Negating the Beast
Reader: Aren’t we all sick of hearing how this one channels Seth or Ramtha or whoever? I got SO sick of hearing everyone say they were channeling someone, it brought me to a place where I couldn’t read another channeled book. Then suddenly JJ’s first book just appeared on my computer screen and I’ve been here ever since.
JJ: Have you noticed, as this reader has, that most of the spiritual teachers of this generation have called upon the authority of the Beast, or an outward entity of authority, to support their words? Here are some of the ways:
[1] I am channeling this great entity therefore you need to believe my words because they are not mine but are from a Master or great Spirit.
[2] I am the reincarnation of ___ therefore if you reject me you would have rejected ___. You need to believe me without question.
[3] I have been visited by the great being who is ____. Therefore you need to believe me or you will be cursed.
More could probably be listed, but you get the idea.
One of my most important missions is to expose the source and power of the Beast and the means to destroy it. Therefore, the fewer claims I make the better for it gives readers the complete freedom to reject anything I say and not have any guilt from the possibility of offending God or some great being.
Many there are who have merely done a good job of creative writing and claimed to channel someone who was a figment of their imagination or lay claim to an experience that never happened. The writings of The Teaching of the Masters of the Far East is one example. It is said that Spaulding never even wet to India but had a good knowledge of metaphysical principles and wrote them in story form – but instead of stating they were fiction he published them as a true account. This has happened many times and it causes numerous seekers to not question any of the teachings – some of which are not true.
Jesus said the path to the Kingdom of God is narrow and few there be that find it. Few find it because they are distracted by the need for the authority of the Beast. Many want to know for sure if my account of John is 100% true or false so they can either cling to him as a Beast or seek another Beast.
As it is, the acceptance of all the teachings through me are left up to the readers own soul. Progress is slow at present for “few” can handle this path but the numbers will grow during the Aquarian Age.
Re: Negating the Beast
A reader accused me of presenting myself as the type of beastly authority I criticized. He says, “You have said you are the reincarnation of a friend of John, of someone planning Hitler’s assassination.
JJ: This was not a person of any spiritual authority and a virtual historical unknown when I made mention of him.
Reader: In your books you make reference to people in the past who you were a reincarnation of that did significant things.
JJ: This was in a book of fiction with no authority attached and no historical figure that I was a reincarnation of was even named.
Reader: You have written in your book how a great entity of light went into your body and overshadowed you.
JJ: Again, this was in a book labeled fiction with no authority attached. It may or may not be true.
Reader: That all the dark forces were attacking you. All this people on the list from reading your book, have taken this all seriously. I can tell by reading the posts.
JJ So dark forces attacking you makes you a beastly figure? Wow. A number of people in the group have recounted a number of attacks. Do you view them the same way???
Reader: And you claiming that you are the disciple of john in your book.
JJ: You’re making things up. I make no such claim. Making a statement in a fiction book is not making any claim. The only claim is the actual teachings are true as far as my ability to discern and teach it is concerned.
And as far as claims go there is a great difference between one relating a real experience and another who creates a false story of being visited by some great being so he can speak with authority.
Rehash of DK?
A reader accused me of arriving at my teachings by rehashing DK or other spiritual teachers of the past.
Overall, I have gone out of my way to ensure that the teachings I present are not a rehash or merely a rewording of something already presented. I think the reader realizes this and if his point is that many of the components of my teachings have been presented in some form in the past then this is true to a degree. However, probably the only thing I have taught that could be considered a real rehash would be my classes on White Magic which did indeed elaborate on DK’s book, but even here it was adding to by giving out interpretations that are new.
On the other hand, most of my teachings either present new material or new light on old principles. For instance, the Keys of Knowledge presented in the Immortal series along with other teachings there are not found anywhere else. No one has written about the Molecular Relationship before me. In fact, I had to invent the phrase to even intelligently talk about it.
In the Gathering of Lights I present the gathering as a principle behind evolution, something no one did before me that I know of.
I was the first, about 40 years ago, to write a whole book proving reincarnation from the scriptures. Since then many others have used my ideas and references.
The Gods of the Bible presents the idea that man and God are one with a thoroughness from the Bible and the Hebrew in a way that had not been done before.
My new book, The Unveiling, gives a totally different interpretation of Revelation that nothing else out there even resembles.
Then, if you go through the archives and pick any article the chances are you will find no other teacher, past or present, saying the same thing. I might add though sometimes I have explained esoteric teachings of the past for the purpose of bringing students up to speed with concepts often discussed in metaphysical circles. These could be considered more of a clarification than a rehash.
As far as facts that are used in many of my writings – yes many of them are used by others and where pertinent I reference where they came from. but facts are much different than a picture painted though the grouping of many facts and ideas. Einstein used many facts readily available when he presented the theory of Relativity, but that did not diminish the value of the new picture he presented.
Question: How do you measure success?
JJ Measuring success is quite easy. Are you achieving the goals you have set for yourself? If so you are successful. In doing this I would suggest you not set a goal of having everyone like you or your work. Anyone who does this will never feel successful.
Question: When you say God has to let the old universe go…does that mean it will all go back to a point known as the BIG CRUNCH? and no longer expand, but come back on itself and die out…then GOD creates a new universe?
JJ: Essentially, yes. The universe will eventually die and matter will return to spirit for billions of years of pralaya. Then a new universe will be born slightly more complex than this one.
When a man’s willing and eager, the gods join in. – Aeschylus
June 26, 2012
Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE
JJ’s Amazon page HERE