Should We All Be Vegetarians?

Should We All Be Vegetarians?

A Reader Comments:

It has been said that the Spiritual Hierarchy is the saving force and the stewards of the human kingdom Just as man should be the stewards of the animal kingdom who reach their high goal by their interaction and stimulation with the human kingdom. Simply preserving animals so that they can be eaten at some future point somehow does not seem very steward like to me.

JJ: Yes, DK did point out our responsibility to the animal kingdom and even said that humanity would turn out to be saviors of them indicating that the time would come that humans would eventually reach a point where they would do much to make their lives more safe and comfortable.

Whereas it is true that there is abuse today I predict this will decline to the point that it is a rarity and animal life will improve in the following ways.

(1) Humans will assist wild animals so they will not suffer so much in the wild from starvation and cold. Forest fires will be more controlled in the future so fewer animals will be burned alive.

(2) People will increasingly become vegetarians so not so many farm animals will be raised.  Those which do continue will be well cared for.

(3) Humans will assist with population control of wild animals to insure species are preserved yet do not overpopulate. They will control natural predators and hunters will be used in this process for some time to come.

(4) As diet shifts away from meat farms and ranches for meat will grow smaller and more personalized.  Those who do eat meat will demand the animals be well cared for.

(5) Humanity has made greater strides than is realized for taking care of their pets and our relationship with them will only improve and the little abuse in this area will continue to decrease.

When I was a kid a lot of people shot stray cats and dogs for sport or even tortured them. Others would tie explosives on a cat’s tail and watch him explode thinking that was funny.

Here’s some of the ways they had fun in Europe several hundred years ago:

“Players with hands tied behind them competed to kill a cat nailed to a post by battering it to death with their heads, at the risk of cheeks ripped open or eyes scratched out by the frantic animal’s claws….

“Or a pig enclosed in a wide pen was chased by men with clubs to the laughter of spectators as he ran squealing from the blows until beaten lifeless.”

“But the practical function of cruel punishments was just a part of their appeal. Spectators enjoyed cruelty, even when it served no judicial purpose. Torturing animals, for example, was considered good clean fun. In 16th-century Paris, a popular form of entertainment was cat-burning, in which a cat was hoisted in a sling on a stage and slowly lowered into a fire. According to the historian Norman Davies, “The spectators, including kings and queens, shrieked with laughter as the animals, howling with pain, were singed, roasted, and finally carbonized.” Also popular were dogfights, bull runs, cockfights, public executions of “criminal” animals, and bearbaiting, in which a bear would be chained to a post and dogs would tear it apart or be killed in the effort.”

From: The Better Angels Of Our Nature By Steven Pinker

Speaking of cockfights, they were very prevalent when I was a kid as my dad took me to them regularly and had his own fighting roosters.

We have made great progress in the treatment of animals and each other over time, especially in the last 50 years. Most would not dream of mistreating animals today as they were in times of old.

That said, hunting will be used as a means to preserve animals but not an end of itself. Some who want to preserve certain species would prefer to not to offer them for hunting but realize that it is better to sacrifice 10% of a population to paying hunters than to allow 99-100% to disappear from the face of the earth.

Slaughterhouses are accused by some of skinning animals alive or beating them with clubs.  I’m sure this claim must be exaggerated. This never happened at the meat-packing plant where I worked in shipping back in 1970.  Wikipedia describes the process which was similar to what we used:

“Cattle are rendered unconscious by applying an electric shock of 300 volts and 2 amps to the back of the head, effectively stunning the animal, or by use of a captive bolt pistol to the front of the cow’s head (a pneumatic or cartridge-fired captive bolt). “Swine can be rendered unconscious by CO2/inert gas stunning.

“Animals are hung upside down by both of their hind legs on the processing line.

“The carotid artery and jugular vein are severed with a knife, blood drains, causing death through exsanguination.”

We used the cartridge-fired captive bolt system and the animal was instantly rendered unconscious and never regained it. There was little if any physical suffering.  They did seem to have a psychic sense they were going to be slaughtered a few minutes before they were killed.

As far as skinning them alive goes I can’t imagine the people I used to work with doing such a thing.  As it was, the Kill Floor was the least desirable place to work, and even these employees would have been repulsed if ordered to skin an animal  while consciously alive.

It is unrealistic to think that farm animals would just be miraculously cared for if we all became vegetarians.  Farmers raise cattle and pigs so they can sell then for meat.  If no one buys the meat then who will care for them – the vegetarians?  I don’ t think so.

“PETA claims that their first priority above all else is animal liberation, however on the most basic level this is clearly not true. With the millions of dollars PETA makes every year, they have a grand total of one animal shelter. As much as PETA advocates an animal’s right to fair and ethical treatment, this is not a no kill shelter. In fact, PETA has killed roughly 85% of the animals its shelter has “rescued.”

In many cases, shelters are forced to euthanize animals because they lack the finances to care for them. This is not the case for PETA, who in 2007 made over $30 million dollars. That’s enough money to finance their no kill shelter, and open multiple other no kill shelters.”

If PETA with lots of money do not take much care for animals, then what makes you think the general population would care for cattle if we all turned vegetarians?

Reader: Cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, and chickens on the road to extinction because of vegetarians? You are mistaken. We keep these animals even when we are not killing them for food. And they wouldn’t go extinct. You seem to go from one extreme to the other.

JJ: Who is this “we” you’re talking about?  I know of no one with a pet cow who doesn’t plan to use it for meat or milk.

As far as animal abuse goes, I’m sure all of us here are against it and the numbers that do not support abuse are growing.  It’s only a matter of time before conditions improve for all farm animals.

Farm animals are in a different category than those in the wild or pets. Wild animals can take care of themselves and humans take care of pets because they serve a human need. Farm animals like cows, pigs, goats and sheep are taken care of because we eat them. If not for that they would have extreme difficulty in surviving. This is why the switch to vegetarianism needs to be made on a gradual basis which is basically what is happening now.

I won’t eat anything that has intelligent life, but I would gladly eat a network executive or a politician. – Marty Feldman

March 31, 2012

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

The Face of Jesus

The Face of Jesus

Here is an idea for a group assignment. There are two portraits online where the artists claimed to paint Jesus from actually seeing him. The first is the one you mentioned by Akaine is HERE

The second is by Glenda Green HERE

Take a look and these two and see if either registers as a true image.

