitterly attacking another this issue of freedom lies somewhere under the surface creating the house [kingdom] divided. When the issue is not seen clearly and the lines are blurred then the house [kingdom] can hold together. But when the fog lifts and the issue is clearly seen then civil war begins in earnest and a victory must be obtained by one side or the other.

One interesting place to apply the principle of the House [Kingdom] Divided is in the understanding of the conspiracy theories. They have been around forever, but never so prevalent as today. I remember back in the Sixties there were only a handful of people that seemed to be aware of the great hidden conspiracy to bring in a New World Order. I must admit that I felt a little special for being in on the inside knowledge myself.

Presently the tables are turned. The conspiracy believer is no longer an oddity. Now it seems that the person who doesn't believe in a conspiracy under every rock is the contrarian. In fact, the conspiracy people are so prevalent that if there is a conspiracy to control the world it's quite possible that they are sheep that are used by the true manipulators.

As I have said before, there is a conspiracy to control the world and to take away the free will of mankind, but the headquarters are not centered here in the physical world. The Apostle Paul saw correctly when he stated:

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. (Ephesians 6:12)

The conspiracy people think they need to wrestle against flesh and blood. They point fingers at Bush, Clinton, the CFR, The Illuminati, the Masons, the Jews, Mormons or others.

The real conspirators are shape shifters and move their focus from body to body. Right after the move takes place few can see the new focus of evil. When Hitler gained a foothold of power few were concerned or saw any threat. Then even before he was defeated the true conspirators moved their focus and the world continued to see Nazism as the main threat when the foundations of the Soviet Empire were being laid. Then when this empire fell few saw the next shift.

The true spiritual wickedness in high places will continue to have power, even if their center of focus falls a hundred times, as long as people do not think for themselves and fail to perceive what should be obvious.

Even though the focus of evil will be in a particular group or movement the branches will stretch forth and touch every family in the civilized world. One can look at the various divisions we see about us and use this principle to identify which side would be supported by spiritual wickedness and which by the Brotherhood of Light. A key to finding the dark side is a characteristic of the adversary given in the Book of Revelations. It tells us that Satan is "the accuser of the brethren."

While it is true that there is a time and place for all things, even accusations, it is my observation that those on the side of illusion make many more accusations, including many that are baseless, than the pure in heart. Many not only accuse, but do so with much hatred and vitriolic emotion.

The next step is to make a list of the two sides of the various divisions. In doing this we need to ask:

  1. Which side represents the greater freedom for the individual and the whole?
  2. Which side makes the most unjust accusations and has the lowest tolerance for the expression of the opposing point of view?

Assignment:

Name some of the divisions that exist within our society and explain which side you suppose is supported by the Dark Brothers?

  

Global Warming Enlightenment

"One of the Thomas team's "moderate" scenarios was an increase in Earth's temperature of 0.8 degrees Celsius in the next fifty years. The researchers said this would cause the extinction of roughly 20 percent of the world's wild species, perhaps one million of them.

"Fortunately, this prediction can easily be checked. The Earth's temperature has already increased at least 0.6 degrees Celsius over the past 150 years. How many species died out because of that temperature increase?

"The answer? None.

"The Thomas paper tells us in its opening sentence:  "Climate change over the past 30 years has produced numerous shifts in the distributions and abundances of species, and has been implicated in one species-level extinction."

"That's right. The scientists who are predicting that 0.8 degrees Celsius of warming would cause hundreds of thousands of wildlife species extinctions over the next 50 years concede that roughly this level of temperature increase over the past 150 years has resulted in the extinction of one species. Reality takes away even that one extinction claim."

"Unstoppable Global Warming, Every 1,500 Years"
By  Fred Singer and Dennis T. Avery,
Page 78