Evolution 101

2005-7-22 16:09:00

Rob writes:

First, you say the cyclops form is an advanced vehicle for advanced beings. In the present some fetuses develop with only one eye. Is there any relation? Are these fetuses attempts by advanced entities to be born on the earth or are they deformities?

I haven't heard that before but that is interesting. In some cases it could be a deformity and in others it could be a foreshadowing.

Rob:

< blockquote >Second, you say that if the cyclops form is found to be useful then the majority will gravitate toward it. How is having one eye useful in the physical world when two are needed to perceive 3-dimensional space?

The all-seeing eye would be able to perceive three dimensional space and more. To say it could not would be like someone in 1980 saying that computers cannot perceive speech. The seeing of our current eyes is primitive compared to where we are going.

In fact I can see 3-dimensional space and distance with one eye closed all ready.

We can't judge the qualities and abilities of the all-seeing eye by comparing them to our own limited ones because it is a much more advanced model.

Rob:

Third--in regards to the AoD's body being a composite of all the lives on earth. That reminds me of what you've written about regarding the greater molecular life's body being composed of 24 humans. I understood the consciousness of this new life-form to be an evolutionary leap ahead of human consciousness. But didn't you say the AoD was the first self-conscious human? So, he was a human being once just like we are now.

When he incarnated as the first human on the earth he had already overcome all things as a mortal in another solar system in the distant past and was far more than a master.

He made a great sacrifice and incarnated to stimulate the evolution of the humanoids toward self consciousness.

Rob:

Yet he is now so advanced that he is that molecular life-form which is incarnated into a body composed of all earth life? Will we humans one day be that higher molecular life-form that incarnates into the 24 bodies of future molecules? Is that the direction our evolution is headed?

The Ancient of Days has a regular physical body of his own, but shares consciousness with other beings as well as the entire planet. Technically he is the permanent atom of the planet and the representative of the greater logoic life of the whole planet which is a separate entity, but shares consciousness with him.

When a molecule is perfected another entity will incarnate in the molecule and we will share its consciousness, but will still be separate from the higher entity.

Larry:

It is obvious that in the physical world one arm and one leg would be a handicap.

That was precisely the point I was attempting to make. One eye in the physical world is also a handicap.

Why are you assuming that evolution cannot create one eye that can do the work of two or be better than two? That is like a person a century ago saying that a telephone was impossible. It is also possible that our minds will evolve so we will not need arms and legs except for the need to manifest in an acceptable manner.

Larry:

Because humanity has not seen such a being they cannot judge it's beauty.

I would have to disagree. The human form is a "symphony" in bilateral symmetry.

But the beauty of the eye transcends symmetry and beauty is found in the eye itself that goes beyond beauty as found in form. The radiation from the eye creates a spiritual beauty, but even from the physical perspective it is very regal.

Even with our present forms there is beauty in the eyes that goes far beyond symmetry. Some eyes are so lovely you could just stare at then for a long period even though a rough description may make them sound no different than the eyes of Hitler.

Because there is only one of a thing is no reason to not see beauty. We have one mouth, one nose, one navel and one sexual organ and most find beauty in these.

Larry:

Nature has experimented with all forms, ...

True, but it is not the norm to go backwards in physical function (as one eye would have less optical functionality than two). A more likely scenario based on what we know from science is that an organ may atrophy when it becomes less useful. A scenario where another organ took over the functions of "sight" and significantly extended them would be more logical in my view.

This is what the third eye will do in evolution. This will be a new organ that will take over the function of our two eyes and add new dimensions of seeing causing the regular form to eventually change.