Next go to Google image search 

Type in “Jesus portrait” and scroll through the images. If you see any that strike a chord give us a link with your impressions.

Jan 10, 2012

Thanks for your comments and participation on the face of Jesus. There is something one can say for sure about him if he were to come across a true picture which is this. The eyes would be interesting and exude intelligence and a strong life force. Take this picture for instance HERE

 It is a composite put together using research and guesswork and though some ingredients may be more accurate than the traditional pictures the eyes are surely way off. The guy just doesn’t look very bright and if a person is truly intelligent it is revealed through the eyes as well as the whole look of the individual.

Other pictures make Jesus look weak, wimpy, and effeminate in a syrupy way. These type of pictures can be ruled out as being good representations

I do not see any pictures on the internet that strike me as being 100% accurate but some capture part of his essence. I believe that  Akaine’s portrait captures him the best.

It is interesting that Colton Burpo, who had a near death experience and saw Jesus when he was a child, reported that he looked like Akaine’s portrait of him.

I did see a portrait many years ago in a tabloid that impressed me as accurate. I cut it out and saved it for a long time and was finally lost in one of my moves. It hasn’t surfaced anywhere on the internet. I wish I had it to show it to you. I’m sure the group would be impressed.

It was painted by a lady who claimed to have had a vision of Christ when he was in his twenties. His hair wasn’t that long and he didn’t have a beard at the time, but it was the most interesting looking human being I had ever seen.

A reader brings up an interesting item of discussion. If one has soul contact does this mean he would recognize a true picture of Jesus?

Not necessarily. If one had known Jesus in a past life this would be possible but if he had not then it would require true psychic powers rather than soul contact to bring forth the right image.

Remember soul contact deals with principles more than data. Sometimes when it is important the soul will send an impression on a piece of data but more often than not we are on our own to reason it out. On the other hand, the person with reliable soul contact is very capable in seeing true principles and how they play out in this reality.

Reader: How about if the overshadowed Jesus were actually standing before us? It seems almost incomprehensible that MOST folks wouldn’t feel the impact – I suppose to some it would just evoke irritation rather than peace but SOMETHING would register in almost everyone wouldn’t it?

JJ The actual presence of a person is much different than a photo or painting. In this case soul contact is a great help for you can sense the aura of the person as well as his inner being. As I said before one with soul contact can recognize another with it in their physical presence and often in communication away from their presence.

A reader posted this:

Glenda seems to claim much more than an impression. Here are some quotes from her book – love Without End:

“Jesus appeared to me and was with me for almost four months between November 1991 and March 1992.

“In the fall of 1992, much to my surprise, those special circumstances were arranged and another vision was brought to me. It happened in a little country church where I had given the evening presentation. During the closing prayer, I noticed the rare fragrance I always sensed when Jesus was in my studio. Lifting my head and opening my eyes brought confirmation of what I suspected. He was there! Without a word to startle the others, I quietly beheld a fascinating process. With every passing second He regressed in age until He became an infant in His mother’s arms. Mary was young and classically Hebrew in appearance. In her loveliness, she was the image of innocence and barely more than a child herself. After a few minutes, the vision stabilized and remained unchanged for the two months required to paint it. The Flame of Love, as the painting came to be called,

“A wry grin began to take shape on His face as He focused a quizzical look at me.

“His eyes were like clear pools of water, as I gazed into them, and beheld the simplicity of His succinct reply.

“While nodding to the reality of our history, His countenance remained calm and serene. A comforting smile spread across His face…

“In His presence there was love overflowing. Glowing with an aura of contentment and happiness, His face radiated joy, and He often smiled from ear to ear. I was fascinated, however, by the fact that I never saw Him laugh.”

This story impresses many, but I tend to side with Akaine’s Jesus as the intelligence and passion of his look are striking. In addition, it was quite a miracle that she first sketched him from a vision at the age of four and finished the now famous oil painting at the age of six.

Cherishing children is the mark of a civilized society. – Joan Ganz Cooney

Jan 9, 2012

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Plans to Initiate

Plans to Initiate

Reader: With regards to these initiates that are mentioned (Lincoln, Jesus, Washington, Buddha, etc), I understand that it was in their book of life to come here on earth and initiate. Hence, it must be part of a person’s destiny to initiate, part of their soul plan that is and consequently not just some random happening. Is that correct or can someone initiate something…accidentally?

JJ No work done by an initiate is accidental but some of it is unplanned.

In between lives we do plan our next life. The higher the initiate the more accurate the plan and the greater will be the work. But things do not always go according to plan. Sometimes the work is frustrated and other times it comes out different or even better than expected.

Once the initiate is on the earth and sees his vision and sets his goals the move forward doesn’t happen by accident but through great intelligent effort.

Reader: And when someone does initiate, is there a time frame like a specific age or a Saturn cycle or something that connotes this? I know there is the age 21 when a person integrates his soul wisdom and gets to the point where he was at his last life. Then 28 at the first Saturn cycle where a person begins his life work. Then what?

JJ: A person can initiate a work at any age where he has developed communication skills. Check out this child who began her initiating work at the age of four: LINK

After the age of 21 and after each Saturn cycle we have an opportunity to move forward our personal development which may or may not have something to do with initiating a project or work.

When you have the skills to initiate then you can begin a work if you are so inclined no matter what your age.

Reader: Something tells me this initiate thing must be key to having a longer life. You somehow keep your brain cells alive.

JJ: Some initiates may die young – such as Steve Jobs, but they will eventually learn the secrets of long life and extended life. On the other hand, others like Paramahansa Yogananda, who died at age 59, is said to have chosen to leave his body as his mission was complete.

There are indeed two ways that we evolve. The first is through trial and error. Eventually the next learning point dawns on us as we stumble forward.

The second is with the assistance of a teacher or some type of guidance beyond the physical, perhaps from a higher life.

Now, even in the first category we are not alone for we slowly progress through interaction with other lives who are fellow travelers. These may not be able to explain to us the knowledge we need but they may stimulate or motivate us.

