Re: Demolition

2005-12-9 17:52:00

Susan quotes me:

"Now compare the attempted demolition of this building with the Twin Towers and ask yourself: Could a secret conspiracy really be confident of bringing down the two largest buildings in the world with explosives, something that has never been done before, when something easy like the building in the web reference was bungled?"

Because one company screws up a demolition what does that prove? Their incompetence.

Take a look at these world record demolitions (some with video) and tell me again that two large buildings could not be taken down with precision. (I have no clue who/what took down WTC but the referenced website JJ gave us is no evidence against the possibility IMO)

I haven't seen any demolition that reproduces the effect that I have seen with the twin towers where the demotion begins at the top.

My point with that sample was that if a company cannot be assured of pulling of a demolition with a medium sized building then the probability of something going wrong would be even greater with the largest buildings in the world for which there is no precedent.

If I was a conspirator I would stick to what I know I can get away with - not some project that has never been done before.

This is why simple assassinations are the most common tool of true conspirators for this has been done many times before and they know what they can and cannot get away with.