Kucinich

2003-9-26 05:26:00

Felix writes:
If you can't watch it live on tv right now, watch the democratic debate tonight at 9pm EST. on MSNBC. This is not just about politics, it's about everything that politics effects, which is everything on earth. I suggest you pay attention to the Congressman from Ohio, Dennis Kucinich. Whether you want to believe it, he is the highest hope for the betterment of the American future. Check out his website - http://www.house.gov/kucinich/ ...."I live each day with a grateful heart and a desire to be of service to humanity", is what he says. I know most of you couldn't care less what Benjamin Creme has said, but hear me out - Creme has said that the Hierarchy supports Kucinich, that Kucinich is the only presidential candidate who is receptive to the mental impressions from the Hierarchy. Creme has also said if Kucinich gets on the bill as the Democratic presidential candidate, he will become President. Obviously the choice is yours who you want to support - the Masters know who They support. Watch the debates tonight!

JJ:
You just can't resist getting us back into politics. I must admit though that it is interesting to know that this is a Creme endorsed candidate. This makes it interesting to examine him.

I can tell you this right now - and this is based on pure common sense - Kucinich does not have a chance in hell of getting the nomination let alone the presidency. This will be just one more example of a failed prediction of Benjamin Creme.

Two weeks ago Kucinich was last in the polls (USA Today) with 2%. Now he is below last with 1%.

Part of the reason for his bad showing may be his terrible hairpiece. I notice that every candidate that looks like he is wearing a rug never seems to go far.

Why is he in last place? One reason is he is so far left that he makes Howard Dean look like Ronald Reagan. I can see why Creme likes him though. Kucinich is for the forced redistribution of wealth with a philosophy in harmony with Creme.

Felix and Creme maintain that Kucinich has the support of the Hierarchy.

Let us pick one of his views that DK has commented on and see how it stands up.

Kucinich strongly opposes nuclear power plants for the generation of power.

Here is what DK said on the matter:

Concerning atomic energy he said the following around 1945: "As the forerunner of that release of energy which will change the mode of human living and inaugurate the new age wherein we shall not have civilizations and their emerging cultures but a world culture and an emerging civilization, thus demonstrating the true synthesis which underlies humanity. The atomic bomb emerged from a first ray Ashram, working in conjunction with a fifth ray group; from the long range point of view, its intent was and is purely beneficent." Externalization of the Hierarchy

"On the physical plane, the great scientific discovery, called colloquially the "splitting of the atom," will be turned eventually to the production of those conditions which will enable mankind to follow the good, the beautiful and the true. This men will then be able to do, freed from the dread presence of purely materialistic thinking. This is no idle vision or vague dream. Many scientists today (and particularly those who love their fellowmen) are not only visioning the non-destructive aspect of atomic energy but are already engaged in harnessing-for the good of humanity-some of its products and its radioactive properties." Rays & Initiations, Pg 648

This "splitting of the atom" that will produce so much good is the process used in nuclear reactors which generate the power for us that Kucinich is so strongly against.

Why then would the Hierarchy support a man who is so against such an important part of the plan of the Hierarchy?

Now, we might ask this question. Who is fighting tooth and nail to do more research into nuclear power and seeks to build more pollution free power plants?

None other than George Bush.

Who then is the likely one to be endorsed by the Hierarchy? The one who is fighting the plan or the one who seeks to further the plan?

The answer is. Of course, the one who seeks to further the plan.

This is one of the few political issues that DK has commented on. I think DK sought to avoid being too political but throughout his writings he did support one important principle by which we can judge many politicians and that is the principle of freedom. He stressed this principle and stated numerous times that it is worth fighting for. He supported the war again Germany and Japan along with the destruction of their tyrannical system and being replaced with a free society.

Would not DK take the same stand today in a similar situation where the tyrannies of Afghanistan and Iraq are destroyed and being replaced with a freer society?

There is no reason to think otherwise.

Also keep in mind that it took eight years to stabilize Germany and Japan until they both reached the point that they could be trusted with self government.

"By their fruits ye shall know them." Bush has brought the hope of freedom to two suppressed nations having over 40,000,000 people. The Dark Brothers are working overtime to dismantle this beginning of freedom that has opened for these people. In addition to this he has been effective in preventing another major attack since 911. This prevention is something that few expected a couple years ago.

Kucinich indicates he would pull out of Iraq and even fought the president on the War against the Taliban in Afghanistan. If he had been president the Taliban would still be starving women, cutting their faces apart and the people of Iraq would still be tortured with no hope of freedom.

It is interesting that you point out two people who Creme admires who seem to be miles away from the Plan discussed by DK. First Sai Baba, a guru of whom there is mountains of evidence that he sexually abuses little boys and uses magic tricks to con followers and now Kucinich who seems to have little in common with the Hierarchy except maybe a vegetarian diet. This means little, however, when you consider that Hitler was a vegetarian.

If a word in the dictionary were mispelled, how would we know? Steven Wright