On this note DK gave an interesting thought. He said that higher lives looked upon primitive humans and their struggle to survive and basically felt sorry for them. They decided to help them and came to the earth and stimulated their minds greatly speeding up their evolution. He said that if they had not done this humanity would have still moved forward but much more slowly. The most advanced among us would be living like the Australian Bushmen in a primitive condition with little civilization. It would have been a long time in the future yet before we would have arrived where we are now.

As I’ve reflected on this it could give an explanation as to why we have not yet picked up an intelligent radio signal from another solar system. Perhaps we are one of the few planets that have received such stimulation and most of the life on other planets is still quite primitive. Maybe one of our purposes is to visit them in the future and stimulate them.

I received this from a fellow Keys member.

“I’m passing this on because it worked for me today…Dr Oz on TV said that to reach inner peace we should always finish things we start, and we all could use more calm in our lives during the hectic Holiday season. I looked around my house to find things I’d started and hadn’t finished, so I finished off a bottle of CROWN, a bottle of Chardonnay, a bodle of Baileys, a butle of wum, tha mainder of Valiuminun scriptins, an a box a chocletz. Yu haf no idr how fablus I feel rite now. Sned this to all who need inner piss. And telum u luvum.”

Dec 30, 2011

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

 

The Mystery of the Father

The Mystery of the Father

Here’s some dialog I’ve been having with a member who has an LDS background.

Reader: When you bring up Sanat Kumara, the first Adam, the Ancient of Days, I think of Brigham Young’s Adam God theory. Is this what Brigham Young was referring to? The other question I have: If what you are saying is true, then Sanat Kumara does not appear to be the Father of our spirits. If not, then who is the Father our spirits? Who is our Heavenly Father, the one Jesus Christ referred when he said, “I go to your God and my God”?

JJ: Brigham had a rough idea about Adam God but did not know the details.

Our spirits were not created through heavenly parents having physical sex as taught in m Mormonism. We are eternal beings and have always been. Our essence has been stimulated by other beings and we basically create ourselves with the help of others who have progressed far beyond us. The form you have now was designed by you in conjunction with higher lives and was different in past lives. After each life you participate in designing a more perfect body.

Reader: Various scriptures cll us the children of God such as this one: “The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together.” Romans 8:16-17

Then numerous times Jesus and others refer to God as our Father. Are we not to take the words “children” and “Father” literally here, but figuratively?

Also, when Jesus speaks of his heavenly Father, is he referring to Sanat Kumara?

JJ: Notice that Joseph Smith in the King Follett Discourse did not teach the idea of heavenly parents literally giving birth to our spirits.

“We say that God himself is a self-existent being. Who told you so? It is correct enough; but how did it get into you heads? Who told you that man did not exist in like manner upon the same principles? Man does exist upon the same principles. God made a tabernacle and put a spirit into it, and it became a living soul. (Refers to the old Bible.) How does it read in the Hebrew? It does not say in the Hebrew that God created the spirit of man. It says “God made man out of the earth and put into him Adam’s spirit, and so became a living body.” The mind or the intelligence which man possesses is co-equal with God himself.

Intelligence is eternal and exists upon a self-existent principle. It is a spirit from age to age, and there is no creation about it. All the minds and spirits that God ever sent into the world are susceptible of enlargement.” End Quote

“There is no outside creation to our spirit essence. The form we have now had a beginning at our physical birth and changes from age to age or life to life. There are those who assist and have assisted in our progress, and in a sense they are fathers and mothers to us.

Our highest spiritual essence is our eternal intelligence or monad which could be called our Father in heaven but higher lives are also referred to as our fathers. Melchizedek overshadowed Jesus and Jesus referred to him as Father.

Reader: Yes, Mormonism has always believed in the above Joseph Smith quote that we have always co-existed (in some form & essence) with God. Notwithstanding, what about the following principle- Matthew 6:10 “Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.” The Zohar adds more to this principle: Observe that God has made the earthly kingdom after the pattern of the heavenly kingdom, and whatever is done on earth has been preceded by its prototype in heaven. -Soncino Zohar, Bereshith, Section 1, Page 197a How could something as foundational as marriage, sexual intimacy, children” the very heart of our earthly sociality ” not even exist in heaven? Yet, the language of the scriptures are filled with family references ” The Father, The Son, Children of God, Sons, Daughters, etc. How could this be?

JJ: You are right that all things that exist on earth first existed in heaven, or higher spheres. There are seven planes altogether. The next level up from us is the astral composed of emotional energy. This is what Mormons generally refer to as the spirit prison. The next up is the mental plane composed of mental matter and is directed by the energy of mind. These three are the worlds of form, the mental being the highest is similar to the LDS celestial kingdom.

Above the mental is the buddhic plane from which true intuition originates. This intuition links the worlds of form to the next plane, the atmic. This plane governs the universe of ideas. On this plane originates all creation that eventually materializes here on the earth. An idea there is carried through the intuitive plane to the mind, then to emotional matter in the spirit world until it materializes here on the earth. The concept of the form of your body originated in the atmic plane and descended as a seed until it reached the physical plane and developed as a physical vehicle for you.

The idea that our archetypes were created previously is true, but just somewhat different than orthodox Mormonism believes. Ideas originate in a formless plane and forms are merely symbols of the ideas from whence they came.

Reader: You even referenced family language in your last post stating, “Our highest spiritual essence is our eternal father in heaven but higher lives are also referred to as our fathers.” Why use the term “father”? What definition of father are you using?

JJ: The word father is used a number of different ways in the scriptures and other writings. It doesn’t always mean a literal father of a body. Even on this plane an adopted child calls his caretaker his father.

Consider the word in reference to a prophesy of Christ:

“For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.” Isa 9:6

Notice that Isaiah called prophesied Messiah “the everlasting Father.

The Book of Mormon does something similar:

“I would that ye should understand that God himself shall come down among the children of men, and shall redeem his people. And because he dwelleth in flesh he shall be called the Son of God, and having subjected the flesh to the will of the Father, being the Father and the Son ” The Father, because he was conceived by the power of God; and the Son, because of the flesh; thus becoming the Father and Son. And THEY ARE ONE God, yea, the very Eternal Father of heaven and earth. and thus the flesh (Jesus) becoming subject to the Spirit (Christ), or the Son to the Father…” Mosiah 15:1-5.

One reason the Messiah is called Father is that he initiated the fathering of many sons of God. Any creator is a father to his creations.

Reader: Finally, curious to your response to this thought too- “Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.” John 20:17 Why would Jesus tell Mary Magdalene this if he was referring to Melchizedek? Was Melchizedek Mary Magdalene’s Father too?

JJ: Melchizedek, who overshadowed Jesus was also the Adam of the Bible and responsible for the creation of many of the sons of God here on the earth. He is therefore the father of all who aspire to be such including Mary Magdalene.

Above him is Sanat Kumara who is responsible for the creation of all human life of earth making him our Father also.

In addition to this if we were able (as did Christ) to ascend to the sixth plane we would arrive at the plane of the monad where the seed of our existence and intelligence resides. This dwells as a point of light in divine space something like a star dwells in physical space. This divine space is the mind of God and there is only one space which is the ultimate Father of us all.

There is nothing more likely to start disagreement among people or countries than an agreement. – E. B. White

Dec 15, 2011

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Our Ancient Past

Our Ancient Past

Reader Question: Could you tell is more about the serpent race of our ancient past back to Atlantis?

JJ The Atlantis mentioned by Plato as existing around 10,000 years ago was just a small remnant of the civilization. HPB taught that Atlantis reached its greatest quality of civilization hundreds of thousands of years before this. The reptile people were most likely of great antiquity.

There have been many strange human-like skeletons found, some even with horns. To find interesting videos giving evidence of our serpent past just do a search on YouTube for “The Serpent Gods”

In addition to any physical evidence there are many stories and legends passed down about the reptile race. Here are some:

Male Boreas (Aquilon to the Romans): the Greek god of the cold north wind, described by Pausanias as a winged man with serpents instead of legs.

Cecrops I: the mythical first King of Athens was half man, half snake

Dragon Kings: creatures from Chinese mythology sometimes depicted as reptilian humanoids

Fu Xi: serpentine founding figure from Chinese mythology

Glycon: a snake god who had the head of a man.

Ningizzida, Lord of the Tree of Life, mentioned in the Epic of Gilgamesh and linked to the water serpent constellation Hydra.

Quetzalcoatl or the “feathered serpent”, the creator god and sky god of the Aztecs; variously depicted as a man, a serpent, or a reptilian humanoid.

Sobek: Ancient Egyptian crocodile-headed god

Shenlong: a Chinese dragon thunder god, depicted with a human head and a dragon’s body

Typhon, the “father of all monsters” in Greek mythology, was a man from the waist up, and a mass of seething vipers from the waist down.

Zahhak, a figure from Zoroastrian mythology who, in Ferdowsi’s epic Shahnameh, grows a serpent on either shoulder

Female Cihuacoatl, literally “Snake Woman”, an Aztec goddess Echidna, the wife of Typhon in Greek mythology, was half woman, half snake.

Moura Encantada from Portuguese and Galician folklore. The Gorgons: Sisters in Greek mythology who had serpents for hair.

The Lamia: a child-devouring female demon from Greek mythology depicted as half woman, half serpent.

Nuwa: serpentine founding figure from Chinese mythology

Wadjet pre-dynastic snake goddess of Lower Egypt – sometimes depicted as half snake, half woman

The White Snake: a figure from Chinese folklore

Some djinn in Islamic mythology are described as alternating between human and serpentine forms.

(Devanagari: reptilian beings from Hindu mythology said to live underground and interact with human beings on the surface.

The Serpent: a character from the Genesis creation narrative occasionally depicted with legs, and sometimes identified with Satan, though its representations have been both male and female.

Question: Were the lizard men a uniform humanoid race or several different types of reptiles?

JJ You can use the Law of Correspondences to discover this. Look at all the varieties of the human race. This would indicate there was also a variety of reptiles. Also, the variety of serpent images retrieved through archeology indicate a variety of serpents in the past.

Question: Does this relate directly to the snake story in the Garden of Eden?

JJ: Yes, the idea of an intelligent serpent goes back to ancient times.

Question: Also, I always wonder what happens to those planets where the lizards kill off all the humans. Are they totally incapable of ever progressing further?

JJ Even steps backward are steps forward in the total scheme of things. If you take a wrong turn and find out it was a mistake and get back on the right road then the wrong turn was necessary to discover the right direction. There is a limit to the progression a soul can make in any form and sooner or later one must move on.

Question: Do those planets eventually get destroyed?

JJ All life forms fulfill a necessary function and do not get destroyed just because they are dominated by reptile life. Some planets and even star systems get destroyed for a variety of reasons – the main reason is that they have outlived their purpose.

Question: Will we fly there someday on a seeding mission and blow them away with far advanced tech and spiritual skills and re-seed the planet with humans? This might be a lot like ordinary seeding missions except with extermination at the beginning.

JJ The common-sense thing will be to leave their evolution to themselves.

Question: We’ve been told Sanat Kumara is an innovator, not doing things precisely the same way as before but shortening up the process by introducing a lot more pain. Did I state this idea accurate?

JJ The enhancement came from stimulating the minds of humans more than pain. There was already plenty of pain to go around.

Question: So were many of us formerly lizard men? Now we/they use human bodies – ourselves, our families, our friends? Half and half? Or some other ratio?

JJ Either in this system or some other most (or perhaps all) of us have been in the serpent kingdom.

Question: So would lizard men naturally think more like a hunter/killer?

JJ Think Kinglons from Star Trek.

Reader Comment: Another issue that often reveals my ignorance is that of “root races”. I would love to see an outline showing root races one through now and beyond with a few paragraphs under each detailing similarities and differences and maybe something about origins.

JJ The root races are pretty simple; it’s the sub rootraces that are difficult to follow. The first two root races were in etheric matter so there is no physical remnant of them. The third, the Lemurian, has a residual in the Australian Aborigines but were more animal like in the beginning.

The Orientals are a residual of the fourth, the Atlantean and the fifth is the Aryan.

Question: JJ says to look for sixth root race bodies to begin appearing even now. He says the design will pay far more attention to beauty where previous innovations were more utilitarian. So who do you nominate as an example of a sixth root race cutie?

JJ The sixth root race will not be a totally different looking people but a synthesis and refinement of all the races we have now. When it is fully in dominance the average person will be somewhat tan and very refined in features. Some of the best-looking people of all races foreshadow the race to come.

Question: Does a knowledge of esoteric books make you an initiate?

The books we read do not make us initiates, though solid knowledge helps propel us along the path. I have encountered quite a few who have read AAB who show few of the signs of being initiates.

We are shaped and fashioned by what we love. – Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Dec 3, 2011

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Steve Jobs Handwriting

Steve Jobs Handwriting

A reader found signatures of Apple founders Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne and wanted me to take a look and maybe give some analysis.

Since Steve’s signature is from 1976 I did some digging and found several more recent ones. Unfortunately, I cannot find any of his regular handwriting which would reveal more.

Several things are what I would expect and several were not.

Because Steve had cancer, I would suspect that he had problems with suppression but there is virtually no suppression in his signature. It is strange he died of cancer when he seemed to be on a very good diet and was expressive emotionally.

There is one thing I noticed that could cause emotional problems linked to cancer and that is he would yield to others, sometime against his better judgment. This is surprising since he is portrayed as being fairly unyielding. I think this yielding characteristic shows up in the book where time and time again others would share their ideas and views and he would reject them but then the next day he would be totally accepting of them and sometimes act like they were his own. His handwriting would indicate he changed his mind largely because he did a lot of thinking of how to accommodate others even though this did not seem to be true.

Even though he does not suppress emotion he did suppress his thoughts and was quite secretive.

Another thing that is somewhat surprising is he was quite insecure and he was very nervous about taking chances. What compensated for this though was his personal gutsiness and courage. These would override his fears.

One more thing that may surprise some is that he wasn’t concerned about getting a lot of personal recognition. If his products were appreciated then he was happy and that was the main thing.

His writing, especially his later writing shows that he really thought outside the box and was unconventional in many ways. He was very unconventional in almost every way, and, even though some portray him as a difficult personality, the writing reveals that he had powerful personal magnetism and charm. I can see why many were very devoted to him.

He was a very balanced thinker and interested in all phases of life, the spiritual, social and material.

He was intuitive, creative and often compared his work to art which is interesting because he could have been an artist if he had put his attention in that direction.

The interesting thing about Wozniak’s writing is that he writes more like a schoolteacher than an engineer or computer genius. He’s a lot more of a people person and not as intelligent as I expected.

Reader Comment: This isn’t yielding, this is stealing. But, he, himself, admitted that the best ideas are stolen.

JJ It was both. Stealing ideas does not negate the yielding. I think stealing is a harsh way of putting it when he was running the company and already owned whatever anyone produced. Also, both Jobs and the employee involved knew where the ideas came from. Jobs was very sparse with his praise making such very valuable. I think that he felt that just using an employee’s idea was enough to give them recognition.

Everyone thinks a little differently and one has to put himself in the guy’s shoes to understand. I think that those who worked close with him did understand and that is why most really liked working for him and supported him despite his quirky ways.

How Many Masters?

Question: How many masters have there been that lived on the Earth, in the flesh throughout history of the Earth?

JJ DK names Twelve plus the Christ who work directly with humanity but there are others who work with other kingdoms and projects. The total number is not given. Positions held by Masters come and go and we are not given the total number in history but DK did say this over a century ago:

“The workers, or adepts, concerned with the evolution of the human family, comprise sixty-three, if the three great Lords are counted in making the nine times seven necessary for the work. Of these forty-nine work exoterically, if it might be so expressed, and fourteen esoterically, being more concerned with the subjective manifestation. Not many of Their names are known to the public, nor would it be wise in many cases to reveal Who They are, where They dwell, and what is Their particular sphere of activity.” Initiation Human and Solar, Page 51

If you want to become full, let yourself be empty.

If you want to be reborn, let yourself die.

If you want to be given everything, give everything up. – Lao Tzu

Dec 2, 2011

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

 

Giants and Saint Bernadette

Giants and Saint Bernadette

I was asked about the origin of the giants mentioned in the Bible. I haven’t placed much attention on. Many people think they are a product of angels and humans.

Here are some comments of H P Blavatsky from Isis Unveiled:

According to the claims of the Babylonian priests, corroborated by Eupolemus,*** “the city of Babylon, owes its foundation to those who were saved from the catastrophe of the deluge; they were the giants and they built the tower which is noticed in history.”**** These giants who were great astrologers and had received moreover from their fathers, “the sons of God,” every instruction pertaining to secret matters, instructed the priests in their turn, and left in the temples all the records of the periodical cataclysm that they had witnessed themselves. This is how the high priests came by the knowledge of the great years.

“And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. . . . There were giants in the earth in those days,” etc., with this part of the Hindu cosmogony, in the Vedas, which speaks of the descent of the Brahmans. The first Brahman complains of being alone among all his brethren without a wife. Notwithstanding that the Eternal advises him to devote his days solely to the study of the Sacred Knowledge (Veda), the first-born of mankind insists. Provoked at such ingratitude, the eternal gave Brahman a wife of the race of the Daints, or giants, from whom all the Brahmans maternally descend.

Thus the entire Hindu priesthood is descended, on the one hand, from the superior spirits (the sons of God), and from Daintany, a daughter of the earthly giants, the primitive men.* “And they bare children to them; the same became mighty men which were of old; men of renown.”** The same is found in the Scandinavian cosmogonical fragment. In the Edda is given the description to Gangler by Har, one of the three informants (Har, Jafuhar, and Tredi) of the first man, called Bur, “the father of Bor, who took for wife Besla, a daughter of the giant Bolthara, of the race of the primitive giants.” The full and interesting narrative may be found in the Prose Edda, sects. 4-8, in Mallett’s Northern Antiquities.** The same groundwork underlies the Grecian fables about the Titans; and may be found in the legend of the Mexicans –

She also claimed to see bones of giants when she was in India.

Saint Bernadette’s Body

I was asked about an apparent miracle of the preservation of Saint Bernadette’s body.

The miracle is not as impressive as the stories lead one to believe. Apparently, her body was preserved beyond the normal decay, but still did decay nevertheless, and had to be treated with wax to make her look lifelike. this is from Wikipedia:

In 1925, the church exhumed the body for a third time. They took relics, which were sent to Rome. A precise imprint of the face was molded so that the firm of Pierre Imans in Paris could make a wax mask based on the imprints and on some genuine photos. This was common practice for relics in France, as it was feared that the blackish tinge to the face and the sunken eyes and nose would make an unpleasant impression on the public. Imprints of the hands were also taken for the presentation of the body and the making of wax casts. The remains were then placed in a gold and crystal reliquary in the Chapel of Saint Bernadette at the mother house in Nevers. The site is visited by many pilgrims and the body of Saint Bernadette is still shown despite being nearly 130 years old.  

Pay attention to your enemies, for they are the first to discover your mistakes. – Antisthenes

Nov 30, 2011

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

 

The Spiritual Journey

The Spiritual Journey

I’ve been having some dialog with a fellow seeker who came from a Christian background and has been transitioning to esoteric teachings.  I took a similar journey. When I first came across one of the Bailey books around 1966, I had just returned from a two-year mission for the Mormon church and was very dedicated.

I was in a used bookstore looking at books in the new age-self-improvement section when the owner seemed to notice I was interested in unusual spiritually related books. He pulled a book off the top shelf and handed it to me and said, “I think you may find this book interesting.”

The book was titled “Letters on Occult Meditation” by Alice A. Bailey. Now many Christian believers associate the word “occult” with satanism, so the title itself tested my open mind. I then opened the book and noticed a lengthy list of other books by the same author.

“The Consciousness of the Atom” caught my attention and sounded interesting. Next my eyes registered, “A Treatise on Cosmic Fire.” Strange title I thought., What in the world is cosmic fire? Then Reappearance of the Christ and Telepathy sounded interesting.

Basically, it was this booklist that caused me to buy the book. I was fascinated with some of the titles.

I took the book home and read the first 20 pages or so and then put it down contemplating the following thoughts.

Thought number one: Whoever wrote this is the most intelligent author I had read in my life. Such great intelligence tells me I should take the writing seriously.

Thought number two: It looked like a number of his teachings were not in harmony with the teachings of my church, especially reincarnation. My church taught that this was a doctrine from the devil.

I realized that if I studied the Bailey books and embraced them that my spiritual life would be drastically altered, and was not ready for such a transition.  I put the book on the bookshelf and didn’t read anything else from the Bailey material for five more years.

After that time passed, I had reached a point of tension, discovered the truth of reincarnation, and decided to closely examine the teachings. It seemed that “A Treatise on White Magic” had one of the best selections of teachings so I started with that. I decided to read the book all the way through whether I understood it or not.

By the time I had finished I was hooked and decided to read all the books. The knowledge that I gained led me out of the church into greater vistas of learning.

What was interesting was that when I left the church, I did not leave behind the teachings that registered with my soul. After all, if a principle is true when you are in a religion it is also true when you are outside of it. In most cases the additional knowledge I learned did not destroy that which I had cherished in the past. Instead, it added to it and completed the picture.

I found it fascinating that in many cases both the Bible and Mormon scriptures are more in harmony with esoteric teachings than is the church. For instance, after a little research I found they both teach about reincarnation and published a couple treatises to that effect. Here are the links: LINK 1  LINK 2

Another thing that tested my open mind was the teaching that Jesus and the Christ are two separate individuals. Jesus was an advanced disciple who shared a body with the Christ who entered into him at his baptism.

I was amazed when I did some research to find that the scriptures affirm that this was a true teaching. Here are some links: LINK 1  LINK2

Then there were teachings on God and Christ that seemed to contradict the Bailey and other esoteric teachings. I had always had a problem with my church’s teachings about Christ. They saw him as the Word that created all the worlds in the universe as the King James version seems to indicate.  Out of all the trillions of worlds out there we just seemed to be the lucky one that the creator came to. What are the odds?

The esoteric teachings made much more sense. The Word is a principle behind all creation that created all the worlds in time and space. The Christ of our world was the first among us to contact the inner Christ that is in us all and manifest it.  He is not the only one for he said this:

“He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do.” John 14:12

Then he prayed that his disciples “may be one, as we are.” John 17:11

Jesus realized that he was not alone as the creator of just this earth, but one of the many sons of God mentioned by Job.

“Where was thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? Declare, if thou hast understanding…When the morning stars sang together, and ALL THE SONS OF GOD shouted for joy?” Job 38:4&6

Who are the “sons of God”? The scriptures give a clear answer. John the Beloved said: “WE are the sons of God…” I John 3:2

Notice that Job equated the Sons of God with the morning stars and Jesus said: “I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.” Rev 22:15

We were there with the bright Morning Star we call the Christ, but even he is one of many. No matter how high you go in this universe there are others still higher as indicated here:

“If thou see the oppressions of the poor, and violent judgements, and justice perverted, in the province, wonder not at this matter: for he that is high hath another higher, and there are others still higher than these.” Eccl 5:8

There is a chain of hierarchy and its purpose is to implement the principle behind the name of Jesus Christ. The name itself means “anointed to deliver.” If you take upon yourself the name of Jesus Christ you commit to reach out your hand to those below you in understanding and bring them up to where you are. Then one higher than you will reach out and pull you up higher because he is anointed to deliver. 

The whole chain of the hierarchy of all the worlds has the purpose of delivering those below to become like those above, fulfilling the command to “Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.” Matt 5:48

I have written a whole book explaining the Hierarchy of the Gods. You can find it at this link:

Overall then I have found the Bailey writings in particular to be more in harmony with the scriptures than any of the churches are in harmony with them.

That doesn’t mean that I accept all the Bailey writings without giving them critical thought. Djwahl Khul, who gave the teachings to Alice A. Bailey, has proved himself enough to me to become an earned authority. If I come across something that runs contrary to my thinking, I never instantly dismiss it, but give it weight and reflect on it. Often, I later discover he was correct though there are still several items I have on the shelf.

He is a Master of Wisdom and sees from a higher angle of vision than us mere mortals but is not perfect so a seeker should always get soul confirmation no matter how reliable you think the source is.

The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance- it is the illusion of knowledge. – Daniel J. Boorstin

April 22, 2026

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

 

 

 

The Mystery of Melchizedek

The Mystery of Melchizedek

Several times in the Bailey writings DK identifies Melchizedek with Sanat Kumara, the Lord of the World. Here is one:

“The Lord of the World, the Ancient of Days, Sanat Kumara, the planetary Logos, Melchizedek, He to Whom Christ referred when He said, ‘I and My Father are One.’” Externalization of the Hierarchy, Page 287

On the other hand, he indicated that the famous statement of oneness is not limited to a connection to one being but is more universal, for he also said this:

“The first Logos is electric fire, the fire of pure Spirit. Yet in manifestation He is the Son, for by union with matter (the mother) the Son is produced by Whom He is known. ‘I and my Father are One’ is the most occult statement in the Christian Bible, for it not only refers to the union of a man with his source, the monad, via the ego, but to the union of all life with its source, the will aspect, the first Logos.” TCF, Pages 150-151

He says quite a bit in this quote. First, he says that when in manifestation through matter the First Logos becomes the Son, or we could say the first ray of power manifests as love-wisdom.

Secondly, he says that the famous statement of union embraces more than a union with one being “for it not only refers to the union of a man with his source, the monad, via the ego, but to the union of all life with its source, the will aspect, the first Logos.”

What does this tell us? It tells us that Jesus and the overshadowing Christ saw themselves as, first of all, having a oneness to their source the monad, which is one with the universal God beyond all the hierarchies. Secondly there was a vision of oneness of not just the Christ, but “all life with its source.”

In other words, that which was realized by the Christ would eventually be achieved by all of us.

That Source he says is “the will aspect, the first Logos.” This would include Sanat Kumara, but not be limited to him, for this first aspect runs through all the Logoi in the universe.

Since DK links the name Melchizedek with Sanat Kumara it is natural to assume that the entity of that name in the Bible is the Lord of the World, but there is a major problem with this assumption which can be found in this statement:

“Sanat Kumara and His Pupils are in physical form, but have not taken dense physical bodies. They work on the vital etheric levels, and dwell in etheric bodies. Shamballa, where They dwell, exists in physical matter as do the Kumaras.” TCF Page 753

The type of bodies they have is revealed here:

“Shamballa will be one of the latest etheric sacred spots to be revealed as it exists in the matter of the second ether.” Initiation Human and Solar, Page 33

Thus Sanat Kumara dwells in Shamballa where all forms are composed of the second ether, which is normally invisible to human eyes, much more difficult to see than the fourth ether of Kirlian photography.

From the writings we have about Melchizedek it appears that he existed in a dense physical body. Consider this account from Genesis:

When Abraham learned that his nephew Lot had been kidnapped by four kings involved a conflict, he decided to rescue him and retrieve his stolen flocks and herds. He gathered 318 of his men and attacked them by night and made a daring rescue as well as retrieving his goods and some from his enemies. On his return he was greeted by a mysterious person. It is written:  

“And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God. And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth: And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand. And he gave him tithes of all.” Genesis14:18-20

Outside of a brief mention in Psalms this is all the Old Testament has to say about him. However, Josephus, the Jewish historian, adds a couple more details. His name means “Righteous King” and says he was a Canaanite leader who founded Salem, which was later named Jerusalem. There he built the first temple and served there as the first priest.

Then in some of the Aramaic renderings of the Book of Genesis we have this added detail: “And Melchisedech, king of Jerusalem—he is Shem the Great—brought out bread and wine, for he was the priest who ministered in the high priesthood before the most High God.”

So here Melchizedek is identified as Shem, son of Noah, who according to Biblical chronology outlived Abraham by about 35 years.

According to these various Old Testament era accounts it sounds like the Melchizedek of Abraham’s era could not have been Sanat Kumara, Lord of the World for the following reasons.

He was said to be a priest of the most high, not the most high himself.

He was obliviously in a dense physical body even sharing food and wine with Abraham.

So where does the idea come from that he was a supernatural being such as the Lord of the World?

It seems to largely come from the Book of Hebrews of the New Testament. There we are told that Christ was “Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec.” Heb 5:10

Then it indicates that Melchizedek was greater than Abraham because Abraham paid tithes to him, a recognition of superior status. Then it makes a statement about him not found in the Old Testament that adds to his mystique as someone more than human:

He is: “Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually.” Heb 7:3

This was indeed a strange statement since the ancient records tell us he was born and died and had parents. How could the mortal Melchizedek of the time of Abraham also be an almost godlike and immortal figure as presented in the Book of Hebrews?

A hint is given in verse 15 where Jesus is said to be “after the similitude of Melchisedec.”

This takes on additional meaning when we look at the Gnostic Library of Nag Hammadi wherein we discover that many Gnostic Christians saw Christ and Melchizedek as the same being. In other words, Christ was Melchizedek in a previous life.

In saying this we must take into consideration the teachings from DK that there were two entities involved in the life of Christ. There was Jesus who was incarnated as the Son of Mary. DK says that in previous lives he was Joshua who was with Moses and Jeshua from the time of Ezra. Also, Yogananda tells us he was Elisha who made this unusual request from Elijah: “let a double portion of thy spirit be upon me.” II Kings 2:9 He then manifested that double portion as Jesus.

Then at the baptism we are told that an even higher entity who had the position of the Christ descended upon Jesus and dwelt with him for the next three years. DK tells us that his entity was the same as Krishna of Hindu fame.

Thus, this entity who DK says is the Christ was not born into the body of Jesus but functions with him and filled the description of Melchizedek being “Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God.” Heb 7:3

This indeed sounds as if it was Melchizedek who descended upon Jesus and assisted him. No wonder DK says that the words of Jesus “I and My Father are One” refer to Melchizedek as the Father. (See Externalization of the Hierarchy, Page 287)

All these details are enough to make a student’s head spin. How do we put all these pieces together so they all make sense? Actually, it is pretty simple. Everything makes sense when we consider this scenario:

The mortal Melchizedek from the days of Abraham, who had a mother and father, was an incarnation of the entity who currently holds the position of the Christ. Even Abraham recognized him as greater than himself.

Melchizedek then returned at the baptism of Jesus and entered into him and assisted him for three years.

But, the overshadowing of Jesus was not a one-time event as it has happened numerous times, including at the time of Melchizedek’s mortal life.

Sanat Kumara could not take off 600 years from his position as the head of the Council Chamber at Shamballa to incarnate as Melchizedek so, instead, he overshadowed him and assisted him from a distance. Melchizedek and Sanat Kumara were thus one just as Jesus and Christ/ Melchizedek were one.

This Sanat Kumara, who was without father and mother, assisted Melchizedek in the days of Abraham as well as in the days of Jesus.

This explanation is far from orthodox, but seeing it from this vision causes all the pieces to fall into place and make sense.

May true seekers contemplate and receive soul confirmation or themselves.

 “And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them (the disciples); that they may be one, even as we are one.” Jesus, John 17:22

April 18, 2026

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE

Understanding Initiates

Understanding Initiates

A reader comments:  I am a little surprised that this autobiography seemed to paint Steve Jobs in such a good light.

I had read that he was notorious for absolutely humiliating his staff for the slightest misstep and was very difficult to work for.

JJ: Actually, Isaacson painted a whole picture of Jobs warts and all. This is what Steve wanted and gave him full power to write with no power of revision or dictating on his part. Steve said that he probably wouldn’t like parts of the book so he never planned on reading it. Quite a number of times he does come across as a jerk, but no sooner does that happen then you start to like him again and wish you could have met him.

The author does point out how difficult Steve was to work for but also notes how dedicated employees were to him and how many were willing to sacrifice anything to share in the achievements of the work. I liked one section where Isaacson compared Steve Jobs to Moses in the eyes of his admirers.

Question: If he was entering his 3rd initiation experience, then this was happening as he physically died?

JJ It would mean he entered the threshold of the Angel of the Presence as he was crossing over.

Question:  Does this mean that the Dweller was the cancer/disease that was killing him,

JJ The Dweller could have aggravated the cancer, but the cancer was not the dweller.

Question: Then as he started to pass over, he chose the Angel of the Presence and hence got to pass his 3rd initiation? At death, how would he choose between the Dweller or the Angel?

JJ: No one chooses the Dweller though you make choices that give the Dweller more power.. Why would you choose something that is trying to destroy you? You do, however, accept or reject the Angel of the Presence and whatever it was that Steve encountered at death he seemed to embrace it.

More often than not the initiations are acknowledged, consummated and understood between lives. When initiations are relived in a certain life this usually happens on the physical plane. All the growth and advancement to achieve initiation must be achieved in the physical. Often (but not always) the actual initiation happens between lives.

Question: Did Steve Jobs have control and master his emotions in order to pass the 2nd initiation before doing the third?

JJ If he passed the second then he did master his emotions but let me clarify what that means.

First, it does not mean that the initiate is like Spock who has little or no emotion. The initiate will have more powerful emotions than average because all the petals in his sacral center will be unfolded.

The initiate may very well express strong emotion from time to time but the emotion expressed is regulated and decided upon mentally. The most important thing a second degree or higher will do is not make important decisions based on emotion but upon what makes sense from rational or intuitive thinking.

A reader implied that I was portraying Jobs as very righteous, almost like a saint.

My point was that initiates are far from perfect especially as far as the personality goes and that was an accurate response

My comments on the possible initiate status of some is a million miles from Crèmes. Crème claims to have received his information directly from Christ and I make no such claim to authority but am making an educated guess.

The reason I talked about the possible initiate status of Jobs wasn’t to show my cleverness but to give readers a better idea of what an initiate is and the range of people that fit into this category. Many people think of an initiate as a very good or holy person who exudes love all the time and I wanted to make sure readers understand that many do not come across this way.

Reader Comment:  I can identify much more readily with his technical partner Steve Wozniak. Always two there are: one who is the front man, and the one who works behind the scenes and makes things happen.

JJ: Steve collaborated with Wozniak mainly at the beginning. There were many innovations from Apple that Wozniak did not participate in. Wozniak was smart, but he had little inclination to take any steps to initiate anything. If Steve did not have Wozniak available, he would have found someone else, but any engineer looking for another Jobs would still be looking.

Question: This whole thread on what is an initiate got me rethinking on the subject of disciple and initiate. So, to understand correctly, an initiate is necessarily a disciple but not the other way around?

JJ: Actually, it is the other way around. A truly committed disciple is one who is near or passed the third initiation and all of them are initiates to some degree. DK identifies seekers who are not disciples as aspirants.

DK told us back in the 1920s there were only a little over 300 disciples on the entire planet. One can only guess how many there are today but it would not be a large number.

There are a lot of initiates who are not disciples and do not consider themselves being on a spiritual path. What many of these do not realize is that all work that helps humanity evolve and progress is spiritual. There are initiates in science, education, sports, politics and various endeavors not normally seen as spiritual.

Question: Is it correct to say that an initiate will be a disciple first and foremost before getting to the stage where he or she actually initiates something?

JJ The first thing on an initiates mind is “What can I do to improve the world or the human condition?”

Question: And does an initiate always have to turn out to be a ”popular person” in the press or worldwide?

JJ: Good question. It may seem so because when people try and identify initiates usually famous people are named. The reason for this is that initiates that are not famous are generally not known to us and there is no way to name them.

Higher initiates usually make significant accomplishments that garners then some degree of public recognition, but many first and second degree initiates are unknown outside of their circle of associates. Many of these are initiating things that does not change the world but does create positive change and improves peoples’ lives. Some join with other initiates to work on a group endeavor. For instance, I’m sure there were a number of initiates who worked with Steve Jobs.

Reader Comment: I read something not long ago from DK stating that there will also be times where initiates must act behind the stage so to speak and without receiving all that recognition attention i.e.: like Steve Jobs did.

JJ: This will sometimes be the case. If a person initiates by working behind the scenes and is truly responsible for creating constructive change then he is of course initiating.

Question: And speaking about initiates, how may are there on earth at the present moment? I imagine there can’t be that many since it is a demanding endeavor and a lot of times there must be failures too.

JJ I’d say that there are millions who have passed the first initiation, hundreds of thousands who have passed the second, under 1000 who have passed the third and under 50 in mortality who have passed the fourth.

He is not an honest man who has burned his tongue and does not tell the company that the soup is hot. – Yugoslav proverb

Nov 29, 2011

Join JJ’s Facebook group HERE

Index for Original Archives

Index for Recent Posts

Easy Access to All the Writings

For Free Book go HERE and other books HERE